![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I remember reading tha Cunego would not be participating in
this year's Tour day France, but alas I can not recall as to why this decision was made. Would somebody please refresh my memory?? Dave |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Pistof wrote:
> I remember reading tha Cunego would not be participating > in this year's Tour day France, but alas I can not recall > as to why this decision was made. Would somebody please > refresh my memory?? > > Dave Too young and not ready to be exploited yet. -- Perre You have to be smarter than a robot to reply. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Pistof" <dataylor123@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:40eefdc6$1$90822$39cecf19@news.twtelecom.net... > I remember reading tha Cunego would not be participating > in this year's Tour > day France, but alas I can not recall as to why this > decision was made. Would somebody please refresh my > memory?? Claimed he needed to recover and prepare for the Vuelta IIRC. Real reason... Simoni would have to kill him after being shown up again. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Per Elmsäter" <perDOTelmsater@telia.com> wrote in message
news:ceDHc.4672$dx3.37344@newsb.telia.net... > Pistof wrote: > > I remember reading tha Cunego would not be participating > > in this year's Tour day France, but alas I can not > > recall as to why this decision was made. Would somebody > > please refresh my memory?? > > > > Dave > > Too young and not ready to be exploited yet. > Wouldn't that be the perfect time to exploit him? How many riders in the TdF are being exploited? |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Per Elmsäter" <perDOTelmsater@telia.com> wrote in message
news:ceDHc.4672$dx3.37344@newsb.telia.net... > Pistof wrote: > > I remember reading tha Cunego would not be participating > > in this year's Tour day France, but alas I can not > > recall as to why this decision was made. Would somebody > > please refresh my memory?? > > > > Dave > > Too young and not ready to be exploited yet. I'm sure you're kidding, but my newsreader filtered-out your emoticon. :-) Dave |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Carl Sundquist wrote:
> "Per Elmsäter" <perDOTelmsater@telia.com> wrote in message > news:ceDHc.4672$dx3.37344@newsb.telia.net... >> Pistof wrote: >>> I remember reading tha Cunego would not be participating >>> in this year's Tour day France, but alas I can not >>> recall as to why this decision was made. Would somebody >>> please refresh my memory?? >>> >>> Dave >> >> Too young and not ready to be exploited yet. >> > > Wouldn't that be the perfect time to exploit him? > > How many riders in the TdF are being exploited? Maybe my english is somewhat lacking here. During the Giro this was discussed a lot on the Eurosport coverage by the swedish commentators. What they where saying was that if he was thrown into too many hard stage races too soon he would risk cracking before he had *matured* enough to be "exploited" properly. From what I understood this is how they had interpreted what the Saeco team management had hinted at. Maybe USPS just plain bought him out so Lance could work on his sixth without being embarrased? -- Perre You have to be smarter than a robot to reply. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Bestest Handsander wrote:
> "Pistof" <dataylor123@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:40eefdc6$1$90822$39cecf19@news.twtelecom.net... > >>I remember reading tha Cunego would not be participating >>in this year's > > Tour > >>day France, but alas I can not recall as to why this >>decision was made. Would somebody please refresh my >>memory?? > > > Claimed he needed to recover and prepare for the Vuelta > IIRC. Real reason... Simoni would have to kill him after > being shown up again. > > You think about it. With all the crashes, who's more expendable to Saeco right now. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Per Elmsäter" <perDOTelmsater@telia.com> wrote in message
news:5gFHc.4679$dx3.37410@newsb.telia.net... > Carl Sundquist wrote: > > "Per Elmsäter" <perDOTelmsater@telia.com> wrote in > > message news:ceDHc.4672$dx3.37344@newsb.telia.net... > >> Pistof wrote: > >>> I remember reading tha Cunego would not be > >>> participating in this year's Tour day France, but alas > >>> I can not recall as to why this decision was made. > >>> Would somebody please refresh my memory?? > >>> > >>> Dave > >> > >> Too young and not ready to be exploited yet. > >> > > > > Wouldn't that be the perfect time to exploit him? > > > > How many riders in the TdF are being exploited? > > Maybe my english is somewhat lacking here. During the Giro > this was discussed a lot on the Eurosport coverage by the > swedish commentators. What > they where saying was that if he was thrown into too many > hard stage races too soon he would risk cracking before he > had *matured* enough to be "exploited" properly. From what > I understood this is how they had interpreted what the > Saeco team management had hinted at. > The primary usage of the word 'exploit' is to take advantage of someone or something, to the detriment of the person or thing being exploited. Another definition of exploit is use or do something fully and completely. You understand the definition of exploit, but your sentence phrasing indicated the primary usage, rather then the other one. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 14:37:45 -0600, "Bestest Handsander" <none@u.biz>
wrote: >Claimed he needed to recover and prepare for the Vuelta >IIRC. Real reason... Simoni would have to kill him after >being shown up again. In Baltomoreze, Simoni shoved a grenade down his throat and exploited him... Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels... |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Curtis L. Russell wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 14:37:45 -0600, "Bestest Handsander" > <none@u.biz> wrote: > >> Claimed he needed to recover and prepare for the Vuelta >> IIRC. Real reason... Simoni would have to kill him after >> being shown up again. > > In Baltomoreze, Simoni shoved a grenade down his throat > and exploited him... > This must be a third definition of exploit. Sound awfully similar to what gays do though ![]() -- Perre You have to be smarter than a robot to reply. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Carl Sundquist wrote:
> "Per Elmsäter" <perDOTelmsater@telia.com> wrote in message > news:5gFHc.4679$dx3.37410@newsb.telia.net... >> Carl Sundquist wrote: >>> "Per Elmsäter" <perDOTelmsater@telia.com> wrote in >>> message news:ceDHc.4672$dx3.37344@newsb.telia.net... >>>> Pistof wrote: >>>>> I remember reading tha Cunego would not be >>>>> participating in this year's Tour day France, but alas >>>>> I can not recall as to why this decision was made. >>>>> Would somebody please refresh my memory?? >>>>> >>>>> Dave >>>> >>>> Too young and not ready to be exploited yet. >>>> >>> >>> Wouldn't that be the perfect time to exploit him? >>> >>> How many riders in the TdF are being exploited? >> >> Maybe my english is somewhat lacking here. During the >> Giro this was discussed a lot on the Eurosport coverage >> by the swedish commentators. What they where saying was >> that if he was thrown into too many hard stage races too >> soon he would risk cracking before he had *matured* >> enough to be "exploited" properly. From what I understood >> this is how they had interpreted what the Saeco team >> management had hinted at. >> > > The primary usage of the word 'exploit' is to take > advantage of someone or something, to the detriment of the > person or thing being exploited. Another definition of > exploit is use or do something fully and completely. You > understand the definition of exploit, but your sentence > phrasing indicated the primary usage, rather then the > other one. Oh. I thought it was only Communists that used what you call the primary definition and that a true Capitalist would *only* acknowledge the second definition ![]() -- Perre You have to be smarter than a robot to reply. |
|
|