![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2
|
I'm building up a light xc mountain bike with an ultegra 12-27T cassette. I'm deciding between a long cage xtr derailleur (which I have around) or an ultegra triple rear derailleur.
Any advice on the pros and cons of each? My concern with the long cage xtr is shifting speed. My concern with the ultegra is durability. i ride fast cross country trails, mostly dry, and don't do any big drops or anything. Thanks, Zach |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 2,778
|
Quote:
The total wrap amount on the Ultegra will be less, but unless you have a very large range of chain ring change, it should work and be durable enough. However, I would probably stay with the XTR as I don't think you will note any difference in shifting speed... unless it is worn and/or needs an overhaul. I think durability is a toss up between the two. I have used both, but I am staying with XTR Derailers on everything from tandems (road and MTB) to touring bicycles. They work well and shift very well. I would suggest Shimano chain if you want the best in shifting. Your milage may vary.
__________________
David Ornee, Western Springs, IL USA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 12
|
I would use a connex chain, rather than a shimano. the shimano are renound for breaking. just make sure you get the correct width.
__________________
Stay upright, unless otherwise required. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: East Coast Canada!
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
The only reason a chain will break is due to misinstallation. Never reuse a pin after you have pushed it out - always use a new connecting pin (for Shimano), and never push out the same pin. NOW you will stop breaking chains AND get good shifting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 2
|
Road derailleurs work just fine. I have always had one on my mtb. They won't take above a 28 or 30T cog. 32 and 34, which are common now, will not work. But why buy someting else when you've got an XTR on hand?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 294
|
Quote:
its amazing how many people use the same pin more than once, infact i ahve to say i did it once, ages ago didnt know then but i know now ive got an S-RAM chain with the detachable.. thing i cant think what its called im gonna call it a 'detachable thing-a-ma-bob' which is alot more convinient.anyway about the deraleurs, i dont think youd notice much between them, might as well go with what youve got
__________________
GT Ruckus SS 2006 Giant Trance 1 Giant TCR Euro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2
|
You already have an XTR derailleur in hand- might as well use it. It is one of the best shifting parts to date. I have used XTR derailleurs on my Joker as well as xc bike for the past 7yrs. and they are awesome. Trouble-free shifting.
I honestly think that the longer cage will reduce the amount of chainslap when you're hammering on the trails. And with a longer cage mtb derailleur, you have a much wider variety of cassette options should you choose to switch that out later. |
|
|
|