Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Equipment > rec.bicycles.tech
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Why are some derailers non-SIS?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 18-04.-2004, 09:58 AM   #1
Ken Pisichko
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why are some derailers non-SIS?

In reading Sheldon's glossary and in looking at bikes with friction and
SIS types of shift systems I would like to know why deraillers are
described as non-SIS. I don't really see why a derailler cannot be used
for indexing or friction shifting on the identical rear "gear sprocket".
What am I missing?

  Reply With Quote
Old 18-04.-2004, 10:27 AM   #2
Phil Brown
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why are some derailers non-SIS?

>In reading Sheldon's glossary and in looking at bikes with friction and
>SIS types of shift systems I would like to know why deraillers are
>described as non-SIS. I don't really see why a derailler cannot be used
>for indexing or friction shifting on the identical rear "gear sprocket".
>What am I missing?


A derailleur must move a specific distance per one click of cable movement to
be compatable and the cable pull per click must be compatable as well.
Phil Brown
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-04.-2004, 11:24 AM   #3
Dan Daniel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why are some derailers non-SIS?

On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 19:58:32 -0500, Ken Pisichko <kenp@mts.net> wrote:

>In reading Sheldon's glossary and in looking at bikes with friction and
>SIS types of shift systems I would like to know why deraillers are
>described as non-SIS. I don't really see why a derailler cannot be used
>for indexing or friction shifting on the identical rear "gear sprocket".
>What am I missing?


As someone said, movement per unit of cable pull.

'SIS' is a specific term- Shimano Index System,' I believe. Other
companies have other names.

Seems to me that the surest sign that a rear derailleur is *not* meant
to be used on an indexed system is the lack of an adjustable barrel
for the cable. This is helpful for fine tuning the indexing.

Then again, it'd be interesting to add an adjustable barrel to a
non-indexed derailleur and see if it can be used with indexing.

Well, not that interesting actually.....
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-04.-2004, 03:11 PM   #4
Werehatrack
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why are some derailers non-SIS?

On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 19:58:32 -0500, Ken Pisichko <kenp@mts.net> may
have said:

>In reading Sheldon's glossary and in looking at bikes with friction and
>SIS types of shift systems I would like to know why deraillers are
>described as non-SIS. I don't really see why a derailler cannot be used
>for indexing or friction shifting on the identical rear "gear sprocket".
>What am I missing?


The ratio of cable travel to derailleur motion must be an exact match
in order for the indexing to work. This is assured in the
SIS-compatible ders and shifters. It is *not* assured in others, and
mix-and-match is pretty much guaranteed not to work for those.

--
My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-04.-2004, 02:57 AM   #5
Alex Rodriguez
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why are some derailers non-SIS?

In article <4081D2B8.FA14F194@mts.net>, kenp@mts.net says...

>In reading Sheldon's glossary and in looking at bikes with friction and
>SIS types of shift systems I would like to know why deraillers are
>described as non-SIS. I don't really see why a derailler cannot be used
>for indexing or friction shifting on the identical rear "gear sprocket".
>What am I missing?


The shifting mechanism will only work properly when you use compatible
components. This means the shifter, derailler and cassette have to be
matched. So when you click the shifter one click the derailleru moves
exactly the spacing of the cassette. If the derailleur is not SIS, it
means that for one click of an SIS shifter, it moves more or less than
the spacing of the cassette.
--------------
Alex


  Reply With Quote
Old 20-04.-2004, 03:12 AM   #6
David Kerber
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why are some derailers non-SIS?

In article <4081D2B8.FA14F194@mts.net>, kenp@mts.net says...
> In reading Sheldon's glossary and in looking at bikes with friction and
> SIS types of shift systems I would like to know why deraillers are
> described as non-SIS. I don't really see why a derailler cannot be used
> for indexing or friction shifting on the identical rear "gear sprocket".
> What am I missing?


If you're using indexed shifters, the other responders have already
described the issue. What they didn't mention is that if you're using
friction shifters, it doesn't matter what derailleur you use.

--
Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the
newsgroups if possible).
  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:48 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com