Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
28-06.-2008, 02:43 AM
|
#46 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: notorious Texas playboy
On Jun 26, 2:03*pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
> On Jun 26, 10:23*am, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 26, 9:42*am, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 25, 10:55*pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > > > > In article > > > > <rcousine-5094DD.17522625062008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]>, > > > > *Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > In article > > > > > <6e75ce1a-c705-4a9c-8679-67f417714...@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > *"Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 24, 10:07*pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > In article > > > > > > > <928b702c-311d-474e-adf5-3a921ba39...@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups..com>, > > > > > > > *SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Jun 24, 1:44*pm, "b...@mambo.ucolick.org" <b...@mambo.ucolick.org> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > [I]f you are > > > > > > > > > familiar with the NYT from the front of the book (news > > > > > > > > > coverage), you may not realize that in fact it does leaven > > > > > > > > > the serious paper-of-record stuff with articles explicitly > > > > > > > > > devoted to Stupid Shit. > > > > > > > > > Yeah, like peppering the pages with stuff from this guy forexample: > > > > > > > >http://www.econjournalwatch.org/pdf...terIssuesJanuar... > > > > > > > > > "Investigating him is a way of investigating the larger cultural > > > > > > > > phenomenon." > > > > > > > > > Indeed -- the NYT sometimes informs us by the left hand. > > > > > > > > One of these days SoS is going to discover Mencious Moldbug, and his > > > > > > > rhetoric here is just going to get way, way crazier. > > > > > > > Way crazier than attempting to make a point by posting a link to a 25 > > > > > > page eye-glazing .pdf? > > > > > > -Paul > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > <http://unqualified-reservations.blo...cracy-as-histor > > > > > ical-phenomenon.html> > > > > > > <http://unqualified-reservations.blo...-letter-to-open > > > > > -minded-progressives.html> > > > > > > It would have been easier to find had I spelled it properly. > > > > > > I don't actually think Mencius Moldbug is _right_, per se, but I think > > > > > he is wrong in maddeningly fascinating ways. > > > > > > In my dark moments, I suspect he's a moderate conservative's Naomi Klein > > > > > or Noam Chomsky: you think you disagree with him, but his ideas are > > > > > devilishly attractive. > > > > > He mentions violence and has little to say about it. > > > > I propose the formal view of violence: an individual > > > > condones, incites, offers, and does violence because > > > > he feels like it. > > >http://www.2blowhards.com/archives/...al_version.html > > > > So if someone was beating you and attempting to take your wallet, and > > > you defended yourself by fighting back, it would be because "you felt > > > like it"? > > > > I propose the formal view of not just violence, but a formal > > > philosophy of life: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto > > > you." *From this flows "enlightened self-interest". > > > Big notDumbThisTime Paul, > > > I've brought up this bedrock moral value -- also known as the golden > > rule -- before in this forum, although I personally prefer the > > negative phrasing of it. > > No one cares or understands how it arose or > > works as an interpersonal (social) rule of conduct. *That's because > > rbr, like everywhere else, is loaded up with impaired capacity we-meme > > borgites. *Or maybe they are just plain dumb, or were trained in > > publik skools, or who knows???... (Me.) *I hope I have adequately > > insulted folks, although it never seems to be enough. > > > Everyone's friend, > > SoTS > > Interesting. I have you pegged you as someone with tunnel vision > focused on "Me Me Me!". *People who think nothing of bulldozing a rare > cactus typically treat people the same way. What looked like a blooper about cactus to you and Bill turned out to be a linedrive sizzling over your heads. Should you ever wish to take measure of the shot, it landed at the property marker flag. |
|
|
28-06.-2008, 04:52 AM
|
#47 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: notorious Texas playboy
On Jun 27, 10:43*am, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> On Jun 26, 2:03*pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 26, 10:23*am, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 26, 9:42*am, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 25, 10:55*pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > > > > > In article > > > > > <rcousine-5094DD.17522625062008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]>, > > > > > *Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > In article > > > > > > <6e75ce1a-c705-4a9c-8679-67f417714...@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > *"Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jun 24, 10:07*pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > In article > > > > > > > > <928b702c-311d-474e-adf5-3a921ba39...@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > *SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 24, 1:44*pm, "b...@mambo.ucolick.org" <b...@mambo.ucolick.org> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > [I]f you are > > > > > > > > > > familiar with the NYT from the front of the book (news > > > > > > > > > > coverage), you may not realize that in fact it does leaven > > > > > > > > > > the serious paper-of-record stuff with articles explicitly > > > > > > > > > > devoted to Stupid Shit. > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, like peppering the pages with stuff from this guy for example: > > > > > > > > >http://www.econjournalwatch.org/pdf...terIssuesJanuar... > > > > > > > > > > "Investigating him is a way of investigating the larger cultural > > > > > > > > > phenomenon." > > > > > > > > > > Indeed -- the NYT sometimes informs us by the left hand. > > > > > > > > > One of these days SoS is going to discover Mencious Moldbug, and his > > > > > > > > rhetoric here is just going to get way, way crazier. > > > > > > > > Way crazier than attempting to make a point by posting a linkto a 25 > > > > > > > page eye-glazing .pdf? > > > > > > > -Paul > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > <http://unqualified-reservations.blo...cracy-as-histor > > > > > > ical-phenomenon.html> > > > > > > > <http://unqualified-reservations.blo...-letter-to-open > > > > > > -minded-progressives.html> > > > > > > > It would have been easier to find had I spelled it properly. > > > > > > > I don't actually think Mencius Moldbug is _right_, per se, but I think > > > > > > he is wrong in maddeningly fascinating ways. > > > > > > > In my dark moments, I suspect he's a moderate conservative's Naomi Klein > > > > > > or Noam Chomsky: you think you disagree with him, but his ideasare > > > > > > devilishly attractive. > > > > > > He mentions violence and has little to say about it. > > > > > I propose the formal view of violence: an individual > > > > > condones, incites, offers, and does violence because > > > > > he feels like it. > > > >http://www.2blowhards.com/archives/...al_version.html > > > > > So if someone was beating you and attempting to take your wallet, and > > > > you defended yourself by fighting back, it would be because "you felt > > > > like it"? > > > > > I propose the formal view of not just violence, but a formal > > > > philosophy of life: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto > > > > you." *From this flows "enlightened self-interest". > > > > Big notDumbThisTime Paul, > > > > I've brought up this bedrock moral value -- also known as the golden > > > rule -- before in this forum, although I personally prefer the > > > negative phrasing of it. > > > No one cares or understands how it arose or > > > works as an interpersonal (social) rule of conduct. *That's because > > > rbr, like everywhere else, is loaded up with impaired capacity we-meme > > > borgites. *Or maybe they are just plain dumb, or were trained in > > > publik skools, or who knows???... (Me.) *I hope I have adequately > > > insulted folks, although it never seems to be enough. > > > > Everyone's friend, > > > SoTS > > > Interesting. I have you pegged you as someone with tunnel vision > > focused on "Me Me Me!". *People who think nothing of bulldozing a rare > > cactus typically treat people the same way. > > What looked like a blooper about cactus to you and Bill turned out to > be a linedrive sizzling over your heads. *Should you ever wish to take > measure of the shot, it landed at the property marker flag. Whatever, you right wing bastard with your 50 mpg clown car. ;-) -Paul |
|
|
|
28-06.-2008, 07:39 AM
|
#48 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: notorious Texas playboy
On Jun 27, 12:52 pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
> On Jun 27, 10:43 am, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 26, 2:03 pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > > > > ...I have you pegged you as someone with tunnel vision > > > focused on "Me Me Me!". People who think nothing of bulldozing a rare > > > cactus typically treat people the same way. > > > What looked like a blooper about cactus to you and Bill turned out to > > be a linedrive sizzling over your heads. Should you ever wish to take > > measure of the shot, it landed at the property marker flag. > > Whatever, you right wing bastard with your 50 mpg clown car. ;-) It is a tragedy that the ball has rolled into the commons. I do luv my clown car. |
|
|
|
28-06.-2008, 08:04 AM
|
#49 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: notorious Texas playboy
On Jun 26, 10:52*am, Fred Fredburger
<FredFredbur...@Where.Are.The.Nachos> wrote: > SLAVE of THE STATE wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 26, 9:42 am, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 25, 10:55 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > >>> In article > >>> <rcousine-5094DD.17522625062008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]>, > >>> *Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> In article > >>>> <6e75ce1a-c705-4a9c-8679-67f417714...@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, > >>>> *"Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > >>>>> On Jun 24, 10:07 pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> In article > >>>>>> <928b702c-311d-474e-adf5-3a921ba39...@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, > >>>>>> *SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> On Jun 24, 1:44 pm, "b...@mambo.ucolick.org" <b...@mambo.ucolick.org> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> [I]f you are > >>>>>>>> familiar with the NYT from the front of the book (news > >>>>>>>> coverage), you may not realize that in fact it does leaven > >>>>>>>> the serious paper-of-record stuff with articles explicitly > >>>>>>>> devoted to Stupid Shit. > >>>>>>> Yeah, like peppering the pages with stuff from this guy for example: > >>>>>>>http://www.econjournalwatch.org/pdf...terIssuesJanuar... > >>>>>>> "Investigating him is a way of investigating the larger cultural > >>>>>>> phenomenon." > >>>>>>> Indeed -- the NYT sometimes informs us by the left hand. > >>>>>> One of these days SoS is going to discover Mencious Moldbug, and his > >>>>>> rhetoric here is just going to get way, way crazier. > >>>>> Way crazier than attempting to make a point by posting a link to a 25 > >>>>> page eye-glazing .pdf? > >>>>> -Paul > >>>> Yes. > >>>> <http://unqualified-reservations.blo...cracy-as-histor > >>>> ical-phenomenon.html> > >>>> <http://unqualified-reservations.blo...-letter-to-open > >>>> -minded-progressives.html> > >>>> It would have been easier to find had I spelled it properly. > >>>> I don't actually think Mencius Moldbug is _right_, per se, but I think > >>>> he is wrong in maddeningly fascinating ways. > >>>> In my dark moments, I suspect he's a moderate conservative's Naomi Klein > >>>> or Noam Chomsky: you think you disagree with him, but his ideas are > >>>> devilishly attractive. > >>> He mentions violence and has little to say about it. > >>> I propose the formal view of violence: an individual > >>> condones, incites, offers, and does violence because > >>> he feels like it. > > >http://www.2blowhards.com/archives/...al_version.html > > >> So if someone was beating you and attempting to take your wallet, and > >> you defended yourself by fighting back, it would be because "you felt > >> like it"? > > >> I propose the formal view of not just violence, but a formal > >> philosophy of life: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto > >> you." *From this flows "enlightened self-interest". > > > Big notDumbThisTime Paul, > > > I've brought up this bedrock moral value -- also known as the golden > > rule -- before in this forum, although I personally prefer the > > negative phrasing of it. *No one cares or understands how it arose or > > works as an interpersonal (social) rule of conduct. *That's because > > rbr, like everywhere else, is loaded up with impaired capacity we-meme > > borgites. *Or maybe they are just plain dumb, or were trained in > > publik skools, or who knows???... (Me.) *I hope I have adequately > > insulted folks, although it never seems to be enough. > > > Everyone's friend, > > SoTS > > Face it, Slave: You are one of we. http://blog.mises.org/archives/008233.asp > An explanation requested: How does being a we-meme borgite prevent > someone from understanding "Do unto others ..." or, conversely, how does > NOT being a WMB aid understanding? > > I've got my own ideas, but they're tied up with religion and I suspect > that yours are not. I suspect your suspicions are correct. |
|
|
Linear Mode
