Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
03-04.-2004, 04:06 PM
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: "Road" bikes
Chris Zacho The Wheelman wrote:
> Since when has the term "road bike" come to be reserved _exclusively_ > for racing machines? My tourer is a road bike, I would never take it on > a trail. > > Most recumbents are also made for road use, why aren't they called road > bikes? > > The sport bike isn't an ATB either, it's also made exclusively for the > road. Shouldn't the term include them too? > > Same goes for "comfort" bikes and commuter (or "city") bikes. Why do > they get left out? > > Why can't they just call a racing bike a racing bike? Isn't it bad > enough that they selfishly get all the top of the line quality > componentry and equipment while the rest of us get treated like second > class citizens by the industry? Do they have to dominate the > nomenclature as well? I believe it's because most aren't ever used for racing, plus the term "racing bike" has unfortunate 70s connotations, as Sheldon alludes to. I still call mine a racing bike though, being I'm a child of the 70s (I used to ride a Raleigh Chopper. but that's another story...) |
|
Linear Mode
