![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 10
|
I've been reading alot about the different muscle fibers and how they affect climbing and sprinting. Now, slow twitch fibers are much more lean and less in actual size than fast twitch which are much bulkier. The slow twitch fibers are leaner and in turn lead to a lighter person who will be better at climbing. I also read that people with fast twitch muscle fibers are more of a spinner than a grinder. The question is: Can Sprinters or people with more fast twitch muscle fibers time trial well? In a time trial weight is not a big variable once you get up to speed and if the spinters spin more and generate more power that way what is stopping them from being good time trialists?
__________________
"No one in this race isn't less tired than you are" |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 43
|
This seems like an interesting question and I hope that someone can explain it. In my opinion, time-trialing seems to be more of a mental thing - preparation, concentration, attention to technique. Generally speaking, those that do well in time trials, in the grand tours, are usually the same ones who are shooting for high place in the gc. Consequently, sprinters usually aren't interested in gc, so they go for the daily glory - stage wins, cash prizes, sprinters jerseys, etc. However, I have a suspicion that if Super Mario had wanted to be a time trial specialist, he could have done exceptionally well - he has the strength, the speed, and god only knows the kind of wattage he can produce. In the end I think it comes down to personal choice rather than ability - sprinters don't usually care about doing well in time trials,..... those that wish to be on the podium do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 68
|
What about Brad Mcgee's time trial win in prologue of tour d france. Can he sprint? probably not as fast as the green jersey guys...but he must be close in order to do those big leadouts he did for Baden Cooke.
I agree that the big sprinters could TT well if that was their goal. Less likely that a TT specialist could beat a sprinter. TOP END speed!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 10
|
Brad McGee was the world pursuit champion on the track so that basically says that he is a real time trialist. I was wondering because i see that some sprinters usually do get some good results in time trials, i think i saw that robbie mcewen got 17th in a TdF TT, so he obviously has it there to time trial. I wonder why they just choose not to go for the win.
__________________
"No one in this race isn't less tired than you are" |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 62
|
Quote:
At a professional elite level there is a difference in TT and sprinters .ie Road riders. If it were at a club level these so called sprinters would still timetrial the pants off any club racer. Most road sprinters were considered Time trialers on the track. Baden Cooke did his time in the aussie pursuit team. A good time trialer will generally have a higher VO2max, less fast twitch muscle, less weight, and better frontal surface area to aerobic power ratio than a sprinter. It also has a lot to do with training as well. A good time trialer that trains to grind the pedals for efficiency eg Jan Ullrich would find it difficult to sustain the legspeed for sprinting. Jonny |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London, England
Posts: 120
|
Quote:
But wasn't he known as a sprinter in his youth? Miguel Poblet (rival to Van Steenbergen) once won a Vuelta TT. Didn't Rudi Altig win TdF TTs?
__________________
Roy Gardiner, Hainault Roads Club |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Community Team
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Lierde Flanders
Posts: 296
|
This will largely depend on what you call a sprinter, how close to world class.
And what you mean by time trial short 3-7k prologue or the real thing over around 40k?
__________________
A winner is a loser who didn't quit! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,265
|
Quote:
Physiologicaly, RR sprinters aren't realy sprinters they are endurance athletes that can sprint. To appreciate this, compare supermario (or any other pro sprinter) to track sprinters (e.g. matched sprint opr kilo) and you will appreciate that they are vastly different creatures. Actualy the populations of muscle fibres that you have does not do much to determine your ability to ride endurance or sprint. Someone with a low percentage of fast twitch fibers can have the same cross sectional area of fast twitch muscle fibers as someone with a high percentage of fast twitch fibers. The cross sectional area of the muscle fibre populations being important in force production. Sprinters 'TEND' to have more fast and endurance riders TEND to have more slow twitch muscles. The limiting factors in time trial performance are 1. VO2 max and 2. lactate threhold (ignoring 3. economy and 4. oxygen uptake kinetics as they are hard to change). Maximising the VO2 max and LT allows a rider to sustain a high power output for a long time (these riders tend not to be able to sprint). While sprinters train their anaerobic capacities so are able to produce VERY high power outputs for very short periods; they have 'lower' VO2 max and LT values so cannot sustain a high power output for very long. Climbers tend to be like time trialers, but due to low body masses have high power to weight values, but low absolute power values. In very short TT's (e.g. a prologue) VO2 max is important and as the duration of the race increases LT becomes more important. While TT's will be riden between VO2 max and LT power output depending upon race length; both the power output at VO2 max and LT are closely correlated to performance in TT's. Strength is defined as the amount of force that can be produced during a single muscle contraction and is not considered important factor in endurance performance. This is demonstrated by TTer's less than muscular legs (cross section of muscle important to strength and force production potential). You suggest that the ability to 'spin more and generate more power' would help sprinters be good at TT's, but you neglect the fact that except for races in which sprint tactics are important (i.e. bunch sprint) VO2 max and LT (or rather the power at these) are the most important variables. Ability to spin is a product of skill/neuromuscular skill and to produce high powers (like a sprinter) a product of strength and anaerobic capacity. All in all... RR sprinters are not 'real' sprinters, rather endurance riders that can sprint. While TT riders are endurance riders that can ride reletivly hard for long periods (i.e. they poses true endurance). Last edited by 2LAP : 16-10.-2003 at 10:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 10
|
Ok I see what you mean. But if a sprinter were to bring their VO2 max up and Lactate Threshold to maybe want to time trial a little better, would this bring down their anaerobic capacities and in the end hurt their sprint? I know that there have been a couple of sprinters who turned into good all arounders, like Laurent Jalabert. But even after Jalabert went to an all rounder by bringing up his VO2 Max and Lactate Threshold would he still be able to produce a sprint strong enough to rival the Road Race sprinters?
__________________
"No one in this race isn't less tired than you are" |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 45
|
I think the maturity of the cyclist can have abit to do with it
Look at Johann MUSEEUW.....he was a very good field sprinter in his early years....and now does the hard man grind to win races like Paris- Roubaix.....obviously his strength endurance has increased over his pro career and he has worked this strength to his advantage......his sprint has diminished as he has got older and worked more on his massive ability to turn a big gear through the mud for 200 plus kilometres..... He is one rider who impresses the hell out of me!!!!
__________________
Shaneo Cannondale caad7 (2003) Cannondale caad5 (2000) Cannondale caad3 (1998) Kojima Condor (1996) |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,265
|
Quote:
Yes a sprinter would be able to bring up their LT and VO2 max, and yes this would probably 'damage' their ability to sprint due to the different types of training needed, changes in body composition and specific changes in the muscles, etc. that are required. Similarly a Time Trial specialist could train to sprint better, but this may slow their TT slightly. Riders like Jalabert, when they come back seem to loose 'a lot' of their sprint ability and become good allrounders (neither the best at hills, TTs or sprints) making them very successful. One reason why sprinters may retain the abilty to sprint well is that they understand the tactics, positioning, etc. despite a loss in anaerobic capacity, neuromuscular 'skill', strength, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,265
|
Quote:
Not sure what 'strength endurance' is, but yes its likely that his VO2 max and LT has improved (hence higher sustained power outputs for long periods of time). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 45
|
Quote:
sorry....that should have been strength/endurance.....or in other words he has a very high HL ratio (scientific term: hard legs) p.s. sorry, I prefer the road jargon....
__________________
Shaneo Cannondale caad7 (2003) Cannondale caad5 (2000) Cannondale caad3 (1998) Kojima Condor (1996) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 17
|
the one thing I would question is the way these road sprinters "found" the ability to become better endurance animals
is this change in ability trained or maunfactured? |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 10
|
Anyone can be trained into being able to sustain an aerobic pace for a long time. This is what makes the track sprinters so much different from the Road Race sprinters. Track sprinters generally are much more bulkier than even the road race sprinters who are pretty bulky already. Like people have said before if they were testing a track sprinter and a road race sprinter they would probably say that the road race sprinter is more of an endurance athlete compared to the track sprinter. This is not to say that track sprinters dont have aerobic capacity for endurance though.
__________________
"No one in this race isn't less tired than you are" |
|
|
|