Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Road Racing > rec.bicycles.racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Re: Compact crankset versus triple

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-04.-2004, 12:52 AM   #1
Tom Kunich
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Compact crankset versus triple

"Shayana Kadidal" <dershanek@aol.com> wrote in message
news:e59b350a.0404011926.1d078bab@posting.google.com...
> Re. Kunich's comment, I just bought an Ultegra junior 9-speed cassette
> (Excel has them in stock). 14-15-16-17-18-19-21-23-25, kind of
> two-thirds corncob with the usual lower gears. Like others here, I
> only use the 12 on two or three short 40mph downhills a week, and I
> don't really need it or the 13. It seems to me that almost every
> amateur would be better off with a 16 than a 12.--Shayana Kadidal


Oh, oh, last time I said that we saw tons of opposition telling us that
there was no way you could place in the top 100% without an 11 tooth.


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04.-2004, 01:45 PM   #2
Bestest Handsander
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Compact crankset versus triple

I checked Excel and could only find the Tiaga version. They mention it's
also available in the Ulegra, but I couldn't find it. I emailed them, and
they responded saying they do not carry the Ulegra version. Are you sure
yours isn't Tiagra?

"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:r%fbc.12397$lt2.6014@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> "Shayana Kadidal" <dershanek@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:e59b350a.0404011926.1d078bab@posting.google.com...
> > Re. Kunich's comment, I just bought an Ultegra junior 9-speed cassette
> > (Excel has them in stock). 14-15-16-17-18-19-21-23-25, kind of
> > two-thirds corncob with the usual lower gears. Like others here, I
> > only use the 12 on two or three short 40mph downhills a week, and I
> > don't really need it or the 13. It seems to me that almost every
> > amateur would be better off with a 16 than a 12.--Shayana Kadidal

>
> Oh, oh, last time I said that we saw tons of opposition telling us that
> there was no way you could place in the top 100% without an 11 tooth.
>
>



  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04.-2004, 01:17 PM   #3
Shayana Kadidal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Compact crankset versus triple

Word. I phoned them up to buy it. The website says that the Ultegra is
also available, you just can't order it online, apparently.--Shayana
Kadidal

---------------------------

>Shimano Tiagra Cassette 14-25 junior gear

260 grams, 9 speed. Keep your Junior legal! Lockring included.

14,15,16,17,18,19,21,23,25
Please Note:
This cassette requires the Park FR-5 for installation and removal.

Also available in the Ultegra version.<

http://www.excelsports.com/new.asp?...ajor=1&minor=10

---------------------------

"Bestest Handsander" <none@u.biz> wrote in message news:<LNydnbx5yLLv3PPdRVn-hA@aros.net>...
> I checked Excel and could only find the Tiaga version. They mention it's
> also available in the Ulegra, but I couldn't find it. I emailed them, and
> they responded saying they do not carry the Ulegra version. Are you sure
> yours isn't Tiagra?

  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04.-2004, 02:40 AM   #4
gwhite
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Compact crankset versus triple

"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<r%fbc.12397$lt2.6014@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> "Shayana Kadidal" <dershanek@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:e59b350a.0404011926.1d078bab@posting.google.com...
> > Re. Kunich's comment, I just bought an Ultegra junior 9-speed cassette
> > (Excel has them in stock). 14-15-16-17-18-19-21-23-25, kind of
> > two-thirds corncob with the usual lower gears. Like others here, I
> > only use the 12 on two or three short 40mph downhills a week, and I
> > don't really need it or the 13. It seems to me that almost every
> > amateur would be better off with a 16 than a 12.--Shayana Kadidal

>
> Oh, oh, last time I said that we saw tons of opposition telling us that
> there was no way you could place in the top 100% without an 11 tooth.


No one said that, or even close. Metcalf said he "needed" an 11t for
a specific event. No one is going to forget what was wrote. So
don't think a little passage of time will permit a complete distortion
of history to suit your fancy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04.-2004, 05:41 AM   #5
Tom Kunich
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Compact crankset versus triple

"gwhite" <gwhite@ti.com> wrote in message
news:698b8866.0404050940.69c958ed@posting.google.com...
> "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:<r%fbc.12397$lt2.6014@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> > "Shayana Kadidal" <dershanek@aol.com> wrote in message
> > news:e59b350a.0404011926.1d078bab@posting.google.com...
> > > Re. Kunich's comment, I just bought an Ultegra junior 9-speed cassette
> > > (Excel has them in stock). 14-15-16-17-18-19-21-23-25, kind of
> > > two-thirds corncob with the usual lower gears. Like others here, I
> > > only use the 12 on two or three short 40mph downhills a week, and I
> > > don't really need it or the 13. It seems to me that almost every
> > > amateur would be better off with a 16 than a 12.--Shayana Kadidal

> >
> > Oh, oh, last time I said that we saw tons of opposition telling us that
> > there was no way you could place in the top 100% without an 11 tooth.

>
> No one said that, or even close. Metcalf said he "needed" an 11t for
> a specific event. No one is going to forget what was wrote. So
> don't think a little passage of time will permit a complete distortion
> of history to suit your fancy.


Metcalf was a pro rider in case you forgot. After Kevin said that there were
OCCASSIONALLY races in which he needed an 11, two thirds of you idiots
thereby concluded that your legs could turn them over and you would need one
on any racing you did as well.

Don't think that your idiocy is going to be forgotten because of the passage
of time. And the history contained in Google.


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04.-2004, 12:32 PM   #6
gwhite
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Compact crankset versus triple

"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<kwjcc.16082$Dv2.13510@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> "gwhite" <gwhite@ti.com> wrote in message
> news:698b8866.0404050940.69c958ed@posting.google.com...
> > "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote in message

> news:<r%fbc.12397$lt2.6014@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> > > "Shayana Kadidal" <dershanek@aol.com> wrote in message
> > > news:e59b350a.0404011926.1d078bab@posting.google.com...
> > > > Re. Kunich's comment, I just bought an Ultegra junior 9-speed cassette
> > > > (Excel has them in stock). 14-15-16-17-18-19-21-23-25, kind of
> > > > two-thirds corncob with the usual lower gears. Like others here, I
> > > > only use the 12 on two or three short 40mph downhills a week, and I
> > > > don't really need it or the 13. It seems to me that almost every
> > > > amateur would be better off with a 16 than a 12.--Shayana Kadidal
> > >
> > > Oh, oh, last time I said that we saw tons of opposition telling us that
> > > there was no way you could place in the top 100% without an 11 tooth.

> >
> > No one said that, or even close. Metcalf said he "needed" an 11t for
> > a specific event. No one is going to forget what was wrote. So
> > don't think a little passage of time will permit a complete distortion
> > of history to suit your fancy.

>
> Metcalf was a pro rider in case you forgot.


He was a Cat 1 and he got beat that day by an 50-something old Scott Hennessy (sp?).

> After Kevin said that there were
> OCCASSIONALLY races in which he needed an 11, two thirds of you idiots
> thereby concluded that your legs could turn them over and you would need one
> on any racing you did as well.


Good grief.

> Don't think that your idiocy is going to be forgotten because of the passage
> of time. And the history contained in Google.


Okay then. Post that "history."
  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:05 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com