Brooks saddles - comparison?

Mark H.

The answer must be so simple that I'm looking past it. Countless hours,
days, spent perusing Google for the past 10 year's newsgroup posts about
Brooks saddles, plus the various dealers sites, reveal much about Brooks
saddles, but...how to choose?

There're those that hate Brooks and those that love. Of the lovers, some
found them comfortable right out of the box, others only after a couple
thousand miles...some wave a can of Proofide at them every year or two, some
soak them in brine for 12 hours before each ride...some need a wide
platform, some narrow...some models are recommended for the more
"aggressive" rider, then not...and so on, but...

Me, I'm 6', 175 pounds and engage in club rides (training/recreational)
every week, about 18 mph pace. I'm "average" build; my "sit bones" not
wide, accommodating any of the Brooks models, I believe.

Should I try the Swift? Looks like a good start. What about the B-17, Team
Pro? And why? I had a Brooks, rusty memory cells may recall, some decades
ago with my vintage 10-speed; at least I'm leather saddle friendly.

I haven't found much in the way of a comparative analysis between the
models, what have I missed? Testimonials/advice about how folks came to
choose their particular model are very much welcome.

Sorry for potential repetitiveness of subject matter.

Thanks in advance.

Keith Boone

On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 03:20:34 +0000, Mark H. wrote:

> The answer must be so simple that I'm looking past it. Countless hours,
> days, spent perusing Google for the past 10 year's newsgroup posts about
> Brooks saddles, plus the various dealers sites, reveal much about Brooks
> saddles, but...how to choose?
>
> There're those that hate Brooks and those that love. Of the lovers, some
> found them comfortable right out of the box, others only after a couple
> thousand miles...some wave a can of Proofide at them every year or two, some
> soak them in brine for 12 hours before each ride...some need a wide
> platform, some narrow...some models are recommended for the more
> "aggressive" rider, then not...and so on, but...
>
> Me, I'm 6', 175 pounds and engage in club rides (training/recreational)
> every week, about 18 mph pace. I'm "average" build; my "sit bones" not
> wide, accommodating any of the Brooks models, I believe.
>
> Should I try the Swift? Looks like a good start. What about the B-17, Team
> Pro? And why? I had a Brooks, rusty memory cells may recall, some decades
> ago with my vintage 10-speed; at least I'm leather saddle friendly.
>
> I haven't found much in the way of a comparative analysis between the
> models, what have I missed? Testimonials/advice about how folks came to
> choose their particular model are very much welcome.
>
> Sorry for potential repetitiveness of subject matter.
>
> Thanks in advance.

I have a Brooks Team Professional that has not broken in after 10,000 km
of riding. The leather is just too thick. I recently bought a B17 and
after only 300 km I can feel it beginning to break in and soften up. I
like it so much, I ordered another one today for my second bike. I use
only Brooks Proofide for treating the leather, so it is possible that the
Team Professional might break in if soaked in oil as some people suggest.

Nick Payne

Mark H. wrote:

> The answer must be so simple that I'm looking past it. Countless hours,
> days, spent perusing Google for the past 10 year's newsgroup posts about
> Brooks saddles, plus the various dealers sites, reveal much about Brooks
> saddles, but...how to choose?
>
> There're those that hate Brooks and those that love. Of the lovers, some
> found them comfortable right out of the box, others only after a couple
> thousand miles...some wave a can of Proofide at them every year or two, some
> soak them in brine for 12 hours before each ride...some need a wide
> platform, some narrow...some models are recommended for the more
> "aggressive" rider, then not...and so on, but...
>
> Me, I'm 6', 175 pounds and engage in club rides (training/recreational)
> every week, about 18 mph pace. I'm "average" build; my "sit bones" not
> wide, accommodating any of the Brooks models, I believe.
>
> Should I try the Swift? Looks like a good start. What about the B-17, Team
> Pro? And why? I had a Brooks, rusty memory cells may recall, some decades
> ago with my vintage 10-speed; at least I'm leather saddle friendly.
>
> I haven't found much in the way of a comparative analysis between the
> models, what have I missed? Testimonials/advice about how folks came to
> choose their particular model are very much welcome.

I presently have Brooks Pro on two bikes, Swifts on two bikes, B-17 on
one, Pro S on one. None of them are uncomfortable - I've sat on all of
them for brevets of several hundred kilometres without discomfort. I
found the wider ones - the B-17 and Pro S - more immediately
comfortable. First ride out of the box they feel good. The Pro and Swift
seem to take a couple of months of use to reach the same point.

I'm 178cm and 65kg, so fairly skinny.

Nick

dg

I have the B17 Titanium. Almost immediately comfortable. It's black and
lighter than the standard. I think it looks fine on a road bike. Have a
traditional honey B17 on my mtb. Very happy with both. BTW, only used
proofhide as recommended by Brooks.

"Mark H." <hwtspam@stop.att.net> wrote in message
news:6kkjc.49532$um3.974701@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> The answer must be so simple that I'm looking past it. Countless hours,
> days, spent perusing Google for the past 10 year's newsgroup posts about
> Brooks saddles, plus the various dealers sites, reveal much about Brooks
> saddles, but...how to choose?
>
> There're those that hate Brooks and those that love. Of the lovers, some
> found them comfortable right out of the box, others only after a couple
> thousand miles...some wave a can of Proofide at them every year or two,
some
> soak them in brine for 12 hours before each ride...some need a wide
> platform, some narrow...some models are recommended for the more
> "aggressive" rider, then not...and so on, but...
>
> Me, I'm 6', 175 pounds and engage in club rides (training/recreational)
> every week, about 18 mph pace. I'm "average" build; my "sit bones" not
> wide, accommodating any of the Brooks models, I believe.
>
> Should I try the Swift? Looks like a good start. What about the B-17,
Team
> Pro? And why? I had a Brooks, rusty memory cells may recall, some
decades
> ago with my vintage 10-speed; at least I'm leather saddle friendly.
>
> I haven't found much in the way of a comparative analysis between the
> models, what have I missed? Testimonials/advice about how folks came to
> choose their particular model are very much welcome.
>
> Sorry for potential repetitiveness of subject matter.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Steve Knight

On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 04:18:30 GMT, Nick Payne <someone@nowhere.au> wrote:

>I presently have Brooks Pro on two bikes, Swifts on two bikes, B-17 on
>one, Pro S on one. None of them are uncomfortable -
I have been thinking of getting a swift I am a big guy and need a narrow saddle
to keep my crotch from rubbing. I have the team pro but it is pretty wide.

--
Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes
Custom made wooden planes at reasonable prices
See http://www.knight-toolworks.com For prices and ordering instructions.

Steve Shapiro

Originally posted by Dg I have the B17 Titanium. Almost immediately
comfortable. It's black and lighter than the standard. I think it looks
fine on a road bike. Have a traditional honey B17 on my mtb. Very happy
with both. BTW, only used proofhide as recommended by Brooks.

"Mark H." <hwtspam@stop.att.net> wrote in message news:6kkjc.49532$um3.974701@bgtnsc04-
news:6kkjc.49532$um3.974701@bgtnsc04- news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> The answer must be so simple that I'm looking past it. Countless
> hours, days, spent perusing Google for the past 10 year's newsgroup
> posts about Brooks saddles, plus the various dealers sites, reveal
> much about Brooks saddles, but...how to choose?

snip Dg top posted: BTW, only used proofhide as recommended by Brooks.

Why? I've got 2 B17 Champion Specials. These are B17s with thicker
leather on a steel frame. I like them both. When new, I dunked them in
neets foot oil for 20 to 30 minutes before using them. It's what I did
to my baseball gloves as a kid and it worked then. Also, Sheldon Brown
recommends it. Now, I can recommend it for saddles too.

Of my B17s, one was comfortable from the start. The second was not,
taking about 200 miles to "break in." The leather on the second had a
stiffer feel (read hard as a rock) then the first. Neither saddle has
sagged or required any tension adjustment, but only the first has any
miles on it (around 2K.)

Steve Shapiro



--

Bill Putnam

"Mark H." <hwtspam@stop.att.net> wrote in message news:<6kkjc.49532$um3.974701@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
> ...how to choose?
....
> Should I try the Swift? Looks like a good start. What about the B-17, Team
> Pro? And why? ...
> I haven't found much in the way of a comparative analysis between the
> models, what have I missed? Testimonials/advice about how folks came to
> choose their particular model are very much welcome.

In my experience the variation between Brooks saddles even within a
specific model is a bigger factor than the difference between models.
I've had Brooks Pro's, B17's, and B72's, and each and every saddle was
unique, both in shape and thickness of the leather.

My first Brooks, a B17 narrow, I bought in 1979. I still use it on a
daily basis commuting. The leather on that saddle is fairly soft. I
bought another B17 narrow saddle about 10 years ago. The leather on
that saddle was substantially thicker, and I gave up trying to get it
to break in after two years of putting it on my commuting bike for a
few weeks, taking it off for a few weeks, and so on. I have three
Brooks Pro's and those have been generally comfortable but I suspect
this is by chance rather than the fact that they are Pro's vs. B17's.
I had two B72's on two different 3 speeds (upright bars) and with
these one saddle had much thicker leather than the other. Again, the
one with the thicker leather I found less comfortable than the one
with thinner leather.

I would encourage you to try out a Brooks saddle-a good bike shop will
let you do that if you're careful and don't scratch up the saddle. If
the first one isn't comfortable after a few days of at least moderate
length rides (say 30 miles) try a different one. What it comes down
to is that what is comfortable for one person may not be comfortable
for the next, and there is a substantial variation between each Brooks
saddle.

Note too that if you want your saddle to last it will take some care.
These saddles will be damaged if left out in the rain or if you ride
in the rain without fenders (mudguards). If you have a bike without
fenders at least put a plastic bag over the saddle and tie the bag
tight around the seatpost to keep it from getting soaked. I apply
Proofhide on occasion and have found that with these precautions
(along with not messing with the adjustment at the front of the
saddle) these saddles last a long time. I know that some day I may
wear out my first Brooks saddle, but with 25 years of nearly daily use
commuting, racing, and touring, and more use still left I consider
that to be a good value.

Sheldon Brown has a nice write up on leather saddles at
http://www.sheldonbrown.com/leather.html

Bill Putnam

dvt

Mark H. wrote:
> Me, I'm 6', 175 pounds and engage in club rides (training/recreational)
> every week, about 18 mph pace. I'm "average" build; my "sit bones" not
> wide, accommodating any of the Brooks models, I believe.
>
> Should I try the Swift?

No one will be able to give you *the* perfect answer. It's too dependent
on the individual butt shape, riding position, and personal preference.

Regarding the Swift, I have one. I'm very similar in size, just slightly
taller and lighter than you. I find the Swift to be a bit on the narrow
side, but still fairly comfortable. I find the B66 too wide on a
drop-bar bike, but I'll bet it's pretty sweet for a more upright position.

I have only sampled the extremes (Swift = narrow and B66 = wide).
Someday I hope to work the middle ground, if, like you, I ever figure
out how to choose. They're too expensive for the old trial and error
routine.

--
Dave
dvt at psu dot edu

Jack Fortune

On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 03:20:34 GMT, "Mark H." <hwtspam@stop.att.net>
wrote:

>The answer must be so simple that I'm looking past it. Countless hours,
>days, spent perusing Google for the past 10 year's newsgroup posts about
>Brooks saddles, plus the various dealers sites, reveal much about Brooks
>saddles, but...how to choose?
>

Contact the folks at Wallingford Bicycle Parts:

http://www.wallbike.com/

You can order any Brooks saddle and try it. They offer a full refund
within six months if you don't find a saddle to your liking...

Jack Fortune
Eugene, Oregon

Zog The Undeniable

Mark H. wrote:

> The answer must be so simple that I'm looking past it. Countless hours,
> days, spent perusing Google for the past 10 year's newsgroup posts about
> Brooks saddles, plus the various dealers sites, reveal much about Brooks
> saddles, but...how to choose?
>
> There're those that hate Brooks and those that love. Of the lovers, some
> found them comfortable right out of the box, others only after a couple
> thousand miles...some wave a can of Proofide at them every year or two, some
> soak them in brine for 12 hours before each ride...some need a wide
> platform, some narrow...some models are recommended for the more
> "aggressive" rider, then not...and so on, but...
>
> Me, I'm 6', 175 pounds and engage in club rides (training/recreational)
> every week, about 18 mph pace. I'm "average" build; my "sit bones" not
> wide, accommodating any of the Brooks models, I believe.
>
> Should I try the Swift? Looks like a good start. What about the B-17, Team
> Pro? And why? I had a Brooks, rusty memory cells may recall, some decades
> ago with my vintage 10-speed; at least I'm leather saddle friendly.
>
> I haven't found much in the way of a comparative analysis between the
> models, what have I missed? Testimonials/advice about how folks came to
> choose their particular model are very much welcome.

I have a "honey" Swift. It's comfortable, but probably not worth the
exorbitant cost compared to something like a Flite. A warning -
neatsfoot oil turns honey saddles rather dark brown!

Roy Zipris

My B-17 was comfortable right out of the box. My new Swift is, after
about 450 miles, is not quite there yet. Try Wallingford,
www.wallbike.com, who offers a 6-month guarantee on Brooks saddles.
And you'll be supporting a small entrepreneur who is helpful and a
pleasure to deal with. -Roy Zipris

Rick Warner

"Mark H." <hwtspam@stop.att.net> wrote in message news:<6kkjc.49532$um3.974701@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
> The answer must be so simple that I'm looking past it. Countless hours,
> days, spent perusing Google for the past 10 year's newsgroup posts about
> Brooks saddles, plus the various dealers sites, reveal much about Brooks
> saddles, but...how to choose?
>
> There're those that hate Brooks and those that love. Of the lovers, some
> found them comfortable right out of the box, others only after a couple
> thousand miles...some wave a can of Proofide at them every year or two, some
> soak them in brine for 12 hours before each ride...some need a wide
> platform, some narrow...some models are recommended for the more
> "aggressive" rider, then not...and so on, but...
>
> Me, I'm 6', 175 pounds and engage in club rides (training/recreational)
> every week, about 18 mph pace. I'm "average" build; my "sit bones" not
> wide, accommodating any of the Brooks models, I believe.
>
> Should I try the Swift? Looks like a good start. What about the B-17, Team
> Pro? And why? I had a Brooks, rusty memory cells may recall, some decades
> ago with my vintage 10-speed; at least I'm leather saddle friendly.
>
> I haven't found much in the way of a comparative analysis between the
> models, what have I missed? Testimonials/advice about how folks came to
> choose their particular model are very much welcome.
>
> Sorry for potential repetitiveness of subject matter.
>
> Thanks in advance.

In part it depends on the relationship between handlebar height and
seat height. You think your sit bones are not particularly wide, but
they are wider when seated more upright than when leaning more
forward. The B-17 is wider than the Swift, Team Pro, etc., and for a
number of people I know (me included) is the best choice as handlebar
height approaches, and goes above, seat height. If you have your bars
a couple of inches below seat height, then the narrow saddles are
better for most. Using a narrow saddle with the bars near or above
seat height will help you learn the meaning of the term 'arse
hatchet'.

- rick

DRS

"Jack Fortune" <jfortune@uoregon.edu> wrote in message

[...]

> Contact the folks at Wallingford Bicycle Parts:
>
> http://www.wallbike.com/

Their server is down.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

dg

Yes I did TP. Thanks for noticing.

"Steve Shapiro" <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote in message
news:tUujc.16038$qE6.15735@fe06.usenetserver.com...
> Originally posted by Dg I have the B17 Titanium. Almost immediately
> comfortable. It's black and lighter than the standard. I think it looks
> fine on a road bike. Have a traditional honey B17 on my mtb. Very happy
> with both. BTW, only used proofhide as recommended by Brooks.
>
> "Mark H." <hwtspam@stop.att.net> wrote in message
news:6kkjc.49532$um3.974701@bgtnsc04-
> news:6kkjc.49532$um3.974701@bgtnsc04- news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > The answer must be so simple that I'm looking past it. Countless
> > hours, days, spent perusing Google for the past 10 year's newsgroup
> > posts about Brooks saddles, plus the various dealers sites, reveal
> > much about Brooks saddles, but...how to choose?
>
> snip Dg top posted: BTW, only used proofhide as recommended by Brooks.
>
> Why? I've got 2 B17 Champion Specials. These are B17s with thicker
> leather on a steel frame. I like them both. When new, I dunked them in
> neets foot oil for 20 to 30 minutes before using them. It's what I did
> to my baseball gloves as a kid and it worked then. Also, Sheldon Brown
> recommends it. Now, I can recommend it for saddles too.
>
> Of my B17s, one was comfortable from the start. The second was not,
> taking about 200 miles to "break in." The leather on the second had a
> stiffer feel (read hard as a rock) then the first. Neither saddle has
> sagged or required any tension adjustment, but only the first has any
> miles on it (around 2K.)
>
> Steve Shapiro
>
>
>
> --
>
>