Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > General > The Bike Café > aus.bicycle
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


OT: Is "Critical Mass" getting a tad more serious?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 19-05.-2004, 01:19 PM   #1
hippy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT: Is "Critical Mass" getting a tad more serious?

  Reply With Quote
Old 19-05.-2004, 03:38 PM   #2
flyingdutch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT: Is "Critical Mass" getting a tad more serious?

hippy wrote:
> http://news.com.au/common/story_pag...5E28101,00.html
> hippy




HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA



--


  Reply With Quote
Old 19-05.-2004, 03:43 PM   #3
Terry Collins
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT: Is "Critical Mass" getting a tad more serious?

hippy wrote:
>
> http://news.com.au/common/story_pag...5E28101,00.html



Looks like something you would see in those Arnie the Conan movies {:-).

Looks totally impractical, but if I double size it, it would go great on
my racks front and back for car radiators and boots {:-)
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-05.-2004, 08:39 PM   #4
cfsmtb
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT: Is "Critical Mass" getting a tad more serious?

hippy wrote:
> http://news.com.au/common/story_pag...5E28101,00.html
> hippy




Ahhahaha! Just when you think CM's losing it's radical edge!

Sure beats the hissy fits and silly tanties going on the CM-Melb list at
present. Hey, Hippy surely you weren't inspired by photos of my
"gladiatorial" CM costume of a few years back? LOL



--


  Reply With Quote
Old 19-05.-2004, 09:45 PM   #5
Ritch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT: Is "Critical Mass" getting a tad more serious?

hippy <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote in message news:<WeBqc.11013$B36.10730@fe14.usenetserver.com>...
> http://news.com.au/common/story_pag...5E28101,00.html
>
> hippy
>


This would be pretty good if you wanted to do an impersonation of
Shredder from the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles cartoons (the original,
of course). I'd try to import one myself, except that changing gears
with downtube shifters would probably result in severed artery.

I guess there is another reason to go fixed/SS... nah, I'm only
allowed one bike in the house, so it has to have gears. This 1-bike
policy is a pain.

Ritch
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-05.-2004, 09:59 PM   #6
Terry Collins
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT: Is "Critical Mass" getting a tad more serious?

Ritch wrote:

....snip.....

> I guess there is another reason to go fixed/SS... nah, I'm only
> allowed one bike in the house, so it has to have gears. This 1-bike
> policy is a pain.


I suppose that you are also only allowed one female too? {:-)

Demand equality, so there is only one cat, one kid, one of everything.
You are bound to find something she wants to compromise over.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-05.-2004, 10:19 PM   #7
wassupdawg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT: Is "Critical Mass" getting a tad more serious?

Ritch wrote:
> I'm only allowed one bike in the house, so it has to have gears.
> This 1-bike policy is a pain.
> Ritch




Man, you gotta fight for your right to...



--


  Reply With Quote
Old 20-05.-2004, 10:06 AM   #8
Ritch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT: Is "Critical Mass" getting a tad more serious?

Terry Collins <terryc@woa.com.au> wrote in message news:<40AB5A21.2E270E49@woa.com.au>...
> Ritch wrote:
>
> ...snip.....
>
> > I guess there is another reason to go fixed/SS... nah, I'm only
> > allowed one bike in the house, so it has to have gears. This 1-bike
> > policy is a pain.

>
> I suppose that you are also only allowed one female too? {:-)
>
> Demand equality, so there is only one cat, one kid, one of everything.
> You are bound to find something she wants to compromise over.


heh heh, one female... I like that.

Actually, the 1-bike policy allows me to claim some kind of perverse
moral high ground in that my one bike is my commuter, racer, dirt-road
bike (not mtb though - not quite flexible enough to accommodate). I
add some aero bars and it is also my triathlon bike. A mid-range '98
Giant Al road frame with Shimano 535 wheels and 23mm tyres. This is
the same kind of moral high ground that riders with other kinds of
bikes use to justify their choices - nothing wrong with that, mind
you.

Personally, I don't understand the fuss that some people put up about
"low-spoke" and "manufactured" wheels and all that. I've broken one
drive-side spoke in about 5000k, which happened about 3000k ago when I
mistimed a bunny-hop over a pothole (doh!). Solution: buy spoke,
install spoke, true wheel on a rim-trainer using the rim-rollers to
guide. Haven't had to true the wheel since.

Ritch
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-05.-2004, 10:58 AM   #9
cfsmtb
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT: Is "Critical Mass" getting a tad more serious?

Ritch wrote:
> I guess there is another reason to go fixed/SS... nah, I'm only allowed
> one bike in the house, so it has to have gears.
> This 1-bike policy is a pain.
> Ritch




Ah, we have no such problem. Going to get a BIGGER bike room soon. So
all the projects & working bikes be all together (20+?) How sweet.
Even Hippy was impressed at a recent tour of our bike room.



--


  Reply With Quote
Old 20-05.-2004, 11:57 AM   #10
flyingdutch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT: Is "Critical Mass" getting a tad more serious?

cfsmtb wrote:
> Ah, we have no such problem. Going to get a BIGGER bike room soon. So
> all the projects & working bikes be all together (20+?) How sweet.
> Even Hippy was impressed at a recent tour of our bike room.




20+ bikes. whoooaahhh Nellie!!!!

Im impressed (and somewhat jealous)

Makes my 9 look tame. Then again you said "Our"...

Spent last Sat reorganising the shed to accomodate small boat (Sabo for
kids) which meant trying to streamline the collection (yeah right!) but
just meant I rearranged it and got them red-large-J-hooks to hang a few
bikes on and work vertical.

Sadly one of our spare rooms is waisted on kids and exchange student!

photos ?



--


  Reply With Quote
Old 20-05.-2004, 01:38 PM   #11
hippy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT: Is "Critical Mass" getting a tad more serious?

>Originally posted by flyingdutch 20+ bikes. whoooaahhh Nellie!!!!

10 each.. I'm jealous too

>Makes my 9 look tame. Then again you said "Our"...


Damn, even I don't have that many! You're not counting the kid's bikes
are ya? ;-P

>Sadly one of our spare rooms is waisted on kids and exchange student!


Swedish? ;-)

hippy



--


  Reply With Quote
Old 20-05.-2004, 05:41 PM   #12
Peter Signorini
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT: Is "Critical Mass" getting a tad more serious?


"Ritch" <rjlongmire@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:e5da2a15.0405190445.6ab949da@posting.google.com...
> hippy <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote in message

news:<WeBqc.11013$B36.10730@fe14.usenetserver.com>...

> nah, I'm only allowed one bike in the house, so it has to have gears.

This 1-bike
> policy is a pain.


Ahh, a 1 bike policy is quite OK. I operate by this policy very happily. One
touring bike (26 MTB with racks, mudguards and trekking tyres), one dually
bike, one road bike (the old 27" used for distance rides infrequently), one
tandem bike. We're doing pretty well on the one bike principle, but still
need one folding bike and one recumbent bike.

Then there's the rest of the family's bikes.

Cheers
Peter


  Reply With Quote
Old 20-05.-2004, 07:53 PM   #13
Parbs
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT: Is "Critical Mass" getting a tad more serious?

Ritch wrote:
><snipd>, I'm only allowed one bike in the house, so it has to have gears. This 1-bike policy is a pain.
>
> Ritch


Fair enough; one bike in the house, 6 in the shed/garage or whatever.

Parbs


  Reply With Quote
Old 20-05.-2004, 09:57 PM   #14
Etxy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT: Is "Critical Mass" getting a tad more serious?

At age 16, I had 5 bikes. Sold two since then, have a couple of frames and random bits floating around, but a good place is A) under the house or B) in the bedroom. Might pacify the missus, Ritch.

No? Keep em at a friends place, in that case. And buy them in secret.
Develop a cache of ultra-high secret cycling weaponry. Maybe build a
small bunker to accommodate them?

Or not, as the case may be.



--


  Reply With Quote
Old 20-05.-2004, 09:57 PM   #15
Etxy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT: Is "Critical Mass" getting a tad more serious?

At the tender age of 16, I had 5 bikes. I had a good policy with the folks; as long as they weren't in their way, it wasn't a problem. Sold two since then, have a couple of frames and random bits floating around, but a good place is A) under the house or B) in the bedroom. Might pacify the missus, Ritch.

No? Keep em at a friends place, in that case. And buy them in secret.
Develop a cache of ultra-high secret cycling weaponry. Maybe build a
small bunker to accommodate them?

Or not, as the case may be.



--


  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:23 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com