Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Grand Tours - Giro - Tour de France - Vuelta a España
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


2004 TdF Route Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-02.-2004, 04:33 AM   #16
Shnerpals
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New York/Connecticut
Posts: 37
Send a message via AIM to Shnerpals
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by davek
The Aple d'Huez time trial will be amazing, but the following day they have to face the mother of all alpine stages - 212km over five biiiig climbs - Glandon, Madeleine, Tamie, Forclaz, Croix de Fry.

The team TT sucks completely, new rules or not (and the new rules won't make any real difference to the likes of Ullrich and Hamilton anyway). The TdF is not a team event in the same way that, say, football is a team sport - it's a lot more like F1, where the team is serving the needs of the team leader. The GC doesn't go to the best team, it goes to the best individual, but the team time trial is like giving that individual a head start.


I love the TTT a and it is definately needed! the TdF is very much a team sport and the only reason why Lance or anybody succeeds as an individual is because of the team...If Ullrich had a bad team that didnt ride specifically for him he would be lost and never be able to get 2nd or 1st...sure the team isnt the one who wins the event but thats why they have individual TTs...i also think the new rules could make a huge difference! if any of the top contenders have a team that isnt as skilled as the others they could lose significant time to them! or say Ullrich crashes and slows his team down so that they lose 3-4 minutes to lance...laance wont gain anything from that even though he should...thats the one thing about the tour that is unlike any other sport is that illness and injury do not change time...you dont get cut any slack when anything could happen and i think that the new TTT will make that day and maybe the race less exciting than usual...
__________________
-Jill
"I'll be back next year, and I'm not coming back to be second, but hopefully to come back to the level I was in the first four Tours." -Lance Armstrong 6/26/03
Shnerpals is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02.-2004, 12:45 PM   #17
hemplands
Registered User
 
hemplands's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: East Kent, UK
Posts: 164
Default

[If Ullrich had a bad team that didnt ride specifically for him he would be lost and never be able to get 2nd or 1st

In 1997 when Ullrich won the tour there wasn't a team time trial. Neither was there one in 95, 96, 98, 99, and who won those years, Indurain, Riis, Pantani & Armstrong.
hemplands is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02.-2004, 12:51 PM   #18
Shnerpals
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New York/Connecticut
Posts: 37
Send a message via AIM to Shnerpals
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by hemplands
[If Ullrich had a bad team that didnt ride specifically for him he would be lost and never be able to get 2nd or 1st

In 1997 when Ullrich won the tour there wasn't a team time trial. Neither was there one in 95, 96, 98, 99, and who won those years, Indurain, Riis, Pantani & Armstrong.


I didnt mean that w/o a TTT Ullrich wouldnt get 1st or 2nd i meant that if he did not have a strong team that supported him he wouldnt...I think the TTT is important because it shows just how strong those teams are and gives them a time to shine and show the real reason why these people are winning...and that with the new rule restricting the amount of time a competitor can gain it will change the overall strategy of the team and make the whole idea of a TTT less exciting than when competitors could gain major time.
__________________
-Jill
"I'll be back next year, and I'm not coming back to be second, but hopefully to come back to the level I was in the first four Tours." -Lance Armstrong 6/26/03
Shnerpals is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02.-2004, 09:12 PM   #19
davek
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 264
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Shnerpals
I think the TTT is important because it shows just how strong those teams are and gives them a time to shine and show the real reason why these people are winning...


Consider cycling as a team sport in the same way that cricket or baseball are team sports. In each you have whole team units but within that unit you have individuals who specialise in the different disciplines of the sport - bowlers/pitchers, batsmen, fielders, and so on. Likewise, you have different roles within a cycling team - leader, sprinter, domestique, etc. You don't pick a cycling team based on how good they all are at time trialling. Getting the whole team to perform a time trial together is like asking every member of a baseball team to have a go at pitching and then base the overall score on the performance of the worst pitcher.

Where I'm sure we'll agree is that the new rules are an ugly fudge. The Tour organisers need to get off the fence - either they think the TTT is a good thing, in which case there should be no time restrictions, or they think it's a bad thing, in which case they should drop it from the race.

Everyone knows that the strength of his team is part of the reason why Lance has been able to win the last five TdFs and you don't need a team time trial to prove it. On the other hand, I believe that without the team time trial last year then Ullrich might very well have won - so maybe last year's win really should be given to the team?
davek is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02.-2004, 03:29 AM   #20
Shnerpals
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New York/Connecticut
Posts: 37
Send a message via AIM to Shnerpals
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by davek
Consider cycling as a team sport in the same way that cricket or baseball are team sports. In each you have whole team units but within that unit you have individuals who specialise in the different disciplines of the sport - bowlers/pitchers, batsmen, fielders, and so on. Likewise, you have different roles within a cycling team - leader, sprinter, domestique, etc. You don't pick a cycling team based on how good they all are at time trialling. Getting the whole team to perform a time trial together is like asking every member of a baseball team to have a go at pitching and then base the overall score on the performance of the worst pitcher.
Everyone knows that the strength of his team is part of the reason why Lance has been able to win the last five TdFs and you don't need a team time trial to prove it. On the other hand, I believe that without the team time trial last year then Ullrich might very well have won - so maybe last year's win really should be given to the team?


It would be different if the TTT was all uphill or all sprinting but it isnt...the course is designed so anyone could ride it. So it is testing how well the team works together to ride faster than the other teams...you pick a cycling team based on the ability of the riders...if a rider is good at climbing but horrible at riding flats why would they pick that person to be on their team...you pick a rider based on their ability to be all around good as well as having a particular strength...I do agree with you that if there was not a TTT last year Ullrich may have won the race depending on if Lance changed his strategy because of it...
__________________
-Jill
"I'll be back next year, and I'm not coming back to be second, but hopefully to come back to the level I was in the first four Tours." -Lance Armstrong 6/26/03
Shnerpals is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02.-2004, 03:42 AM   #21
davek
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 264
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Shnerpals
you pick a rider based on their ability to be all around good as well as having a particular strength...


This is patently untrue or the likes of Petacchi and Cippolini would never get a ride on a TdF team.
davek is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02.-2004, 04:05 AM   #22
Shnerpals
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New York/Connecticut
Posts: 37
Send a message via AIM to Shnerpals
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by davek
This is patently untrue or the likes of Petacchi and Cippolini would never get a ride on a TdF team.


They may be on a team but not necessarily the best teams...If you look at the people that were/are on lances team they were all well rounded and could work whenever they were needed no matter what...that is why most people pick teams for the overall ability of the rider to ride through everything...Petacchi and Cippolini may only have ability in one area but they win specific races and stages and thats why they are on TdF teams because half the teams just want to win stages and finish the race...
__________________
-Jill
"I'll be back next year, and I'm not coming back to be second, but hopefully to come back to the level I was in the first four Tours." -Lance Armstrong 6/26/03
Shnerpals is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:35 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet