Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Road Racing > rec.bicycles.racing > rec.bicycles.racing archive
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


why Backstedt was able to win Paris-Roubaix

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-07.-2004, 04:46 PM   #1
Kurgan Gringion
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default why Backstedt was able to win Paris-Roubaix

http://www.cyclingnews.com/tour04.p...JD_tdf04_stg5_7

Dumbasses -

Any rider who cares this much will get his/her day
eventually.

much anyways.

K. Gringioni doesn't care anymore
 
Old 09-07.-2004, 09:01 PM   #2
Dan Connelly
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why Backstedt was able to win Paris-Roubaix

Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/tour04.p...otos/2004/tour-
> 04/stage5/JD_tdf04_stg5_7
>

Paying the price for too much work in the TTT?

> much anyways.
> K. Gringioni doesn't care anymore
>

,,, and eats too much, anyways?

Dan
 
Old 09-07.-2004, 11:16 PM   #3
Greg Hall
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why Backstedt was able to win Paris-Roubaix

Master Baiter Kurgan,

Roger Hammond was too much the gentleman and didn't short
the course by dropping down on the apron in the P-R sprint.
Either that or he didn't think of it first. That's why
Magnus won. Get it?

Greg "Every dog has it's day" Hall

"Kurgan Gringioni" <kgringioni@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<cclhvm$d3@odak26.prod.google.com>...
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/tour04.p...otos/2004/tour-
> 04/stage5/JD_tdf04_stg5_7
>
>
>
>
>
> Dumbasses -
>
>
> Any rider who cares this much will get his/her day
> eventually.
>
>

> much anyways.
>
>
>
>
> K. Gringioni doesn't care anymore
 
Old 10-07.-2004, 01:31 AM   #4
K. J. Papai
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why Backstedt was able to win Paris-Roubaix

"Kurgan Gringioni" <kgringioni@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<cclhvm$d3@odak26.prod.google.com>...
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/tour04.p...otos/2004/tour-
> 04/stage5/JD_tdf04_stg5_7
>
>
>
>
>
> Dumbasses -
>
>
> Any rider who cares this much will get his/her day
> eventually.
>
>
> Unless you're one of those f***g Fat Master who cares, but
> eats to much anyways.

Why so scatalogical and negative Hank?

Big Guyz rul3.
>
>
>
> K. Gringioni doesn't care anymore
 
Old 10-07.-2004, 02:10 AM   #5
Carl Sundquist
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why Backstedt was able to win Paris-Roubaix

"K. J. Papai" <ken@kenpapai.com> wrote in message
> >
> > Dumbasses -
> >
> > Any rider who cares this much will get his/her day
> > eventually.
> >
> > Unless you're one of those f***g Fat Master who cares,
> > but eats to much anyways.
>
> Why so scatalogical and negative Hank?
>

Ken,

What does 'scatological' mean to you?
 
Old 10-07.-2004, 03:19 AM   #6
Tom Schulenburg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why Backstedt was able to win Paris-Roubaix

"Carl Sundquist" <carlsun@cox-internet.com> wrote in message
news:10etit0ubmuj90@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "K. J. Papai" <ken@kenpapai.com> wrote in message
> > >
> > > Dumbasses -
> > >
> > > Any rider who cares this much will get his/her day
> > > eventually.
> > >
> > > Unless you're one of those f***g Fat Master who cares,
> > > but eats to much anyways.
> >
> > Why so scatalogical and negative Hank?
> >
>
> Ken,
>
> What does 'scatological' mean to you?

Looks like Backstedt is trying to take a dump.

-T
 
Old 10-07.-2004, 05:48 AM   #7
Benjamin Weiner
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why Backstedt was able to win Paris-Roubaix

Greg Hall <vc_slim@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > Any rider who cares this much will get his/her day
> > eventually.

> > much anyways.

> Master Baiter Kurgan,

> Roger Hammond was too much the gentleman and didn't short
> the course by dropping down on the apron in the P-R
> sprint. Either that or he didn't think of it first. That's
> why Magnus won. Get it?

> Greg "Every dog has it's day" Hall

And after P-R, Hammond looked a lot like Backstedt did
yesterday:

http://grahamwatson.com/gw/imagedoc...hotos/04parrou-
022000

I dig the pictures of riders throwing their bikes and
themselves down on the infield grass after P-R. No TV
interviewers, no microphones, no soigneurs (yet), just pain
mixed with relief.
 
Old 10-07.-2004, 07:15 AM   #8
K. J. Papai
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why Backstedt was able to win Paris-Roubaix

"Carl Sundquist" <carlsun@cox-internet.com> wrote in message news:<10etit0ubmuj90@corp.supernews.com>...
> "K. J. Papai" <ken@kenpapai.com> wrote in message
> > >
> > > Dumbasses -
> > >
> > > Any rider who cares this much will get his/her day
> > > eventually.
> > >
> > > Unless you're one of those f***g Fat Master who cares,
> > > but eats to much anyways.
> >
> > Why so scatalogical and negative Hank?
> >
>
> Ken,
>
> What does 'scatological' mean to you?

Literally "crude potty talk!" !! Or an adjective of
people who use swear words out of extreme sarcasm (and
possibly hatred of Masters Racers).

I'll stick to the crude, angry "potty talk" definition
though since it's more ''Philistinian.''

I once lambasted Roger Ebert about using the word
"scatalogical" on one of his reviews 10 years ago. Pretty
freakin' weird.

-Ken
 
Old 10-07.-2004, 08:16 AM   #9
Richard Adams
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why Backstedt was able to win Paris-Roubaix

Dan Connelly <d_j_c_o_n_n_e_l@i_e_e_e.o_r_g> wrote in message news:<tDvHc.13030$dR3.11700@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com>...
> Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
> > http://www.cyclingnews.com/tour04.p...photos/2004/to-
> > ur04/stage5/JD_tdf04_stg5_7
> >
>
> Paying the price for too much work in the TTT?
>

Paying the price for being a big guy on a windy stage.
 
Old 10-07.-2004, 10:30 AM   #10
Boyd Speerschne
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why Backstedt was able to win Paris-Roubaix

ackthpt@concentric.net (Richard Adams) wrote in
news:c2352af0.0407091508.62556209@posting.google.com:

> Paying the price for being a big guy on a windy stage.

???

Richard, the little guys suffer much more than the big guys
during a windy stage.

Why do you think its always the little Spanish climbers
getting dropped when the escelons start to form in strong
cross winds?
 
Old 10-07.-2004, 05:01 PM   #11
Kyle Legate
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why Backstedt was able to win Paris-Roubaix

"K. J. Papai" <ken@kenpapai.com> wrote in message
news:6100cab2.0407090829.c2e212c@posting.google.com...
> "Kurgan Gringioni" <kgringioni@hotmail.com> wrote in
> message
news:<cclhvm$d3@odak26.prod.google.com>...
> >
http://www.cyclingnews.com/tour04.p...os/2004/tour04-
/stage5/JD_tdf04_stg5_7
> >
> >
> > Dumbasses -
> >
> >
> > Any rider who cares this much will get his/her day
> > eventually.
> >
> >
> > Unless you're one of those f***g Fat Master who cares,
> > but eats to much anyways.
>
> Why so scatalogical and negative Hank?
>
Shit, I think you need to look up the definition of
scatalogical, and post a sentence using the word correctly.
 
Old 10-07.-2004, 05:15 PM   #12
Howard Kveck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why Backstedt was able to win Paris-Roubaix

In article <2l9keiF9hepkU1@uni-berlin.de>,
"Kyle Legate" <legatek@hotmail.com> wrote:

> "K. J. Papai" <ken@kenpapai.com> wrote in message
> news:6100cab2.0407090829.c2e212c@posting.google.com...
> > "Kurgan Gringioni" <kgringioni@hotmail.com> wrote in
> > message
> news:<cclhvm$d3@odak26.prod.google.com>...
> > >
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/tour04.p...otos/2004/tour-
> 04/stage5/JD_tdf04_st g5_7
> > >
> > >
> > > Dumbasses -
> > >
> > >
> > > Any rider who cares this much will get his/her day
> > > eventually.
> > >
> > >
> > > Unless you're one of those f***g Fat Master who cares,
> > > but eats to much anyways.
> >
> > Why so scatalogical and negative Hank?
> >
> Shit, I think you need to look up the definition of
> scatalogical, and post a sentence using the word
> correctly.

I hate to do this, but first the word must be spelled
correctly: just as we've done the pelOton thing...

--
tanx, Howard

So far, so good, so what?

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
 
Old 10-07.-2004, 06:00 PM   #13
Stewart Fleming
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why Backstedt was able to win Paris-Roubaix

Kyle Legate wrote:

> Shit, I think you need to look up the definition of
> scatalogical, and post a sentence using the word
> correctly.

There you go.
 
Old 10-07.-2004, 08:01 PM   #14
Per ElmsäTer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why Backstedt was able to win Paris-Roubaix

Boyd Speerschneider wrote:
> ackthpt@concentric.net (Richard Adams) wrote in
> news:c2352af0.0407091508.62556209@posting.google.com:
>
>> Paying the price for being a big guy on a windy stage.
>
> ???
>
> Richard, the little guys suffer much more than the big
> guys during a windy stage.
>
> Why do you think its always the little Spanish climbers
> getting dropped when the escelons start to form in strong
> cross winds?

Could you elaborate on this?

--
Perre

You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.
 
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:47 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet