![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
So I was watching Top Gear last night (yes, I know, but it's entertaining in a
juvenile way) when Clarkson made an off-hand comment about something in the news proving that cyclists are more likely to suffer heart attacks than motorists. A quick googling has left me none the wiser. Does anyone know to what he was referring? |
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Huw Lynes wrote: > So I was watching Top Gear last night (yes, I know, but it's entertaining in a > juvenile way) when Clarkson made an off-hand comment about something in the > news proving that cyclists are more likely to suffer heart attacks than > motorists. > > A quick googling has left me none the wiser. Does anyone know to what he was > referring? Probably, he was referring to this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3761012.stm ....and applying his usual level of logic. What the study in question showed was that the level of risk of a heart attack increased more for cyclists in a traffic jam than it did for motorists. |
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Huw Lynes wrote:
> So I was watching Top Gear last night (yes, I know, but it's entertaining in a > juvenile way) when Clarkson made an off-hand comment about something in the > news proving that cyclists are more likely to suffer heart attacks than > motorists. Probably this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3761012.stm R. |
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Huw Lynes <huw-l@moving-picture.com> wrote:
>A quick googling has left me none the wiser. Does anyone know to what he was >referring? Possibly a misrepresentation of these:- http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3991633.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1383645.stm However if I recall correctly, other studies have shown that car drivers inhale more pollution than cyclists so if Clarkson was referring to these then he has his conclusions back to front. Or maybe there is some other research I'm unaware of which shows that a sedentary big-mac-munching commute by car is better for the heart than some brisk exercise on a bike. Pete. |
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
That set me thinking - at 61 I am about the only one of my local Pub pals
that is NOT on blood pressure tablets! I cycle everywhere, they drive everywhere. Significant? |
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<simon@simonproven.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1102334862.172294.304310@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > Probably, he was referring to this: > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3761012.stm > That must have been it. But what an odd result. How do german cyclists manage to get themselves stuck in traffic jams? Rich |
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Huw Lynes wrote:
> So I was watching Top Gear last night (yes, I know, but it's entertaining in a > juvenile way) when Clarkson made an off-hand comment about something in the > news proving that cyclists are more likely to suffer heart attacks than > motorists. > > A quick googling has left me none the wiser. Does anyone know to what he was > referring? > > > > > He is a loud-mouthed, lard-arsed, smoking (ex smoking?) wazzok who, like most playground ejits, can't ever say or do anything constructive. I'd not pay him any heed if I were you... -- Chris |
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 12:18:18 -0000, "nobody760"
<nobody760@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote: >That set me thinking - at 61 I am about the only one of my local Pub pals >that is NOT on blood pressure tablets! I cycle everywhere, they drive >everywhere. > >Significant? > VERY |
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
nobody760 wrote:
> That set me thinking - at 61 I am about the only one of my local Pub pals > that is NOT on blood pressure tablets! I cycle everywhere, they drive > everywhere. > > Significant? Statistically? Depends how many pub pals you have, but probably not. Circumstantially? Yes. Have you made them aware of this? -- Mark. http://tranchant.plus.com/ |
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 12:41:08 +0000
Succorso <chris@saynotospam.ivy-house.net> wrote: > Huw Lynes wrote: > > So I was watching Top Gear last night (yes, I know, but it's entertaining > > in a juvenile way) when Clarkson made an off-hand comment about something > > in the > > news proving that cyclists are more likely to suffer heart attacks than > > motorists. > > > > A quick googling has left me none the wiser. Does anyone know to what he > > was referring? > > > > > > > > > > > > He is a loud-mouthed, lard-arsed, smoking (ex smoking?) wazzok who, like > most playground ejits, can't ever say or do anything constructive. > > I'd not pay him any heed if I were you... I don't and you are correct in your assessment of Mr Clarkson's character. I just wondered what the original source was. As usual the collective memory of u.r.c responded magnificently. Now, when I get into that argument with a non-cyclist trying to tell me I'll get a heart attack, I shall know from where the idiocy first rose. |
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Succorso wrote: > Huw Lynes wrote: > > So I was watching Top Gear last night (yes, I know, but it's entertaining in a > > juvenile way) when Clarkson made an off-hand comment about something in the > > news proving that cyclists are more likely to suffer heart attacks than > > motorists. > > > > A quick googling has left me none the wiser. Does anyone know to what he was > > referring? > > > wazzok Brilliant word - haven't heard that for ages, probably not since my last "Texan" bar. -- Hywel |
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
>A quick googling has left me none the wiser. Does anyone know to what he was
>referring? Probably yet another fantasy about cycling that is a total twisting of reality. Who knows what goes on in the retarded amoeba that is the woolly-haired w*nker. Top Gear went downhill *totally* when that twit took over. Cheers, helen s --This is an invalid email address to avoid spam-- to get correct one remove fame & fortune h*$el*$$e*nd**$o$ts**i*$*$m*m$o*n*s@$*a$o*l.c**$om$ --Due to financial crisis the light at the end of the tunnel is switched off-- |
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 6 Dec 2004 04:07:42 -0800, simon@simonproven.co.uk wrote:
>Probably, he was referring to this: >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3761012.stm >...and applying his usual level of logic. Indeed. Because when there was a study of risk of coronary heart disease in cyclists, it was found that they had lower levels of CHD than people who took their exercise in gyms. Guy -- May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting. http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk 88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at CHS, Puget Sound |
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers" <wafflycathcs@aol.compomcom> wrote in message news:20041206100248.07586.00001817@mb-m01.aol.com... > >A quick googling has left me none the wiser. Does anyone know to what he > >was >>referring? > > Probably yet another fantasy about cycling that is a total twisting of > reality. > Who knows what goes on in the retarded amoeba that is the woolly-haired > w*nker. > Top Gear went downhill *totally* when that twit took over. I read him in The Sun and I think he's become genuinely worried about his weight and smoking. His cycling "attacks" are probably borne out of envy more than anything. Grasping at any story that might show car drivers are healthier than cyclists will go some way to justify his unhealthy lifestyle in his mind. -- Simon M. |
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Simon Mason" <simon@simonmason.karoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:IJucnf2pc92D4SncSa8jmA@karoo.co.uk... > I read him in The Sun and I think he's become genuinely worried about > his weight and smoking. His cycling "attacks" are probably borne out > of envy more than anything. Grasping at any story that might show car > drivers are healthier than cyclists will go some way to justify his > unhealthy lifestyle in his mind. I reckon it's even simpler than that - cyclists are easy targets for a lazy joke. They are 'other people, not like us', so provide a butt for humour. Ie it isn't deliberate - indeed for him, stopping making these comments would require more effort. (This was the sort of thing the original political correctness stuff was about (original, not the version the Daily Mail et al like to pretend it means) ). cheers, clive |