Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Equipment
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Frame Geometry

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 29-03.-2003, 11:51 AM   #1
ibis315
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 8
Question Frame Geometry

I'm looking to buy a new frame, but I have some interesting geometry numbers I got from the manufacturer :

Size : 52.5 cm
Top Tube : 53.5 cm
Head Ang : 72 Degrees
Seat Ang : 74 Degrees
Chain Stay : 38 cm (really short)
Fork Rake : 4.3 cm
BB drop : 9 cm (wow!)
BB Height : 25 cm (wow!)
Wheelbase : 95.8 cm (short)

My question is, with such a low bottom bracket height combined with short wheelbase and shallow head tube angle, how would the bike handle? My current frame is :

Top Tube : 53 cm
Head Ang : 73 Degrees
Seat Ang : 73 Degrees
Chain Stay : 41 cm
Fork Rake : ?
BB drop : 6 cm
Wheelbase : about 98 cm

My main concern is the low bottom bracket and shallow head angle making the bike handle too slow. However, does the short chain stay/wheelbase compensate for BB and HA? Thanks for the information.
ibis315 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31-03.-2003, 03:26 AM   #2
Neo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 25
Default

are you sure these figures are correct? these numbers seem very, well, outside the norm. BB drop is usually around 70mm giving a BB height of around 263 depending on tyres used, and the head angle of 72 would normally be matched with a 45mm offset.

Nevertheless, I'll draw it on a CAD program to see if the numbers you give will work.

Neil
www.billato.com
Neo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31-03.-2003, 07:48 PM   #3
dexmax
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 45
Default

the chainstay is too short, i guess??? shortest i've seen is 39.5cm.
good for 650c maybe....
wheelbase too short. i think.

bb height? is this some kind of sports car? hehe...

is this a triathlon bike?

I'll check the angles....
dexmax is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31-03.-2003, 08:04 PM   #4
steve
Administrator
 
steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Below Australia -20 years
Posts: 1,993
Send a message via ICQ to steve
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dexmax

is this a triathlon bike?


Thats what I was thinking: 74 Degree seat angle, 38cm chain stay lenght, 25cm BB height sounds like a tri bike to me.

What sort of racing/riding are you doing idis?

cheers!
__________________
Steve

CyclingForums.com
steve is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-04.-2003, 02:00 AM   #5
Neo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 25
Default

KACHUNK!!!!

of course, it's the numbers for a 650c wheel frame. Haven't had to build one for a while, that's why it wasn't immediately obvious
(to me anyway!)

On the other hand, if it's not......

Neil
www.billato.com
Neo is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:14 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet