![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 246
|
What do you guys make of the contradictory reaction of Phonak to the Hamilton situation vs. how they reacted to Oscar Camenzind?
http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/news/story?id=1885736 Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 712
|
Quote:
It's apples and oranges. The EPO test is an established test. The one in question regarding Tyler is new. The science on the new test seems to be very subjective requireing interpretation of the results. Time should tell. It's unfortunate that such a guy as Tyler will be the first case to prove or dissprove the new test valid or not. I would expect him to fight this hard and long though. |
|
|
|
|