Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Equipment > rec.bicycles.tech
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Bike Cadence of 172?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 30-04.-2004, 04:32 AM   #1
Tom Nakashima
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bike Cadence of 172?

My friend sent me over his training data. The chart says he has a cadence
of 172 rpm. Is that possible?
-tom


  Reply With Quote
Old 30-04.-2004, 05:02 AM   #2
David Kerber
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Bike Cadence of 172?

In article <c6rl8s$m2a$1@news.Stanford.EDU>, tom@slac.stanford.edu
says...
> My friend sent me over his training data. The chart says he has a cadence
> of 172 rpm. Is that possible?


How was the data collected? A lot of runners count each foot impact, so
they come up with a number exactly twice what a cyclist at the same
cadence would register.

Going down a hill and not putting any pressure on the pedals, it
probably is possible for some people to hit 172. Mark says he can hit
200 on a stationary bike. I can only hit about 145 on the trainer, but
my bike has rather long crank arms. I suppose a top trackie might even
make some significant power at that cadence, but I doubt any normal
human would.

--
Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the
newsgroups if possible).
  Reply With Quote
Old 30-04.-2004, 06:01 AM   #3
crystal_tears_
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Bike Cadence of 172?

Don't know if it's possible or not but if so sounds totally
ridiculous to me. There's no need to ever go above a 110 rpm cadence
for road biking.



--


  Reply With Quote
Old 30-04.-2004, 06:20 AM   #4
Thaimaan Norppa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Bike Cadence of 172?

Your friend might ought try some bigger rings
on the cranks of his one speeder...
-N


  Reply With Quote
Old 30-04.-2004, 09:33 AM   #5
Nick Payne
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Bike Cadence of 172?

Tom Nakashima wrote:
> My friend sent me over his training data. The chart says he has a cadence
> of 172 rpm. Is that possible?


Yes. Max short term power is actually developed at a pretty high
cadence. Track sprinters regularly hit 160rpm in a sprint (70kph in a
52-15, for example). If you don't actually have to develop power, higher
cadences are possible. I've seen 203 on the display of a cadence speedo
when just trying for max rpm down a hill.

Nick
  Reply With Quote
Old 30-04.-2004, 07:56 PM   #6
Evan Evans
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Bike Cadence of 172?

With my road bike on a trainer i reach a max cadence in the 170's.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05.-2004, 07:20 AM   #7
Rick Onanian
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Bike Cadence of 172?

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:01:16 GMT, crystal_tears_
<usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote:
>Don't know if it's possible or not but if so sounds totally
>ridiculous to me. There's no need to ever go above a 110 rpm cadence
>for road biking.


On almost every ride, I apply power past 110 rpm in my highest gear,
52x11 on 700x23c tires. I've got a good aerobelly and lots of hills.
--
Rick Onanian
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05.-2004, 04:21 PM   #8
armchair_spacem
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Bike Cadence of 172?

Tom Nakashima wrote:
> My friend sent me over his training data. The chart says he has a
> cadence of 172 rpm. Is that possible? -tom




I don't want to rain on your buddy's parade but is he using a cordless
computer? There are a couple of spots on one of my regular rides where
RF interference plays up with my Polar S710. This morning it tells me
I'm spinning at 80kmh at a cadence of 160 at 120% of max heart rate.
Unless I slipped into some alternate universe for that minute or two I'm
pretty sure it's interference giving me those numbers.



--


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-05.-2004, 02:28 PM   #9
Bestest Handsander
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Bike Cadence of 172?


"crystal_tears_" <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote in message
news:w2ekc.5$KV5.4@fe02.usenetserver.com...
> Don't know if it's possible or not but if so sounds totally
> ridiculous to me. There's no need to ever go above a 110 rpm cadence
> for road biking.
>


For mere mortals perhaps, but don't Millar and Armstrong maintain 130 or so
during their time trials?


  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:53 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com