Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Equipment > rec.bicycles.tech
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Drive side crank arm goes farther onto taper than other arm

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 21-04.-2004, 02:40 PM   #1
Robert Canon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Drive side crank arm goes farther onto taper than other arm

I have a drive side crank arm that goes farther onto either crank axle taper
than the non-drive side. Is it wallowed out and consequently ruined? I'm
assuming that the taper is the same for both arms and both ends of the axle;
is that correct? (I realize that some have asymmetrical overhangs.)


  Reply With Quote
Old 22-04.-2004, 12:32 AM   #2
Werehatrack
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Drive side crank arm goes farther onto taper than other arm

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:40:48 GMT, "Robert Canon"
<rcanon@mail.utexas.edu> may have said:

>I have a drive side crank arm that goes farther onto either crank axle taper
>than the non-drive side. Is it wallowed out and consequently ruined? I'm
>assuming that the taper is the same for both arms and both ends of the axle;
>is that correct? (I realize that some have asymmetrical overhangs.)


If the chainline is right, the sprockets don't hit the stays, and the
crank isn't coming loose on the BB shaft when properly tightened, then
don't worry about the visual assymetry. Right and left cranks are not
identical to begin with.

--
My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23-04.-2004, 08:05 PM   #3
McLeody
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Drive side crank arm goes farther onto taper than other arm

Werehatrack <rault00@earthWEEDSlink.net> wrote in message news:<h45d8058r0hpcunsaljch6b41hguim48ll@4ax.com>...
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:40:48 GMT, "Robert Canon"
> <rcanon@mail.utexas.edu> may have said:
>
> >I have a drive side crank arm that goes farther onto either crank axle taper
> >than the non-drive side. Is it wallowed out and consequently ruined? I'm
> >assuming that the taper is the same for both arms and both ends of the axle;
> >is that correct? (I realize that some have asymmetrical overhangs.)

>
> If the chainline is right, the sprockets don't hit the stays, and the
> crank isn't coming loose on the BB shaft when properly tightened, then
> don't worry about the visual assymetry. Right and left cranks are not
> identical to begin with.


Unless the crank arm is going onto the shaft so far that the bolt wont
hold it tight I wouln't worry too much. You can do a temporary fix if
this is the case by wrapping some aluminium foil around the square of
the crank and then fitting the arm over this. This will pack the crank
arm further out on the shaft and will fill the 'wallowed' out part of
the crank arm. Must emphasise that this is a temporary fix only but if
every thing is kept tight it will last for quite some time.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24-04.-2004, 05:03 AM   #4
jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Drive side crank arm goes farther onto taper than other arm

Robert Canon writes:

> I have a right crank that goes farther onto either end of the
> spindle than the left crank. Is it wallowed out and consequently
> ruined? I'm assuming that the taper is the same for both sides; is
> that correct? (I realize that some have asymmetrical overhangs.)


Unless the crank has cracks in the corners of the square, the crank
bore is not stretched. For depth of engagement, the best assessment
can be made by tightening the crank properly, removing the crank bolt
and measuring the depth to the end of the spindle. Viewing it from
outside doesn't give a clear picture.

Do you know the history of these cranks? Are they from the same set
and who used them in the past? If the crank remains secure in use,
then I think you have your answer. You might find something
applicable in the FAQ:

http://draco.acs.uci.edu/rbfaq/FAQ/8f.11.html

Jobst Brandt
jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org
  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:10 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com