![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
|
I am considering buying a 1980 Fuji S12-2 LTD Men's Touring Bike, and I was wondering if anyone here knew anything about this bike. Like, how suitable it is for self contained touring over very long distances. I looked all over the internet for some info and couldnt find any. Here are the specs:
Frame Fuji Double Butted Chrome Molybdenum Steel Tubing, 331 Fork Cromoly 331 tubing Rims UKAI 36H brushed aluminum - Made in Japan Hubs 80 Sunshine Gyromaster Sealed Bearings with QR Sunshine levers Tires/tubes New Kenda GW 90 psi tires 27" x 1¼" & new presta tubes Pedals MKS QU-2K racing alloy w/Mira toe clips and YFC leather straps Crank Fuji forged alloy J12 - 36-44-53T - 170mm arms-Made in Japan Chain HKK OG Made in Japan Freewheel Suntour Perfect - gold in color: 14-17-19-22-26-30T Front Derailleur Suntour NSL Fuji - swing direction is opposite normal Rear Derailleur Fuji Vx direct mount alloy Shifters Suntour friction bar end Handlebars Nitto Fuji Olympiade 115 alloy Stem Nitto Technomic alloy Headset Tange Seiki Brakeset DiaCompe 1160 w/QR levers Brakelevers Weinmann Saddle Fuji Seamless Seat Post Sugino SP-H 26.6 mm Color Black and Silver Size 58 cm center to juncture (23") 22½" c-c Weight 28 lbs
__________________
mike elkins |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 2,777
|
Quote:
Pretty old bicycle and tough to get information on. I have a similar vintange Sekai that I used for one short loaded tour. 1. Replacement parts are getting harder to find for this vintage. 2. Chain rings are too large for loaded touring 3. Frame isn't good in stiffness and makes stability quite a challenge. 4. The brakes aren't strong enough or easy to get good control. 5. Shifting under load is tough 6. I road the same tour with the same load on a Bruce Gordon BLT a week later. I was absolutely amazed how much easier it was to ride and how much more I enjoyed everthing that much more.
__________________
David Ornee, Western Springs, IL USA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 115
|
I wouldn't buy it to tour on... too old. In fact, it's worth about 20 bucks. Feel free to buy it cheap and smash around town on it, but don't tour on it.
Good luck |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 73
|
I'll be the contrarian and say that it sounds like a decent bike, depending on the price.
If you go for it (or went for it, what with me posting a month late), be sure to put some good brake pads on there like the Kool Stop Salmons or the like. I'd change the handlebar (I have nightmares about breaking bars), overhaul the hubs and BB, replace the cables and housings, and go have some fun. Before a tour, be sure to check/overhaul your deraillers, shifters, and all that like you normally would. And if you bought it and no longer want it, drop me a line. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2
|
I bought one (black) in 1982 from the Corvallis, Oregon bicycle shop. Had the shop put on Randonneur bars.
Great bike! At that time half-step gearing was popular for touring so I changed the chain rings to 36-44-48. The 36T is as small as you could go on the stock crank. Changed the back to a 34T granny gear. I put about 6,000 miles on it but changed to a Sugino triple crank with a 24T inner chain ring after hurting a knee going over a steep pass with full touring gear. A corporate move bent the frame and wheels, and broke the rear derailleur so insurance paid off for a replacement. I would have preferred to have kept an undamaged bike. If I find another S12S LTD in a garage sale I'll grab it. North"wet" |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NYC, USA
Posts: 564
|
Let me ask you if you had a choice what do you folks think would be a great bike for touring. I have a Cannondale F600 and some guys in my shop think it could be fine but others say I need steel and different brakes. Another guy tells me I need a McGuyver type bike and wondering which bike falls into that catgeory at less than $1,000...If you had a 1,000 what would you buy?
Also how did you get hurt, planning my first run and wanting to be prepared for the worst. -John Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Spokane Wa USA
Posts: 54
|
Quote:
I would fork out an extra $200 and get a Trek 520. http://www2.trekbikes.com/Bikes/Spe...g/520/index.php |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NYC, USA
Posts: 564
|
Thanks for the info. Guys in my bike shop were recommending a last year Bianchi that they feel would be as good at a discount. I checked Bianchi Site and they really do not look like they do much touring bikes.
Who makes the best? I see alot of people choosing Trek bikes, who else is good? -John Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Spokane Wa USA
Posts: 54
|
Quote:
Bianchi has a bike called the “Volpe”. It would probably be a good touring bike but it's a downgrade on the components from the Trek 520. The “Fuji Touring” looks ok but like the Bianchi it’s a downgrade on components. Co-Motion has some REAL COOL touring bikes but they start around $3000. The Cannondale T2000 is comparable quality and components but it’s $1500 (neat bike though). I don’t think you’ll find a “touring” bike in the 520’s price range that comes close on component quality. The frame is great also. If there are comparable price/quality bikes to the 520 I would like to learn about them. John, keep us posted on what you decide on :-) Last edited by Fendercrazy : 25-02.-2005 at 08:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NYC, USA
Posts: 564
|
I checked out the CO-MOTION website and they do have some very beautiful bikes. I would imagine it is the difference between the 1,500 and 3,000 bikes much be pretty big in terms of performance. Do you feel that is true?
Also I been checking sites and honestly it seems like cyclo-cross bikes are very similar to touring bikes. Do you think that is true? What is the difference? More important, thanks for all the advice. -John Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Spokane Wa USA
Posts: 54
|
Quote:
I think the touring bikes still have a longer wheel base and are set up better for racks and carying loads. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NYC, USA
Posts: 564
|
After some more thought and debate I think for Boston I will stick it out with my Cannon F600 and change my tires to a wider set. Someone recommended a great tire for touring. I was riding today when the snow was starting here in NY, do you know of any good tires for the snow/ice.
BTW, great call, I went to my local shop and it was a Volpe. It is strange my two local bike stores here in NYC seem to not like Trek. They do not carry any of them but both admit they are huge. For the Bianchi they were asking almost a 1,000 but said it was last year model and I could get a better price. -john |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NYC, USA
Posts: 564
|
I was looking at the latest issue of Bicycling and was amazed how few touring bikes they look at. I could only find the Volpe and one other bike. I guess just not sexy enough.
-john Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Spokane Wa USA
Posts: 54
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|