![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Date: 15 Jun 2004 05:38:45
From: chris Subject: Re: Decanio on doping at racelistings.com This is nothing new, though. There are a few teams out there who seem to turn their riders into a--holes, including a few junior programs. A few years ago I was cooling down after a race with a friend when we noticed a prominent NE team ride by an average joe cyclist with (obvious) mechanical problems like he didn't exist. We turned around. I'm not saying we're special, just that we're not winning friends in the public by being dicks. Regarding Decanio, I found it an interesting read, but not too surprising. I've heard a few Saturn stories and U.S. doping in general. Its so easy to get away with here and its easy to get good drugs. My views on doping have changed over the years, but I will say that doping to win some regional race in the U.S. like Athens Twilight, Bear Mountain or the Green Mnt Stage race is laim; who are you impressing? God, I've heard of cat 3's and 4's doping! At least get your D-1 pro contract first and then make that decision. However, if anyone out there believes Hein's claim that 95% of the Euro Pro's are clean they're smoking crack. Overall, I think most of us can pick out the dopers in the U.S. and clean guys; some guys win big races, others dominate from March to September. At least in the U.S. you can certainly compete clean and win, just not so often (e.g. Mark McCormack). When I was in Ireland a few weeks ago I caught a great 2 hr program on doping in sport, with an emphasis on cycling and running. They had interviews with Robin Seymour (top Irish cycling MTB), Paul Kimmage, Dick Pound and UCI notables. It was amazing, the Pound is pointing fingers saying cycling has a problem, but that doping isn't widespread, the UCI says 5-10%, and clean riders are saying 95%. Some researchers are now saying that some genetic manipulation may already exist. I think what Decanio claims is just the tip. As I said, its easy to do here and easy to get, so its very tempting. Whether you agree or not, doping at the top may be a "necessary evil", but juniors and U-23's need to realize they need to get to the top on their own merits, not chemicals. Who want's to dope up to finish last in P-R? Maybe too many. CH BTW: I am in no way implying or pointing fingers at any U.S. rider in particular, just generalizing from what I know (seen/verified) and have heard (rumor or heresay from those I trust). > It rang true to me. I am surprised too that he said as > much about Saturn as he > did. I do not have the best of things to say about the > Saturn Junior team from > experience with them. They had some good kids, but a bunch > of them were at least as nasty as anything said about > Gags, or Sundt. If JT is bringing this up, and it doesn't > surprise Richard then your going to > have to prove otherwise to me. Bill C |
|
|