Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
20-05.-2004, 10:59 AM
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: First Helmet : jury is out.
Curtis L. Russell wrote:
<< And this bears what relationship to most of the cyclists being discussed? Nevermind that most of the accidents that you describe are not impacted largely if at all by helmets, ... >> Wait a second, who said anything about helmets? Not me. << ...your own presumption is that your small band of brothers are unusual in the amount and nature of cycling that you do. Therefore any anecdotal evidence from that group is by your own presumptions not applicable to the general conversation. >> I think this is a bizarre argument: we have tons more experience than average cyclists and therefore our experiences are not valid when discussing average cycling. I think the ones who do the most riding in traffic will know the most about it. Robert |
|
Linear Mode
