![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6
|
Can anyone help to answer my query,
I'm new to training with power and am trying to get to grips with all the new data. One thing that I have noticed is that my ave power on the flat is a lot lower than when on a hill. Over say a 4 minute effort, I put out around 80watts less on the flat. RPE and heart rate are roughly the same. Could this be a problem with the power sensor or is it easier to put out more watts on inclines. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 266
|
Quote:
__________________
Smartty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
|
Hi Sheep(Derek?),
Only thing with power is not getting too carried away with it. For the majority of your winter training dont use it as a prescriptive tool, hr and RPE are better, rather keep an eye out for changes in your data ie more watts less effort etc. One thing you will do is become fascinated at how you can make yourself smoother with your pedalling/energy. Great tools ![]() Mark Young
__________________
SCU Junior Road Coach/Manager BC Level 2 Club Coach |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,305
|
If you look at the graphs, you will notice your power isn't very consistent on the flats, especially if you are running in a paceline. On hills, you are always putting out power, making the average more realistic.
Try riding alone in time trial fashion, keeping your power constant per monitor at a level near your current average. I would recommend to also keep the PI on the upper display because maximizing the PI keeps the power average. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
The efforts were both done on the same bike without Tri bars so I think your second theory is more likely to be correct. My Time trialing has always been pretty poor and I think the Power data has just confirmed this. I just didn't think the wattage would be that low for TT efforts (compared with climbing). Thanks for the feedback. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
Hi Mark, I've only had the thing for a week, but it's given the training a whole new perspective. The national Hill Climb is just over 2 weeks away, so I'm still doing some hard efforts for this. Normally this time of year I'm easing off and thinking about starting winter training, but I'm going to persevere with the hard efforts, just to get a bench mark for next year. Cheers Derek |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Community Team
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newport, South Wales
Posts: 3,830
|
Quote:
Derek, Related to the hills issue, if you're in Scotland (or have hilly terrain like i do in sunny Wales) then you may find that you have to put out significantly higher power uphill simply to ride at a moderate velocity - because the hills are steep (i'm assuming they're steep where you are). Ric
__________________
http://www.cyclecoach.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 41
|
Next year sheepo this is the man that'll win the hill climb chapms. me or jason mcintyre. probably me though
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
Keep up the good work. Are you riding it this year? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 41
|
Alright sheep hows it going?
Couldn't ride the h/c this year also never realised that alex coutts would be riding he's some boy doing us proud abroad. Anyway, how did u get on, use the power cranks? Cheerio |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Hi Glasgow United and Sheep, As Mike Zagorski indicated on the Braveheart Forum, do you guys have any data from the National Hill climb you wish to share?? You can email me offline if you like! Mark Young
__________________
SCU Junior Road Coach/Manager BC Level 2 Club Coach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
Mark, I'll have a look at my race file tonight and post tomorrow. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
Distance = 2.1ml Power Ave = 312 Max Power = 552 HR Ave = 185 HR max = 193 Time = 16.35 Elevation = 1085 ft Felt = Like shit Overall I had improved my ave power for similar efforts in the weeks prior to the HC, but it's still miles behind the quick guys ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
yeah still a long way to go to beat teh top guys but we're not talking a mega ig difference. Do you reckon you could add on a nother 80 watts to your performance for next year ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 22
|
I have the opposite problem; I can TT for 30 min at 350, and over 400W for 10 minutes. I also climb with the best of my peers, but I struggle to sustain 350W when climbing.
Have there been any studies on the Polar on differing gradients vs a PowerTap or SRM?? |
|
|
|