![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <msudncGUmulz2PHdRVn-tA@sti.net>, "Sierraman" <riposa@sti.net>
wrote: > I wouldn't be explaining it to you if you wouldn't of begged for it, but > since you did I tell you. It's actually more of a subliminal joke but in > reality there is a lot of truth to it. I don't lose any sleep over it, but > since certain sub-stalkers bring it up repeatedly, it's gets a little old. > It's hard to forget something that is constantly thrown in your face by > sub-stalkers. I think your definition of "stalker" is very different than that of most people. What you describe of Henry's behavior falls into the category (probably) of just being obnoxious. Which, in general, isn't such a bad thing when taken with a grain of salt. I'd bet most people would think of a stalker as someone who takes being a "fan" to a very different level (some might even think of it as an obsessive level). Anyway, I think that most of the "stalker" talk directed at you, Bruce, is really nothing more than heckling. -- tanx, Howard Q: Why did the metalhead cross the road? A: Because he's a gullible moron who'll buy anything with a skull on it. remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
|