Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
09-07.-2004, 01:15 AM
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Lance 9:45 down
No biggie.
|
|
|
|
09-07.-2004, 02:45 AM
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Lance 9:45 down
In article <QpeHc.30967$Xq4.10334@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>,
phil_da_thrill@hotmail.com says... >No biggie. Had it been Ulrich or Hamilton, it would be a biggie. ----------- Alex |
|
|
|
09-07.-2004, 04:00 AM
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Lance 9:45 down
Alex Rodriguez wrote:
> In article <QpeHc.30967$Xq4.10334@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, > phil_da_thrill@hotmail.com says... > >>No biggie. > > > Had it been Ulrich or Hamilton, it would be a biggie. They're down a bit farther but that's no biggie either. If you mean that it would be a "biggie" if Armstrong were down by 9:45 TO Ullrich or Hamilton, well, yeah. -- -------------------- Remove CLOTHES to reply |
|
|
Linear Mode
