![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Stage 5 - May 2: Lausanne-Lausanne ITT, 20 km Results 1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems 26.29 2 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com 0.35 3 Ronny Scholz (Ger) Gerolsteiner 0.53 4 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 0.57 5 Stefano Garzelli (Ita) Vini Caldirola-Nobili Rubinetterrie 1.00 6 Rubens Bertogliati (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 7 Carlos Sastre (Spa) Team CSC 8 Marco Pinotti (Ita) Lampre 9 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.13 10 Jörg Jaksche (Ger) Team CSC 11 Yuriy Krivtsov (Ukr) Ag2r-Prevoyance 1.21 12 Alexandre Moos (Swi) Phonak Hearing Systems 1.22 Final general classification 1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems 2 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.42 3 Leonardo Piepoli (Ita) Saunier Duval-Prodir 2.17 4 Tadej Valjavec (Slo) Phonak Hearing Systems 2.18 .... 7 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 3.30 8 Francisco Mancebo (Spa) Illes Balears-Banesto 9 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
And Tyler won this race last year, too. Tyler's got to get through a
tour without crashing. Richard Longwood wrote: > Stage 5 - May 2: Lausanne-Lausanne ITT, 20 km > > Results > 1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems 26.29 > 2 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com 0.35 > 3 Ronny Scholz (Ger) Gerolsteiner 0.53 > 4 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 0.57 > 5 Stefano Garzelli (Ita) Vini Caldirola-Nobili Rubinetterrie 1.00 > 6 Rubens Bertogliati (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir > 7 Carlos Sastre (Spa) Team CSC > 8 Marco Pinotti (Ita) Lampre > 9 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.13 > 10 Jörg Jaksche (Ger) Team CSC > 11 Yuriy Krivtsov (Ukr) Ag2r-Prevoyance 1.21 > 12 Alexandre Moos (Swi) Phonak Hearing Systems 1.22 > > Final general classification > > 1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems > 2 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.42 > 3 Leonardo Piepoli (Ita) Saunier Duval-Prodir 2.17 > 4 Tadej Valjavec (Slo) Phonak Hearing Systems 2.18 > ... > 7 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 3.30 > 8 Francisco Mancebo (Spa) Illes Balears-Banesto > 9 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
And so does Lance.
"Richard Adams" <ackthpt@concentric.net> wrote in message news:c733gs$qdp@dispatch.concentric.net... > And Tyler won this race last year, too. Tyler's got to get through a > tour without crashing. > > Richard Longwood wrote: > > Stage 5 - May 2: Lausanne-Lausanne ITT, 20 km > > > > Results > > 1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems 26.29 > > 2 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com 0.35 > > 3 Ronny Scholz (Ger) Gerolsteiner 0.53 > > 4 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 0.57 > > 5 Stefano Garzelli (Ita) Vini Caldirola-Nobili Rubinetterrie 1.00 > > 6 Rubens Bertogliati (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir > > 7 Carlos Sastre (Spa) Team CSC > > 8 Marco Pinotti (Ita) Lampre > > 9 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.13 > > 10 Jörg Jaksche (Ger) Team CSC > > 11 Yuriy Krivtsov (Ukr) Ag2r-Prevoyance 1.21 > > 12 Alexandre Moos (Swi) Phonak Hearing Systems 1.22 > > > > Final general classification > > > > 1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems > > 2 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.42 > > 3 Leonardo Piepoli (Ita) Saunier Duval-Prodir 2.17 > > 4 Tadej Valjavec (Slo) Phonak Hearing Systems 2.18 > > ... > > 7 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 3.30 > > 8 Francisco Mancebo (Spa) Illes Balears-Banesto > > 9 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Richard Adams <ackthpt@concentric.net> wrote:
>And Tyler won this race last year, too. Tyler's got to get through a >tour without crashing. And the heavily cobbled stage at the beginning of the Tour is not going to help him. >Richard Longwood wrote: >> Stage 5 - May 2: Lausanne-Lausanne ITT, 20 km >> >> Results >> 1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems 26.29 >> 2 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com 0.35 >> 3 Ronny Scholz (Ger) Gerolsteiner 0.53 >> 4 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 0.57 >> 5 Stefano Garzelli (Ita) Vini Caldirola-Nobili Rubinetterrie 1.00 >> 6 Rubens Bertogliati (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir >> 7 Carlos Sastre (Spa) Team CSC >> 8 Marco Pinotti (Ita) Lampre >> 9 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.13 >> 10 Jörg Jaksche (Ger) Team CSC >> 11 Yuriy Krivtsov (Ukr) Ag2r-Prevoyance 1.21 >> 12 Alexandre Moos (Swi) Phonak Hearing Systems 1.22 >> >> Final general classification >> >> 1 Tyler Hamilton (USA) Phonak Hearing Systems >> 2 Fabian Jeker (Swi) Saunier Duval-Prodir 1.42 >> 3 Leonardo Piepoli (Ita) Saunier Duval-Prodir 2.17 >> 4 Tadej Valjavec (Slo) Phonak Hearing Systems 2.18 >> ... >> 7 Ivan Basso (Ita) Team CSC 3.30 >> 8 Francisco Mancebo (Spa) Illes Balears-Banesto >> 9 Bradley McGee (Aus) FDJeux.com |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Blast, Sod and Balls. :-( Please indicate in the subject when posts contain results. If I'd have known I certainly wouldn't have read your post til after I'd watched the recorded Time Trial Thanks Jan |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jan wrote:
> Please indicate in the subject when posts contain results. > If I'd have known I certainly wouldn't have read your post til after I'd > watched the recorded Time Trial I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT for later viewing and blind the results in the meantime. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Robert Chung" <me2@privacy.net> wrote in message news:c737e9$hrl90$1@ID-226327.news.uni-berlin.de... > Jan wrote: > > > Please indicate in the subject when posts contain results. > > If I'd have known I certainly wouldn't have read your post til after I'd > > watched the recorded Time Trial > > I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT for later viewing > and blind the results in the meantime. > > Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !! Makes perfect sense to me... don't you ever tape programmes to watch later? ..Jan |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Robert Chung" <me2@privacy.net> wrote in message news:c737e9$hrl90$1@ID-226327.news.uni-berlin.de... > Jan wrote: > > > Please indicate in the subject when posts contain results. > > If I'd have known I certainly wouldn't have read your post til after I'd > > watched the recorded Time Trial > > I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT for later viewing > and blind the results in the meantime. > > Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !! Makes perfect sense to me... don't any of you ever tape programmes to watch later? ..Jan |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jan wrote:
> "Robert Chung" <me2@privacy.net> wrote >> >> I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT for later >> viewing and blind the results in the meantime. > > Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !! > Makes perfect sense to me... don't you ever tape programmes to watch > later? Road stages, yes, because I'm interested in the tactics, strategy, attacks, counters, collusion, and back-stabbing (especially the latter). Rarely TTs, but perhaps I'm missing something. Since I'm interested in the tactics, strategy, etc., I don't particularly worry if I learn the result ahead of time. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Robert Chung" <me2@privacy.net> wrote in message news:c73alq$glu9c$1@ID-226327.news.uni-berlin.de... > Jan wrote: > > "Robert Chung" <me2@privacy.net> wrote > >> > >> I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT for later > >> viewing and blind the results in the meantime. > > > > Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !! > > Makes perfect sense to me... don't you ever tape programmes to watch > > later? > > Road stages, yes, because I'm interested in the tactics, strategy, > attacks, counters, collusion, and back-stabbing (especially the latter). Agreed > Rarely TTs, but perhaps I'm missing something. Since I'm interested in the > tactics, strategy, etc., I don't particularly worry if I learn the result > ahead of time. We like shouting at the TV set and the commentator ( usually DD). Difficult if not impossible if you already know the result. Jan Jan |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
And now Tyler thinks he can win:
"My objective remains the Tour de France, I'll target a podium place but I also believe that I can win. I had to fight for victory here for Phonak." -- |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sun, 2 May 2004 17:50:17 +0100, "Jan" <jan@freeinternet.com> wrote:
> > > >"Robert Chung" <me2@privacy.net> wrote in message >news:c737e9$hrl90$1@ID-226327.news.uni-berlin.de... >> Jan wrote: >> >> > Please indicate in the subject when posts contain results. >> > If I'd have known I certainly wouldn't have read your post til after I'd >> > watched the recorded Time Trial >> >> I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT for later viewing >> and blind the results in the meantime. >> >> > >Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !! >Makes perfect sense to me... don't any of you ever tape programmes to watch >later? > Yep, but if it's a cycling race and I don't want to know the result I'd never come on r.b.r before watching it given the normal etiquette of posting the podium in the header... Regards! Stephen |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Steve McGinty" <steve_DOT_mcginty@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:20ha90luli1vae70omf0h2m6f1mh9h0pvu@4ax.com... > On Sun, 2 May 2004 17:50:17 +0100, "Jan" <jan@freeinternet.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >"Robert Chung" <me2@privacy.net> wrote in message > >news:c737e9$hrl90$1@ID-226327.news.uni-berlin.de... > >> Jan wrote: > >> > >> > Please indicate in the subject when posts contain results. > >> > If I'd have known I certainly wouldn't have read your post til after I'd > >> > watched the recorded Time Trial > >> > >> I don't quite understand why someone would record a TT for later viewing > >> and blind the results in the meantime. > >> > >> > > > >Because I was unable to watch it live on TV. !! > >Makes perfect sense to me... don't any of you ever tape programmes to watch > >later? > > > Yep, but if it's a cycling race and I don't want to know the result > I'd never come on r.b.r before watching it given the normal etiquette > of posting the podium in the header... > > Regards! > Stephen um??? Have you actually read the subject header to this post???? Jan |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Jan" <jan@freeinternet.com> wrote in message news:c73ifv$gg28e$1@ID-59553.news.uni-berlin.de... > > > um??? Have you actually read the subject header to this post???? > It is common for people in rbr to post the winners, and frequently the whole podium, in the header. In that case, your whole weekend would have been ruined anyway. |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Carl Sundquist" <carlsun@cox-internet.com> wrote in message news:109al1sifi0ou9e@corp.supernews.com... > > "Jan" <jan@freeinternet.com> wrote in message > news:c73ifv$gg28e$1@ID-59553.news.uni-berlin.de... > > > > > > um??? Have you actually read the subject header to this post???? > > > > It is common for people in rbr to post the winners, and frequently the whole > podium, in the header. In that case, your whole weekend would have been > ruined anyway. > No it only ruined Sunday!!LOL The heading was actually "Lance will have problems in July" , There was no mention of the Tour of Romandy. If there had of been, I wouldn't have opened the post But thats by the by now. Looking ahead, Would it be to much to ask for people not to actually post the results in the headings. Other NGs I read ( not cycling) will usually say something along the lines of "result of ??????? (inc.spoiler)" then type the result further down the page, so one can't accidently read it.iyswim Jan |
|