![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
My girlfriend (5'4" and my 30" inseam jeans don't drag on the ground
when she wears them) would like to buy a bicycle with gears for transportation arround town. I'm a roadie and she'd like to have the same efficiency I do if/when we start doing longer rides together - hence the desire for a road bike instead of a hybrid. She doesn't know if she'll get that far and doesn't want to worry about the bike so we want a used one. Presta valves and 700c wheels would be good. The questions are 1) What sort of top tube + stem length are we looking for (I'm 6" taller with the same inseam, so I'm thinking the dimension up top is going to matter a lot more than seat tube length) and 2) what price range are we looking at (brifter or downtube shifter). -- <a href="http://www.poohsticks.org/drew/">Home Page</a> Life is a terminal sexually transmitted disease. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <ku9p6c.ok62.ln@revolt.poohsticks.org>,
drew@revolt.poohsticks.org (Drew Eckhardt) wrote: > My girlfriend (5'4" and my 30" inseam jeans don't drag on the ground > when she wears them) would like to buy a bicycle > I'm a roadie and she'd like to have the same efficiency I do > The questions are 1) What sort of top tube + stem length are we looking > for (I'm 6" taller with the same inseam, so I'm thinking the dimension > up top is going to matter a lot more than seat tube length) and 2) what price > range are we looking at (brifter or downtube shifter). 1) um, about a 48 cm frame, give or take a couple of cm? 2) $0-3000 for a decent bike with 700c (road) wheels and a nice frame. I know that second answer sounds like I'm joking, but I took home a thrown-away bike that was an early-80s Nishiki with downtube (non-indexed) shifters, good aluminum wheels, and it was even about the right size for your wife. At the upper end, well, you could buy a new machine with Dura-Ace or Record and spend at least $3000. Used index-shifting road bikes (typically early Shimano 6-speed; my friend Dave points out these frequently have shifters on the verge of failure when they get dumped) seem to go for $100-300. You can upgrade a nice old bike for several hundred in parts and a bit of elbow grease to new dt/barcon 9-speed; the difficulty is dependent on whether you have to swap freehubs or get a freehub-hub or wheel. Other parts necessary are shifters, derailleurs, and a new cassette. -- Ryan Cousineau, rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.sfu.ca/~rcousine/wiredcola/ President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 00:24:07 -0700, Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca>
wrote: >1) um, about a 48 cm frame, give or take a couple of cm? I think that the 48 cm frame willl be too small. The 30" pants inseam is equivalent to ~33" inseam to floor. That would be a 54-56 cm bicycle. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <8t5290d69hs8c21s9s3lh2n3lekmigtkcc@4ax.com>,
Paul Kopit <p.kopit@SPAMverizon.net> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 00:24:07 -0700, Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> > wrote: > > >1) um, about a 48 cm frame, give or take a couple of cm? > > I think that the 48 cm frame willl be too small. The 30" pants inseam > is equivalent to ~33" inseam to floor. That would be a 54-56 cm > bicycle. Are you sure? The proof is in the fitting, but I have a 30" pants inseam, and I tend to ride 52-54 cm frames. One bit of confusion might be that there are two ways of measuring frames (centre-of-BB to centre-of-top-tube, or centre-of-BB to top-of seat-tube; these are abbreviated C-C and C-T, and generally come out a few cm different). Another bit of confusion is that this bike would be for a woman, and in general (though not in all cases) women run to shorter torsos (and longer legs) than men of the same height. Thus, in a conventionally sized frame, a woman might expect to need to get a bit smaller size (to get a shorter top tube) and more exposed seatpost (see, compact design benefits most women . You can alsochange to a shorter stem, but it's usually easier to raise a seat than to shorten a stem. Finally, small bikes tend towards women-specific geometry anyway, so it may be moot in the end. Frames in this size range tend to look a lot like compact-geometry frames, so nowadays you could probably get a 48 cm frame to fit anybody between 5'2" and 5'8". -- Ryan Cousineau, rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.sfu.ca/~rcousine/wiredcola/ President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Drew Eckhardt wrote:
> My girlfriend (5'4" and my 30" inseam jeans don't drag on the ground > when she wears them) would like to buy a bicycle with gears for > transportation arround town. > > I'm a roadie and she'd like to have the same efficiency I do if/when we start > doing longer rides together - hence the desire for a road bike instead of a > hybrid. She doesn't know if she'll get that far and doesn't want to worry > about the bike so we want a used one. Presta valves and 700c wheels would be > good. > > The questions are 1) What sort of top tube + stem length are we looking > for (I'm 6" taller with the same inseam, so I'm thinking the dimension > up top is going to matter a lot more than seat tube length) and 2) what price > range are we looking at (brifter or downtube shifter). I won't take up the challenge of suggesting a frame size without seeing the person to be fitted. Then one will find that the ideal frame size may vary depending on the manufacturer, for the same person. Even period of manufacture will affect things. Appears that top tubes have gotten longer these past years. My inseam (crotch bone to floor) is 85 cm (about 33 1/2 in) and I am 178 cm (5 foot 10). The perfect frame for me, years ago, was 56 cm, if it was an Alan. But I found myself choosing a Colnago of size 54 cm (in fact 52,5 cm from centre bb to top of top tube) a while back. Seat post sticks a long way out. Not at all the same size as the Alan, but this frame suits me much better, due to the correct length of top tube and where I can put the stem (quite low). Best advice is to get to a proper cycle shop whose personnel are well-qualified to see what your girlfriend needs and can recognise good fit vs. bad fit when she sits on a candidate bike. /Robert |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
.... I think that the 48 cm frame willl be too small. The 30" pants
inseam > is equivalent to ~33" inseam to floor. That would be a 54-56 cm > bicycle... 54-56cm is way too big for a 30" inseam. How do you get an additional 3" to the floor? I have a 29.5" inseam and I am 5'5". I have never been able to ride a frame larger than a 50cm (and even that was too large). My last road frame was a 46cm. It was the best fitting frame I ever had. I finally had an inch or so of clearance between the top tube and my crotch. Women often ride a smaller frame than a guy, since they often need a shorter top tube (as found on smaller frames). I know you are looking for a complete bike, but I have my Reynods 631 frame with carbon fork for sale cheap. It has less than 30 miles on it (it's so nice, I could sell it as new - I also have a set of brakes and other misc parts.) Even though it is the nicest riding road frame I have owned, I find I can no longer ride a standard bike. I am switching back to a recumbent. Let me know if you are interested. artisticwill@worldnet.att.net |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
drew@revolt.poohsticks.org (Drew Eckhardt) wrote in message news:<ku9p6c.ok62.ln@revolt.poohsticks.org>...
> My girlfriend (5'4" and my 30" inseam jeans don't drag on the ground > when she wears them) would like to buy a bicycle with gears for > transportation arround town. > > The questions are 1) What sort of top tube + stem length are we looking > for (I'm 6" taller with the same inseam, so I'm thinking the dimension > up top is going to matter a lot more than seat tube length) and 2) what price > range are we looking at (brifter or downtube shifter). I would agree with the other poster who recommended a 48/49cm frame size. I have 31" legs and find my 49cm Bianchi Axis very comfortable. On the other hand my road bike is 54cm Habanero. The Axis is a much better around town bike because I don't have issues at stop lights- it takes much less coordination to get going and if I have to put down a leg in a hurry it's just less intimidating. She's going to have a fairly short torso so the smaller frame will mean less stretching which new cyclists always seem to find very uncomfortable. Along those same lines I'd recommend looking at some of the Specialized Sirrus and Seqouia models. They have flat bar and road bar models all of which have rack and fender mounts, 700c tires, good brakes and road tires. They are also reasonably priced. My only objection to them is the lack of choice in groups (Shimano only). |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 29 Apr 2004 11:30:32 -0700, artisticwill@worldnet.att.net
(rocketman58) wrote: > >54-56cm is way too big for a 30" inseam. How do you get an additional >3" to the floor? > >I have a 29.5" inseam and I am 5'5". I have never been able to ride a >frame larger than a 50cm (and even that was too large). My last road >frame was a 46cm. It was the best fitting frame I ever had. I >finally had an inch or so of clearance between the top tube and my >crotch. My trouser inseam is 30" and I ride a 55/56/57 cm frame measured center to top. A 56 cm toptube with an 11 cm stem or 55 with a 12. My height is 5' 9" and shrinking. My wife is 5'5" tall. She can ride a 49 cm frame only but needs a 12 cm stem. She has short legs and long torso. It's usually opposite for ladies. |
|