![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It is pretty funny that those who say "Damn! Musseuw would have won again
without that flat" don't take into account that PVP would certainly have beaten Museeuw in a two up sprint save for that flat. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Kunich <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote:
> It is pretty funny that those who say "Damn! Musseuw would have won again > without that flat" don't take into account that PVP would certainly have > beaten Museeuw in a two up sprint save for that flat. Huh? Museeuw flatted out of the lead group, which allowed him to be caught by Van Petegem. PVP couldn't have caught the lead group on his own. Or at least, he didn't, even with Museeuw to work with. The race-aftermath commentary on this group is even more omnisciently incoherent than usual today. It's good to see you gang have been training hard and are in fine form for July. Where's Henry anyway? He would have liked this, but he disappeared over a month ago and www.lhchang.com is gone. SDSteve? Anybody? Bueller? |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Benjamin Weiner wrote: > > Tom Kunich <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote: > > It is pretty funny that those who say "Damn! Musseuw would have won again > > without that flat" don't take into account that PVP would certainly have > > beaten Museeuw in a two up sprint save for that flat. > > Huh? Museeuw flatted out of the lead group, which allowed him to > be caught by Van Petegem. PVP couldn't have caught the lead group > on his own. Or at least, he didn't, even with Museeuw to work with. > > The race-aftermath commentary on this group is even more > omnisciently incoherent than usual today. It's good to see you > gang have been training hard and are in fine form for July. tom sometimes will say things to get a certain response he wants. pvp had his own flat while off the front on an attack and yet managed to get back to the group on his own, drop them, catch museeuw (what happened to wesseman btw?). who knows what he would have done without his own bad luck flat? maybe he's looking for something like that? if you spend too much time trying to guess what he wants you'll go batty, though. hh |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"h squared" <peckledoggyremovetoreply@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:407A7962.EC5EF931@hotmail.com... > > > Benjamin Weiner wrote: > > > > Tom Kunich <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > It is pretty funny that those who say "Damn! Musseuw would have won again > > > without that flat" don't take into account that PVP would certainly have > > > beaten Museeuw in a two up sprint save for that flat. > > > > Huh? Museeuw flatted out of the lead group, which allowed him to > > be caught by Van Petegem. PVP couldn't have caught the lead group > > on his own. Or at least, he didn't, even with Museeuw to work with. > > > > The race-aftermath commentary on this group is even more > > omnisciently incoherent than usual today. It's good to see you > > gang have been training hard and are in fine form for July. > > tom sometimes will say things to get a certain response he wants. pvp > had his own flat while off the front on an attack and yet managed to get > back to the group on his own, drop them, catch museeuw (what happened to > wesseman btw?). who knows what he would have done without his own bad > luck flat? maybe he's looking for something like that? if you spend too > much time trying to guess what he wants you'll go batty, though. > > hh Tom would often think things had happened that had not. Very frustrating. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<JOnec.6371$A_4.1280@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> It is pretty funny that those who say "Damn! Musseuw would have won again > without that flat" don't take into account that PVP would certainly have > beaten Museeuw in a two up sprint save for that flat. There no "certainly" in cycling, otherwise Museeuw wouldn't have flatted in the last 100s meters of the last pavee section. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Elizabeth Ann" <Free@Last.com> wrote in message
news:Fcvec.4951$zj3.195@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net... > > Tom would often think things had happened that had not. Very frustrating. It's all in the drugs Brian. Everyone that rides a bike except you of course, is on drugs. That's why you have to settle for riding wth 12 year olds in order to find someone you can beat every once in awhile. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
h squared <peckledoggyremovetoreply@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:407A7962.EC5EF931@hotmail.com: > tom sometimes will say things to get a certain response he wants. pvp > had his own flat while off the front on an attack and yet managed to > get back to the group on his own, drop them, catch museeuw (what > happened to wesseman btw?). who knows what he would have done without > his own bad luck flat? maybe he's looking for something like that? if > you spend too much time trying to guess what he wants you'll go batty, > though. I think he wants to convince people he is smart and persuade them to his point of view. However, if he succeeds on either count, then the reader is surely batty to start with. But I must be batty since I spent time trying to figure that out. NS |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:amAec.6286$k05.707@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... > "Elizabeth Ann" <Free@Last.com> wrote in message > news:Fcvec.4951$zj3.195@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net... > > > > Tom would often think things had happened that had not. Very frustrating. > > It's all in the drugs Brian. Everyone that rides a bike except you of > course, is on drugs. That's why you have to settle for riding wth 12 year > olds in order to find someone you can beat every once in awhile. That is funny coming from the best known cat 5 for lifer. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Chris" <chrismcreynolds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:407b3e7a$0$79073$812600b3@news.nntpaccess.com... > > That is funny coming from the best known cat 5 for lifer. You must have learned a lot about bicycle racing in your long pro career. Oh, wait, you're just some flunky amatuer bicycle racer who needs to believe that somehow a Cat 3 knows more than a Cat 4. Does it hurt to have a brain that puny? |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
> "Chris" <chrismcreynolds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:407b3e7a$0$- > 79073$812600b3@news.nntpaccess.comnews:407b3e7a$0$79073$812600b3@news. n- > ntpaccess.com... > > > > That is funny coming from the best known cat 5 for lifer. > You must have learned a lot about bicycle racing in your long pro > career. Oh, wait, you're just some flunky amatuer bicycle racer who > needs to believe that somehow a Cat 3 knows more than a Cat 4. Does it > hurt to have a brain that puny? Now now girls...handbags at dawn. .. From what I could see PvP was miles stronger than JM and in fact he looked stronger than anyone else in the race. Like last year he just rode through the other riders like an adult in a kids race. There is no doubt in my mind that if he had not flatted that he would have won again. -- |
|