Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Women's Cycling
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Saddle Comfort Question

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 27-08.-2004, 03:30 AM   #1
ecassing
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3
Default Saddle Comfort Question

When choosing a saddle, which is more important: making sure your sit bones are comfortable, or the "other part"?

I have tried 2 saddles so far: The Terry Butterfly felt great for supporting my sit bones, but made me numb up front for 2 days (I think the cutout is too narrow). I also tried a Serfas Terazzo, which didn't make me numb up front (the cutout is wider than the Terry), but I suspect the seat area is too narrow...the bones between my sit bones seem to hurt...it's almost as if it's missing my sit bones completely.

Any advice?
Thanks.
ecassing is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-08.-2004, 08:47 AM   #2
denisegoldberg
Registered User
 
denisegoldberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Andover, MA, USA - north of Boston
Posts: 41
Default Re: Saddle Comfort Question

Both!

The last time I shopped for a saddle I wasn't happy until I got to saddle number 4, which I now have on two of my bikes. The saddle that works for me is a Fi'zi:k Vitesse: http://www.fizik.com/Products_Unisex_Vitesse.aspx. I returned two Terry saddles and one Specialized saddle after very short rides. For me, the saddles with the hole in them were worse than those with a solid top - although many people like the hole, for me it increased pressure elsewhere. And the Vitesse does not sport a center hole; it is solid but has right amount of padding for me.

Unfortunately, what works for one person doesn't work for the next. I'd encourage you to try some different saddles.
__________________
http://www.denisegoldberg.com
denisegoldberg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-08.-2004, 08:49 AM   #3
pam_in_sc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: Saddle Comfort Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by ecassing
When choosing a saddle, which is more important: making sure your sit bones are comfortable, or the "other part"?

It is all individual, but to me what matters most is having my sit bones supported. I tried a women's saddle with a cutout and it was too narrow for my seat bones--no good for more than about 10 miles. I now ride a Brooks Team Pro S and am very happy--excellent support, some flex over bumps so I don't feel like I have been sitting on a rock, and no soft tissue problems. But I had a 10 lb. baby--I know I have wide seat bones.
pam_in_sc is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:20 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet