Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Mountain Bikes > General Mountain Bike Chat
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Mountain bike size question - wrong advice?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 25-02.-2005, 10:01 AM   #1
galaxycycle120
Registered User
 
galaxycycle120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 16
Default Mountain bike size question - wrong advice?

I just bought a 16" Raleigh mountain bike and when i'm standing over the bar there is about an inch of clearance. After I bought it somebody told me I'm supposed to have 4-5" of clearance when standing over the bar. I've never been mountain biking (I'm used to a road bike) and am not an expert on any kind of biking but that seemed like it would be an awfully small bike - is this guy's advice wrong? I've only ridden the bike on pavement a little to test it and it seemed fine, but I could still exchange it if needed.
galaxycycle120 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-02.-2005, 10:14 AM   #2
Fendercrazy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Spokane Wa USA
Posts: 54
Default Re: Mountain bike size question - wrong advice?

Quote:
Originally Posted by galaxycycle120
I just bought a 16" Raleigh mountain bike and when i'm standing over the bar there is about an inch of clearance. After I bought it somebody told me I'm supposed to have 4-5" of clearance when standing over the bar. I've never been mountain biking (I'm used to a road bike) and am not an expert on any kind of biking but that seemed like it would be an awfully small bike - is this guy's advice wrong? I've only ridden the bike on pavement a little to test it and it seemed fine, but I could still exchange it if needed.



If the seat height and the distance to the handlebar is comfortable than I think you would be good to go. I think I only have an inch or two standing over my bike's top bar.
Fendercrazy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-02.-2005, 11:20 AM   #3
krayzie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11
Default Re: Mountain bike size question - wrong advice?

I also have only about an inch or so of standover clearance. According to the book by Ned Overend it's supposed to be (inseam) - 14" = frame size, so I'm supposed to own a 16" bike (I'm currently riding a 19.5" and honestly I feel fine when mounting by stradalling the top tube). He said that the extra clearance helps with mounting on a downhill start. But my previous bike was a 16.5" and it feels awfully small and cramped.

On a seemingly related note, I've read somewhere on the web (forgot where) that a bike with a longer top tube and a shorter stem is much more stable then a bike with a shorter top tube and a longer stem.
krayzie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-02.-2005, 02:17 PM   #4
tyler_derden
Registered User
 
tyler_derden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kirksville, Mo.
Posts: 268
Default Re: Mountain bike size question - wrong advice?

Road bikes don't need so much standover clearance because falling off of them is relatively rare event. They also want to make the frame as stiff as possible for maximum efficiency. I think the issue with MTBs is that a little extra standover room helps keep you from busting your nutz on the top tube when you go down.

On an MTB, if you're riding off-road, you WILL go down...

TD
__________________
"When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things."
tyler_derden is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-02.-2005, 05:12 PM   #5
moparchris
Registered User
 
moparchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 294
Default Re: Mountain bike size question - wrong advice?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler_derden
Road bikes don't need so much standover clearance because falling off of them is relatively rare event. They also want to make the frame as stiff as possible for maximum efficiency. I think the issue with MTBs is that a little extra standover room helps keep you from busting your nutz on the top tube when you go down.

On an MTB, if you're riding off-road, you WILL go down...

TD


height on a road bike means nothingl, a road bikesa sizing is all about the length, height means nothing

stiff frame isnt nessecerily a good thing, some flex is bad but other flex is good you dont ewant a completely solid bike but if it flexes in some ways it can be bad because oit will absorb the power your putting in but some flex in the forks and seat/chainstays will help in absorbing road shocks

you should have a minimum of 1" clearance, are you still growing at all ? if so then its ideal to have that sortof size frame then you can grow into it for a while. if your not going to grow anymore and are uncomfortable with the height, well then exchange it.. do you know if raleigh measures crank centre to top tube centre or right to the top ?
__________________
GT Ruckus SS
2006 Giant Trance 1
Giant TCR Euro
moparchris is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-02.-2005, 04:08 AM   #6
galaxycycle120
Registered User
 
galaxycycle120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 16
Default Re: Mountain bike size question - wrong advice?

Thanks for all your replies, you were all very helpful. I'm just going to keep this one because the next size down just seemed awfully small. Also the inseam - 14" calculation one of you wrote gives me a 16" bike so I think this one will be just great.
galaxycycle120 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03.-2005, 06:08 AM   #7
Solanog
Registered User
 
Solanog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Costa Rica
Posts: 220
Default Re: Mountain bike size question - wrong advice?

Quote:
Originally Posted by galaxycycle120
Thanks for all your replies, you were all very helpful. I'm just going to keep this one because the next size down just seemed awfully small. Also the inseam - 14" calculation one of you wrote gives me a 16" bike so I think this one will be just great.

I have about an 1" of cleareance with my MB (similar to my RoadBike) I feel comfortable but the bicycle seems a little big, it is a 18.5" and I'm 5'10", the smaller one was 17". Those 4" have been recomended to me jsut in case you fall, as said above protecting your nutz the truth is I've fallen quite some times but my nutz are intact, my clavicle was broken
Solanog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03.-2005, 01:28 AM   #8
MountainPro
Registered User
 
MountainPro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SCOTLAND...you know it.
Posts: 3,015
Default Re: Mountain bike size question - wrong advice?

There is no calculation for mtb sizing that is accurate and if anyone tells you there is then they are a bullshit merchant.

Everybody is built differently and we all come in different sizes.
MountainPro is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03.-2005, 05:27 AM   #9
Born2bahick
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 49
Default Re: Mountain bike size question - wrong advice?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainPro
There is no calculation for mtb sizing that is accurate and if anyone tells you there is then they are a bullshit merchant.

Everybody is built differently and we all come in different sizes.

That is so true! I guy I ride with is 5'10" but has a 36" inseam, very long leggs and hardly any torso. A bike tall enough to fit the "distance from crotch to top tube" theory is so long that he has trouble reaching the handlebars. And the guy at the local bike shop is just the opposite, very long torso with short leggs. I myself came from Motocross racing years ago so I like a bigger bike under me than I need, I just like having something more substantial under me.
Also the kind of riding you do and the type terrain you ride can play a role in what you may and may not consider rideable
Born2bahick is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16-03.-2005, 08:13 AM   #10
freeride_er
Registered User
 
freeride_er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: THUNDERBAY ONTARIO CANADA
Posts: 23
Default Re: Mountain bike size question - wrong advice?

for jumps and street and stuff its good to have alot of clearance but for xc i think your good to go
freeride_er is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16-03.-2005, 08:15 AM   #11
freeride_er
Registered User
 
freeride_er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: THUNDERBAY ONTARIO CANADA
Posts: 23
Default Re: Mountain bike size question - wrong advice?

for xc that much is fine. i ride dirtjumps and street and i prefer alot of clearance just so i dont nut myself
freeride_er is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-04.-2005, 12:57 PM   #12
peet9471
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 134
Default Re: Mountain bike size question - wrong advice?

You only need the extra clearance when you leave the bike on the down hill slope.
__________________
Trek 7000 ZX
Trek 760
peet9471 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:58 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet