![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Recovery is the Golden Fleece and almost nobody gets it right
Posts: 484
|
Are there "real" disadvantages in performance seen with 650c wheels?
"They say" acceleration is better but ride is a little harsher. What about performance seen "at speed" at any given power output etc. Thanx Last edited by TiMan : 24-03.-2004 at 05:21 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 334
|
I don't have any answers but I've asked the same questions myself.
The smaller wheel should be lighter and faster. Brian |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,667
|
Apparently it is a toss up between:
Pros: Lighter, more aerodynamic. Cons: Higher rolling resistance, you look like you are on a kiddie bike. I don't think they give a big advantage or disadvantage overall as the pros & cons even eachother out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 334
|
Tyres and tubes would be harder to find.
Wouldn't smaller wheels look right on a small frame? Why would a smaller wheel have a higher rolling resistance? Brian |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,667
|
Because to travel the same distance, the wheel has to turn more times, this leads to higher resistance in the hubs (I think). That is the theory.
Some suggest that 650's are okay if the rider's height is up to 173-178cm (5 foot 8 inches- 5' 10") only and that 700's are good for those 168 cm (5' 6") and above. The overlap is for overall bike fit and rider flexibility. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 334
|
I can understand that in a cheaper hub but on the smooth hubs it wouldn't be a problem. The increased speed of the rim could be a slight aero and weight disadvantage offset by the shorter/lighter weight.
Brian |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,667
|
That sounds like a better explanantion than the hub one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bathurst, NSW, Australia
Posts: 327
|
Although it is neglible with todays 11 tooth sprockets and cheaper aftermarket chainrings, but you may find that your gearing needs to be changed to keep up with the guys on bigger wheels. Not really a disadvantage as such, but a bit annoying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Perth (Basso), West Australia
Posts: 3,512
|
Several of my friends use 650 wheels. The bikes are custom made and offer less wind resistance. Highest gears seem to be 53/11. Some pix: http://www.trysport.com.au/frameset_athleteBikes.htm
Some wheels for sale: http://www.triwa.org.au/discus//mes...html?1080873875 I hope this helps, cheers George
__________________
Cheers, George. |
|
|
|