Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
19-03.-2003, 09:33 AM
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1
|
Longer Legs = More Speed?
A quick question on form: Does having longer or shorter legs give a cyclist an advantage over someone with "average" length legs? For example, with running, supposively one with long legs can outstride others (especially on down hill). Also, having smaller feet makes for quicker turnover when stepping. (I'm sure none of this makes any substantial difference over say, being fit, but I was just curious.) This is of course assuming the bike is "perfectly" fit for the individual. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
19-03.-2003, 07:25 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Gistel - Belgium
Posts: 112
|
I have noticed that pro cyclists on average have longer legs (especially the thighs), but I don't know how much this accounts for their success. Anyone seen any studies on this?
Niek |
|
|
|
|
19-03.-2003, 07:29 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Below Australia -20 years
Posts: 1,993
 |
Quote:
I remember reading longer thighs help things like time trials and climbing......i'm not sure how true this is though. cheers! |
|
|
|
|
|
19-03.-2003, 09:53 PM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 62
|
Longer legs means greater leverage so would be good for pushing big gears. Thats why time trial riders like Millar, McGee and Olano (taller riders with long legs) are good at what they do (they also are freaks aerobically).
I was reading in a magazine that the average elite pursuiter is 6'4 then kilo rider is a bit over 6' and track sprinters are 5'10 or 11. |
|
|
|
|
22-03.-2003, 08:12 PM
|
#5 |
|
Community Team
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 780
|
not necessarily true
in runners the advantages of stride length from height is often outweighed by a corresponding loss in stride frequency and also by the fact that as dimensions increase linearly volume and thus mass increase as a cube so therefore taller and bigger generally means worse power to weight i suppose two cyclist of the same and height with different length legs may exhibit different power per stroke and different frequencies but it might be hard to tell if these are directly related to leg length |
|
|
|
Linear Mode
