![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,991
|
3lb hardtail frame or 5.5lb suspension frame? Discuss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cape Town
Posts: 457
|
Quote:
I've just made the change from hardtail to full-suss. Pros: Descending is a pleasure - much more control, therefore safer when tired. More comfortable on all terrain Cons: Weight. Suspension bob when climbing out of the saddle (how much real effect on forward speed this has I don't know, but definitely not as responsive as the hardtail) My experience is based on a 4" travel Mountain Cycle Zen with 5th Element Air shock. My training partner has a Litespeed Sewanee - only 2.5" of travel Ti frame. It weighs 4.4lbs, so its a good compromise between the hardtail and full-suss. The ride is somewhere inbetween too. Not as soft on the downhills, but a lot less bob (almost none in fact) when climbing out the saddle. Downside for the Litespeed is price, $2995 for the frame. What would I choose? Well, I chose the MC Zen over the hardtail and I'm pretty happy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Current bike is a Specialized Stumpjumper Comp with disk brakes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
|
Adeventure racing: FS, hands down. The weight isn't noticable, and the suspension will keep ya feeling more fresh at the end of a ride. To me, that's probably the most important thing. I don't want to get off the bike all beat up.
24 hr: It would depend on the conditions. And the bike. FS has come such a way that most of the mid to higher end bikes have all but negated bob. Even my old GT doesnt bob when set properly and with proper technique. If its all flat, or very little downhill, I would go with the hardtail. Lots of hills, I would take a GOOD FS, no low end crap. Quote:
__________________
'05 GF Cake DLX SRAM X-9, 'Zocchi MX Comp, Avid BB7 Trek Equinox 7: 105, all stock, all fast '99 GT XCR5000: LX/XT, Avid SDs, Judy XC ------------------------------------------------------ Life is short, ride hard. BONZAI!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 294
|
yeah i wouold go with a good full suspension design, the good designs are more efficient in my view anyway, i ride a hardtail at the moment and probly will keep riding one mainly cause i think its more fun, theres more skill involved (not that i have too much of that lol but oh well) its not just ride over anyrthing and you get away with it, hardtail ya have to pick your lines more carefully and everything, i find it more interesting but for a 24 hour race i would rather something a bit more comfortable. im going to get a Giant Trance once they come into the country (late this year)
__________________
GT Ruckus SS 2006 Giant Trance 1 Giant TCR Euro |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
|
I haven't exceded 6 hrs in the saddle yet but I would say a good cromo hardtail and a suspension seatpost is about right for me. The steering feel is more important than the weight. When you get tired the lines tend to wander, hence a more inherrently stable design is favorable. In that aspect a lot of FS bikes will beat HT, but I have an HT that is a lot more stable than most FS.
![]() |
|
|
|