Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > General > The Bike Café > rec.bicycles.misc
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Flat bar bike for road

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 17-05.-2004, 11:19 PM   #1
M Powell
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flat bar bike for road

Having now put a couple of thousand miles on my 2003 Motobecane hybrid, I'm
starting to get a case of Bike Envy. My biggest problem with my bike is that
it weighs 33 lbs., along with the fact that all the components are entry
level. I know that I want to stick with a flat bar, and I'm not even certain
that I "need" a new bike... for a $325 bike it has done quite well.

But I'm looking at Trek 7500FX and 7700FX, and Giant Cypress SX & SL. Both
sets of bikes are about $300 apart, and the Giants are about $100 less than
the Treks. Have also looked at the Marin Alps models, but didn't especially
like the bikes or the LBS that has them.

So, questions:
-- How much trouble/expense would it be to help my Motobecane lose weight by
swapping out its suspension fork? I see sale items in the catalogues for
aluminum & composite forks, but is this a good swap?
-- Are there other fix-its or swaps that would help me to just keep the
Motobecane & be happier with it?

Or:
-- I don't really understand why, but I seem to like the Cypress models over
the Treks. I guess they seem a little less hybrid-ish. Is there anything I
should know about these brands before putting money down? Where's the $100
difference?
-- At what point is the $300 step-up absolutely worth it? I know the
components are better & lighter, but what performance & weight gains do you
really get?
-- Is there another brand or model that I should look at? Must absolutely be
$1,000 or less.

Thanks!
--Murray


  Reply With Quote
Old 18-05.-2004, 01:04 AM   #2
davlbrown
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Flat bar bike for road

M Powell wrote:
> Having now put a couple of thousand miles on my 2003 Motobecane hybrid,
> I'm starting to get a case of Bike Envy. My biggest problem with my bike
> is that it weighs 33 lbs., along with the fact that all the components
> are entry level. I know that I want to stick with a flat bar, and I'm
> not even certain that I "need" a new bike... for a $325 bike it has done
> quite well.
> But I'm looking at Trek 7500FX and 7700FX, and Giant Cypress SX & SL.
> Both sets of bikes are about $300 apart, and the Giants are about $100
> less than the Treks. Have also looked at the Marin Alps models, but
> didn't especially like the bikes or the LBS that has them.
> So, questions: -- How much trouble/expense would it be to help my
> Motobecane lose weight by swapping out its suspension fork? I see sale
> items in the catalogues for aluminum & composite forks, but is this a
> good swap? -- Are there other fix-its or swaps that would help me to
> just keep the Motobecane & be happier with it?
> Or: -- I don't really understand why, but I seem to like the Cypress
> models over the Treks. I guess they seem a little less hybrid-ish. Is
> there anything I should know about these brands before putting money
> down? Where's the $100 difference? -- At what point is the $300 step-up
> absolutely worth it? I know the components are better & lighter, but
> what performance & weight gains do you really get? -- Is there another
> brand or model that I should look at? Must absolutely be $1,000 or less.
> Thanks! --Murray


I just bought the Cypress SX. I commute to work and have tried a variety
of bikes, road and mtn. Need something durable and fast. The SX runs
about $600. The SL about $800. I prefer clippless pedals and will switch
out the clippless SPD pedals on my mountain bike or I would have gotten
the SL. The SL has a carbon fork and higher end shifters. Both have
Michelin Dynamic tires which I will immediately upgrade to something
more durable with a kevlar liner.

Have not taken delivery as yet. There were only 4 of these in the
country when I got mine. Will let you know in a week or so.







--


  Reply With Quote
Old 18-05.-2004, 01:48 AM   #3
Badger_South
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Flat bar bike for road

On Mon, 17 May 2004 14:19:31 GMT, "M Powell" <ppowellmrp@earthlink.net>
wrote:

>Having now put a couple of thousand miles on my 2003 Motobecane hybrid, I'm
>starting to get a case of Bike Envy. My biggest problem with my bike is that
>it weighs 33 lbs., along with the fact that all the components are entry
>level. I know that I want to stick with a flat bar, and I'm not even certain
>that I "need" a new bike... for a $325 bike it has done quite well.
>
>But I'm looking at Trek 7500FX and 7700FX, and Giant Cypress SX & SL. Both
>sets of bikes are about $300 apart, and the Giants are about $100 less than
>the Treks. Have also looked at the Marin Alps models, but didn't especially
>like the bikes or the LBS that has them.


I just test rode a Giant Cypress SX, and it was OK, but seemed like a 'toy'
for some reason, although it went up the incline in the shopping center
much better than the current ride, a 45lb MTN bike! <g>

Supposedly Giant is having a sale on or about the week of the 24th, or
maybe it's only my LBS (Performance Bikes), so you might want to check it
out.

The Trek shop was completely out of hybrids, having sold out all of them
last week, and only had a 7200 which -is- a toy (heh).

They didn't seem to understand why a person would eschew the fork
suspension and seatpost suspension until I said 'five pounds'. IMO, very
few people -need- that suspension, but it's hard to realize (it was for me
at first). Actually, I think the non-suspension versions (FX) are cheaper,
IIRC.

So it's 'wait another week' for me until the '05s come in. Meantime they're
going to try and find me a 7500FX, which is what I really want to test.

You've ridden both, I presume? What about the Giant was better, in your
opinion.

Best,

-B


  Reply With Quote
Old 18-05.-2004, 07:30 AM   #4
David L. Johnson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Flat bar bike for road

On Mon, 17 May 2004 14:19:31 +0000, M Powell wrote:

> So, questions:
> -- How much trouble/expense would it be to help my Motobecane lose weight by
> swapping out its suspension fork? I see sale items in the catalogues for
> aluminum & composite forks, but is this a good swap?


Probably not. The suspension fork is a lot longer than almost any rigid
fork you can find, and so the geometry of the bike will be changed by this
switch. It _might_ be better, but probably not. Also, you won't save
enough weight. Going to a lighter bike overall can save you 10 pounds for
not that much money.

--

David L. Johnson

__o | "Business!" cried the Ghost. "Mankind was my business. The common
_`\(,_ | welfare was my business; charity, mercy, forbearance, and
(_)/ (_) | benevolence, were, all, my business. The dealings of my trade
were but a drop of water in the comprehensive ocean of my
<business!" --Dickens, "A Christmas Carol"
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-05.-2004, 10:55 PM   #5
M Powell
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Flat bar bike for road


"David L. Johnson" <david.johnson@lehigh.edu> wrote in message
newsan.2004.05.17.22.30.06.614041@lehigh.edu...
> On Mon, 17 May 2004 14:19:31 +0000, M Powell wrote:
>
> > So, questions:
> > -- How much trouble/expense would it be to help my Motobecane lose

weight by
> > swapping out its suspension fork? I see sale items in the catalogues for
> > aluminum & composite forks, but is this a good swap?

>
> Probably not. The suspension fork is a lot longer than almost any rigid
> fork you can find, and so the geometry of the bike will be changed by this
> switch. It _might_ be better, but probably not. Also, you won't save
> enough weight. Going to a lighter bike overall can save you 10 pounds for
> not that much money.
> -- > David L. Johnson
>
> __o | "Business!" cried the Ghost. "Mankind was my business. The

common
> _`\(,_ | welfare was my business; charity, mercy, forbearance, and
> (_)/ (_) | benevolence, were, all, my business. The dealings of my trade
> were but a drop of water in the comprehensive ocean of my
> <business!" --Dickens, "A Christmas Carol"



Many thanks for all the responses. I do believe that a different bike is in
order, and I'll go into a higher gear for Saving Up mode.

--Murray


  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:59 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com