![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
soup wrote:
> > [snippage] > > 4,000 miles and never a new chain/cassette, is the small cog worn at > all > (shark finning of the teeth) has the chain stretched? If either of > these > apply maybe it's time to think of new ones . The small cog definitely has some teeth that look more shark-finny than the others; I reckon I need to replace it. The two smallest cogs on the cassette are separate from the rest so hopefully I could just buy replacements for these? I guess I'll need a new chain as well? Cheers, Donny |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
>The small cog definitely has some teeth that look more shark-finny than >the others; I reckon I need to replace it. > >The two smallest cogs on the cassette are separate from the rest so >hopefully I could just buy replacements for these? > Hopefully you can and this might be your cheapest option but also consider changing the smallest sprocket size if it has more than 11 teeth if you want to go abit faster. You might also want to consider a whole new cassette if this option isn't much dearer. You'll definitely need a new chain. I don't know what the current best value chain is for quality and competitive pricing but it probably won't be a shimano at least at the bottom end of the price scale. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Donny popped their head over the parapet saw what was going on and said
> The small cog definitely has some teeth that look more shark-finny > than the others; I reckon I need to replace it. > If only some teeth (on each cog) are affected perhaps they are meant to be that shape as an aid to shifting. Wear would show on ALL teeth (on one cog) -- yours S Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Donny" <thisisbackwards_PSynnoD@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cpkf0d$k8n$1$830fa79d@news.demon.co.uk... > soup wrote: > > > > [snippage] > > > > 4,000 miles and never a new chain/cassette, is the small cog worn at > > all > > (shark finning of the teeth) has the chain stretched? If either of > > these > > apply maybe it's time to think of new ones . > > The small cog definitely has some teeth that look more shark-finny than > the others; I reckon I need to replace it. This is almost certainly how they're supposed to be - some of the teeth will be shaped to encourage easy gear shifting. Have a look at a new cassette before writing yours off. > The two smallest cogs on the cassette are separate from the rest so > hopefully I could just buy replacements for these? Not economically. > I guess I'll need a new chain as well? This is what should be driving your purchasing decision. If the chain is worn/knackered, you should replace it. If it's too far gone, you'll need a new cassette as well. But try a chain first. I'd recommend an SRAM chain - PC58 or PC59 depending on whether you're 9 speed or not, and make sure you get the funny link with it. (and practice using it off the bike - there is a bit of a knack). cheers, clive |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Donny wrote: > soup wrote: > The two smallest cogs on the cassette are separate from the rest so > hopefully I could just buy replacements for these? Theoretically, but I don't think you'll be able to get them easily or economically. > I guess I'll need a new chain as well? I'm certain you do. The question really is whether you also need a new cassette. If you just change the chain you'll know soon enough as it will skip worse than ever if the cassette is worn out. Are you happy about tackling these jobs yourself or do you need some advice? -- Dave... |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
dkahn400 wrote:
> Donny wrote: > >>I guess I'll need a new chain as well? > > I'm certain you do. The question really is whether you also need a new > cassette. If you just change the chain you'll know soon enough as it > will skip worse than ever if the cassette is worn out. Are you happy > about tackling these jobs yourself or do you need some advice? I think I'll go for a new chain to start with then. What determines the type of chain to get, it is just the number of sprockets on the cassette? Cheers, Donny |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Donny wrote: > I think I'll go for a new chain to start with then. What determines > the type of chain to get, it is just the number of sprockets on the > cassette? Basically, yes. Go for the lowest available number that fits. You cannot use a 7/8 speed chain on a 9 speed cassette, for example, but you can use a 9 speed chain on a 7 speed cassette. A 7/8 speed chain, however, would be slightly better. There's also a tremendous range of prices. I personally don't think there's an awful lot to be gained in spending £30 on a chain rather than £10. Sachs/SRAM chains are very good. These come with a special link that enables you to break and remake the chain without special tools, once you have the knack. You will, however, still need a chain link extractor when you first put the chain on if you need to remove any links, and of course to remove the old chain. -- Dave... |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Donny wrote:
> I think I'll go for a new chain to start with then. What determines > the type of chain to get, it is just the number of sprockets on the > cassette? It is really. Cassette manufacturers tell you to use only their make of chain but that's not essential in practice. SRAM chain is pretty good. PC41, PC48, PC58, PC68 suits 8-speed and 7-speed; PC49 etc suits 9-speed. Make sure you get a "Powerlink" connecting link as they're not always supplied with the chains. ~PB |
|