Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Health Nutrition and Supplements
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Average Heart Rate v Theory

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-08.-2004, 10:34 PM   #1
neilg
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5
Default Average Heart Rate v Theory

Hope you guys can help me.

Have recently purchased a HRM and have been logging progress over the past few rides. I am relatively fit and have recently returned to cycling after 15years.

Age 38 therefore max HR should be 220-38 = 182.

However, as an example on Sunday I did my usual route (relatively flat with a few undulations and one climb of around 1 mile at the end) of 20.5 miles in 58min 14secs.

Over the ride avg HR was 166, maximum was 204 (mashing as I was trying to catch someone up). When spinning at around cadence of 95-105 HR was wandering between 165-175, not wildly but slowly going up then coming down as I eased back a bit.

Question is, do you think my HR is high for my age and fitness level?

Don't smoke, don't drink much and suffer no ill effects after such a ride.

Any advice much appreciated.
neilg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08.-2004, 01:18 AM   #2
ric_stern/RST
Community Team
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newport, South Wales
Posts: 3,831
Default Re: Average Heart Rate v Theory

Quote:
Originally Posted by neilg
Hope you guys can help me.

Have recently purchased a HRM and have been logging progress over the past few rides. I am relatively fit and have recently returned to cycling after 15years.

Age 38 therefore max HR should be 220-38 = 182.

However, as an example on Sunday I did my usual route (relatively flat with a few undulations and one climb of around 1 mile at the end) of 20.5 miles in 58min 14secs.

Over the ride avg HR was 166, maximum was 204 (mashing as I was trying to catch someone up). When spinning at around cadence of 95-105 HR was wandering between 165-175, not wildly but slowly going up then coming down as I eased back a bit.

Question is, do you think my HR is high for my age and fitness level?

Don't smoke, don't drink much and suffer no ill effects after such a ride.

Any advice much appreciated.


the 220-age only fits a population and can't be used to define your HRmax. the regression equation of 220-age has a standard deviation of 15 bpm...

if you want to know your HRmax, then you'll need to do a HRmax test, which should be done either in a sports science/exercise physiology lab, or with qualified personnel.

additionally, due to your age and lack of training, you would need medical clearance before performing such a test.

ric
__________________
http://www.cyclecoach.com
ric_stern/RST is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:29 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet