![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
With budgetry approval provided, I've been having a look at shoes
locally and online. Dean Woods have a great deal on for Lake CX110 Tri shoes for $99 (next best price I've seen is $170) which seem pretty right for me. I don't know what size shoe I am in bike shoe sizes (about a 9 in real shoe language) so was thinking of going into the next bike shop I see and trying some on. Problem is most have Shimano shoes but I can't find anyone else with this model of Lake shoe, so I'm wondering if there is much difference between brands. The other thing is it is listed as SPD/Look/SPD-R compatible, and given that I need pedals as well was wondering if there is an obvious choice between the various choices (hopefully I don't invoke too much discussion on this), or do they all have differing pros and cons (in which case I might as well go for the cheapest). DaveB |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
DaveB wrote:
> With budgetry approval provided, I've been having a look at shoes > locally and online. Dean Woods have a great deal on for Lake CX110 Tri > shoes for $99 (next best price I've seen is $170) which seem pretty > right for me. I don't know what size shoe I am in bike shoe sizes (about > a 9 in real shoe language) so was thinking of going into the next bike > shop I see and trying some on. Problem is most have Shimano shoes but I > can't find anyone else with this model of Lake shoe, so I'm wondering if > there is much difference between brands. > > The other thing is it is listed as SPD/Look/SPD-R compatible, and given > that I need pedals as well was wondering if there is an obvious choice > between the various choices (hopefully I don't invoke too much > discussion on this), or do they all have differing pros and cons (in > which case I might as well go for the cheapest). > > DaveB > Dave Yes there are significant differences between brands. My advice is to never buy shoes mail order unless you *know* they fit you. I usually take a size 10 ordinary shoe, and a 44 or 45 cycling shoe, depending on the brand. As far as pedals go, you'll be wanting Look pedals for Tri shoes I expect. To summarise the pros and cons: SPD - metal cleats, longer wearing, can walk easily Look - plastic cleats, don't last long, can't walk easily, have more contact with the pedal so are more comfortable. SPD-R - I've never looked up close but I believe they are Shimano's attempt at an SPD-like road pedal. AFAIK, they have been replaced by another design, which is not compatible with SPD-R. Anyone else know anything about SPD-Rs? Basically, if you want to be able to ride and walk easily, get SPD. If you're riding a road bike and don't have to walk a lot, get Look. Oh BTW, although Look is a brand name, heaps of companies make 'Look-style' compatible shoes and cleats. And...when you buy pedals, you normally get a pair of cleats included. Cheers. -- Nick |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Shoes as the previous poster stated are difficult to buy online & lots of
companies source from different factories for cheaper product every year so you can't even say a brand is always the same. If its cheap as with Lake because they quit old stock every year you can take the chance but ebay is full of shoes where people have taken the chance. Probably more cost effective shopping around for a shoe/pedal deal & any shop will then set the cleats up for you so you can ride away. Strip the thread on your new shoes fitting some cleats & even IF they replace them under warranty you will still be out of action for a while. SPD-R are like SPD (common on mtb) on steroids , bigger surface area & metal cleat makes for good support & wear BUT lots of shoe companoes didn't support the format as it required extensive reworking of the sole so have been superceded by SPD-SL which goes back to 3 hole resin cleats which a cynic would assume is mainly due to the cleats being more consumable & they can make more dollars along the track as the SPD-R hardly wear over a season. "NickZX6R" <zx6r@thegarbage.angrydwarf.net> wrote in message news:40f5055e$1@duster.adelaide.on.net... > DaveB wrote: > > With budgetry approval provided, I've been having a look at shoes > > locally and online. Dean Woods have a great deal on for Lake CX110 Tri > > shoes for $99 (next best price I've seen is $170) which seem pretty > > right for me. I don't know what size shoe I am in bike shoe sizes (about > > a 9 in real shoe language) so was thinking of going into the next bike > > shop I see and trying some on. Problem is most have Shimano shoes but I > > can't find anyone else with this model of Lake shoe, so I'm wondering if > > there is much difference between brands. > > > > The other thing is it is listed as SPD/Look/SPD-R compatible, and given > > that I need pedals as well was wondering if there is an obvious choice > > between the various choices (hopefully I don't invoke too much > > discussion on this), or do they all have differing pros and cons (in > > which case I might as well go for the cheapest). > > > > DaveB > > > > Dave > > Yes there are significant differences between brands. My advice is to > never buy shoes mail order unless you *know* they fit you. > I usually take a size 10 ordinary shoe, and a 44 or 45 cycling shoe, > depending on the brand. > > As far as pedals go, you'll be wanting Look pedals for Tri shoes I expect. > > To summarise the pros and cons: > SPD - metal cleats, longer wearing, can walk easily > Look - plastic cleats, don't last long, can't walk easily, have more > contact with the pedal so are more comfortable. > SPD-R - I've never looked up close but I believe they are Shimano's > attempt at an SPD-like road pedal. AFAIK, they have been replaced by > another design, which is not compatible with SPD-R. Anyone else know > anything about SPD-Rs? > > Basically, if you want to be able to ride and walk easily, get SPD. If > you're riding a road bike and don't have to walk a lot, get Look. > > Oh BTW, although Look is a brand name, heaps of companies make > 'Look-style' compatible shoes and cleats. > > And...when you buy pedals, you normally get a pair of cleats included. > > Cheers. > -- > Nick |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Steve wrote:
> Shoes as the previous poster stated are difficult to buy online & > lots of companies source from different factories for cheaper product > every year so you can't even say a brand is always the same. Thanks for the advice guys. I went in to Cecil Walker on the way home tonight (if I'd goen straight home I might have beaten the rain though). Tried on some Shimano and Nike MTB shoes (decided if the budget only stretched to one pari they better be MTB) which had a huge difference in size even though both were 44. And was further grateful that I didn't order online when they fitted the cleats to the shoes which took a fair bit of effort. I rode home with them with my old pedals and toe clips and found by the half-hour mark the arches of both feet were really sore. Is that normal? Hopefully I just need some time to get used to them. DaveB |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
DaveB wrote:
> Steve wrote: > > Shoes as the previous poster stated are difficult to buy online & > > lots of companies source from different factories for cheaper product > > every year so you can't even say a brand is always the same. > > Thanks for the advice guys. I went in to Cecil Walker on the way home > tonight (if I'd goen straight home I might have beaten the rain though). > Tried on some Shimano and Nike MTB shoes (decided if the budget only > stretched to one pari they better be MTB) which had a huge difference in > size even though both were 44. And was further grateful that I didn't > order online when they fitted the cleats to the shoes which took a fair > bit of effort. > > I rode home with them with my old pedals and toe clips and found by the > half-hour mark the arches of both feet were really sore. Is that normal? > Hopefully I just need some time to get used to them. > > DaveB > First, I expect riding with clips _and_ SPDs is probably not going to help. I spose like other sport shoes, they need to be snug but not tight. Make sure you haven't overtightened them. You'd think with a very stiff sole that bike shoes probably wouldn't need wearing in like normal shoes. But I've found that new bike shoes have always felt a bit strange and it takes a short while to get comfy in them. You should also check the cleat position. It should be centered under the ball of your foot (or so I've been told). I wouldn't think being really sore within half an hour is normal, but if I were you I'd ride a couple more times to see if it persists. -- Nick |
|
|