![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 20, 12:23*am, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com>
wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:26:21 -0700 (PDT), raam...@gmail.com wrote: > >On Jun 19, 8:23*am, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com> > >wrote: > >> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:09:31 -0700 (PDT), RicodJour > > >> <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote: > >> >Partly. *There seemed to be a dark patch in the road - maybe oil? - > >> >and that can happen to anybody. *It's tough when natural instinct > >> >(putting a foot down) wins out over keeping your ass from flying off > >> >an embankment. *He should have laid it down. > > >> Yeah. Perhaps rider error, perhaps oil. If I heard later his tire > >> flatted just then I wouldn't be surprised either. *But NOT severe > >> frame flex for those bikes specifically. > > >not severe flex, but just enough under load- or something else about > >the frame- last year at the tdf there were a couple of occaisions > >where the csc rider was unable to negoiate the curve on a descent, > >whereas other riders did- *anyone re-watching the tdf2007 dvds might > >just take a note of the number of times a csc rider had trouble on a > >curve > > No way. *No way is such a phenomenon especially prevalent on one type > of high end bike and not others. The Cervelo R3 is supposed to be the stiffest frame in the pro tour. As for the ability of the frame to stand stress, it is the one used by Cancellara and O'Grady in their Paris-Roubaix wins (O'Grady used a slightly modified geometry). Schleck was riding an R3-SL which is essentially the same frame. -ilan |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 19, 7:26*am, raam...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jun 19, 8:23*am, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com> > wrote: > > > Yeah. Perhaps rider error, perhaps oil. If I heard later his tire > > flatted just then I wouldn't be surprised either. *But NOT severe > > frame flex for those bikes specifically. > > not severe flex, but just enough under load- or something else about > the frame- last year at the tdf there were a couple of occaisions > where the csc rider was unable to negoiate the curve on a descent, > whereas other riders did- *anyone re-watching the tdf2007 dvds might > just take a note of the number of times a csc rider had trouble on a > curve Side load on a head tube, or just about any frame part, during a descent is essentially zero. Bicycles lean into corners rather than scrubbing tires like cars. I could see issues from either an ultra flexy fork or flex in a really long steerer and headtube (which can contribute to shimmy), but hardly any of these guys ride such a frame. If the CSC riders are falling down on curves, maybe Bjarne needs to skip the commando training camp before the season start next year, and take them skiing or MTB'ing or down some hill steeper and twistier than what they have in Denmark. Ben |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
bjw@mambo.ucolick.org wrote:
> On Jun 19, 7:26 am, raam...@gmail.com wrote: >> On Jun 19, 8:23 am, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Yeah. Perhaps rider error, perhaps oil. If I heard later his tire >>> flatted just then I wouldn't be surprised either. But NOT severe >>> frame flex for those bikes specifically. >> not severe flex, but just enough under load- or something else about >> the frame- last year at the tdf there were a couple of occaisions >> where the csc rider was unable to negoiate the curve on a descent, >> whereas other riders did- anyone re-watching the tdf2007 dvds might >> just take a note of the number of times a csc rider had trouble on a >> curve > > Side load on a head tube, or just about any frame > part, during a descent is essentially zero. Bicycles > lean into corners rather than scrubbing tires like cars. > I could see issues from either an ultra flexy fork or > flex in a really long steerer and headtube (which can > contribute to shimmy), but hardly any of these guys > ride such a frame. > > If the CSC riders are falling down on curves, maybe > Bjarne needs to skip the commando training camp > before the season start next year, and take them > skiing or MTB'ing or down some hill steeper and > twistier than what they have in Denmark. > > Ben I understand the lateral stiffness, but, I am still confused about the vertical compliance. /dave a |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article
<d0f865db-c487-4390-9743-25051925997b@d19g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, "bjw@mambo.ucolick.org" <bjw@mambo.ucolick.org> wrote: > On Jun 19, 7:26*am, raam...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Jun 19, 8:23*am, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Yeah. Perhaps rider error, perhaps oil. If I heard later his tire > > > flatted just then I wouldn't be surprised either. *But NOT severe > > > frame flex for those bikes specifically. > > > > not severe flex, but just enough under load- or something else about > > the frame- last year at the tdf there were a couple of occaisions > > where the csc rider was unable to negoiate the curve on a descent, > > whereas other riders did- *anyone re-watching the tdf2007 dvds might > > just take a note of the number of times a csc rider had trouble on a > > curve > > Side load on a head tube, or just about any frame > part, during a descent is essentially zero. Bicycles > lean into corners rather than scrubbing tires like cars. > I could see issues from either an ultra flexy fork or > flex in a really long steerer and headtube (which can > contribute to shimmy), but hardly any of these guys > ride such a frame. I do not think it is that simple. What you describe is true for a constant curvature turn. Descents require very hard changes in the bicycle's aspect. This puts forces every which way on the front of the bicycle. -- Michael Press |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 19, 6:23*pm, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com>
wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:26:21 -0700 (PDT), raam...@gmail.com wrote: > >On Jun 19, 8:23*am, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com> > >wrote: > >> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:09:31 -0700 (PDT), RicodJour > > >> <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote: > >> >Partly. *There seemed to be a dark patch in the road - maybe oil? - > >> >and that can happen to anybody. *It's tough when natural instinct > >> >(putting a foot down) wins out over keeping your ass from flying off > >> >an embankment. *He should have laid it down. > > >> Yeah. Perhaps rider error, perhaps oil. If I heard later his tire > >> flatted just then I wouldn't be surprised either. *But NOT severe > >> frame flex for those bikes specifically. > > >not severe flex, but just enough under load- or something else about > >the frame- last year at the tdf there were a couple of occaisions > >where the csc rider was unable to negoiate the curve on a descent, > >whereas other riders did- *anyone re-watching the tdf2007 dvds might > >just take a note of the number of times a csc rider had trouble on a > >curve > > No way. *No way is such a phenomenon especially prevalent on one type > of high end bike and not others.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - watch the dvds; as I own a cervelo I am more aware of the brand and was noticing those riders having problems on corners. it doesn't have to flex at the head tube- just there's a problem, could be frame alignment, whatever- there appears to be a tendancy to fail to negotiate a curve on a fast descent, not just "little bobby j" riding. keep an eye out this upcoming tdf for reoccurances |
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:11:11 -0700 (PDT), raamman@gmail.com wrote:
>watch the dvds; as I own a cervelo I am more aware of the brand and >was noticing those riders having problems on corners. it doesn't have >to flex at the head tube- just there's a problem, could be frame >alignment, whatever- there appears to be a tendancy to fail to >negotiate a curve on a fast descent, not just "little bobby j" riding. >keep an eye out this upcoming tdf for reoccurances No way is there a serious problem with that brand at that level. No way. |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 20, 2:11 am, raam...@gmail.com wrote:
> > watch the dvds; as I own a cervelo I am more aware of the brand and > was noticing those riders having problems on corners. it doesn't have > to flex at the head tube- just there's a problem, could be frame > alignment, whatever- there appears to be a tendancy to fail to > negotiate a curve on a fast descent, not just "little bobby j" riding. > keep an eye out this upcoming tdf for reoccurances Frame alignment? You don't think numerous guys who spend hours a day on a bike would have noticed? Sounds to me like you're letting your imagination run away with you. R |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 2008-06-19 01:06:20 +0200, caffetrieste <cycleto.com@gmail.com> said:
> How the HELL did Frank Schleck walk away from this one, get back on > his bike, and finish the race? > > http://www.cycleto.com/index.php?op...=article&id=289 J. Breunell is a sissy compared to F.Shleck. too bad for him: He lost victory in at least 3 monuments due to stupid crashes: Amstel+Fleche 07, Giro Lombardia 07 and now overall TDS 08. -- mvh. Morten Reippuert Knudsen "Besides, if you can't get a decent kernal panic or two in a month, what's the point of living?" |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 2008-06-19 02:56:23 +0200, "Maple Tree" <none@none.com> said:
> Wow, he is lucky he is not dead, how far did he fall and what was at the > bottom ? way down... its a tree top you ca see. Unless he was caught in the tre +10 meters. -- mvh. Morten Reippuert Knudsen "Besides, if you can't get a decent kernal panic or two in a month, what's the point of living?" |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 19, 10:26 am, raam...@gmail.com wrote:
> > not severe flex, but just enough under load- or something else about > the frame- last year at the tdf there were a couple of occaisions > where the csc rider was unable to negoiate the curve on a descent, > whereas other riders did- anyone re-watching the tdf2007 dvds might > just take a note of the number of times a csc rider had trouble on a > curve dumbass, zabriskie isn't riding a cervelo anymore but he's still crashing. there's certain guys who have a choke gene or something and will consistently find ways to sabotage themselves when they have a chance to win (julich, millar, zabriskie). frank schleck is a potential GC contender, but he shows signs of that gene. |
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
it's funny but it seems that going over the ravine doesn't seem to be as
bad as you would think...the fatalities usually seem to happen when falling right on the pavement. Unless of course you fall on rocks right on your head...but seriously, it looked like he'd at least have broken bones or something. But he gets up and finishes the stage! raamman@gmail.com wrote: > On Jun 18, 7:06 pm, caffetrieste <cycleto....@gmail.com> wrote: >> How the HELL did Frank Schleck walk away from this one, get back on >> his bike, and finish the race? >> >> http://www.cycleto.com/index.php?op...=article&id=289 > > I've seen a few csc cervelo riders do that the past year or two- I > think there's a problem with the carbon frames twisting at the head > tube under side load or something like that |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Morten Reippuert Knudsen wrote:
> On 2008-06-19 01:06:20 +0200, caffetrieste <cycleto.com@gmail.com> said: > >> How the HELL did Frank Schleck walk away from this one, get back on >> his bike, and finish the race? >> >> http://www.cycleto.com/index.php?op...=article&id=289 > > J. Breunell is a sissy compared to F.Shleck. > > too bad for him: He lost victory in at least 3 monuments due to stupid > crashes: Amstel+Fleche 07, Giro Lombardia 07 and now overall TDS 08. > Here is a video synopsis of the phenomenon - Sudden realization of potential for disaster leads to disaster Also know as "not having the right stuff" http://tinyurl.com/5thsr2 |
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It's really very simple and has nothing to do with frame flex. In
some ways it was rider error, but not how you think. It's not widely known (at least as far as I can tell from talking to folks about steering geometry) but bikes have a built-in tendency to upright themselves and go straight if you apply too much front brake while turning without simultaneously applying a little bit more downward pressure on the inside (relative to the direction of turn) handlebar. Bikes with more trail exhibit this tendency worse than bikes with less trail. Ever see someone in the process of executing a turn in a crit, then suddenly their bike pops up and they head straight out the back of the turn? Too much front brake. From watching the video I'd say that Schleck came in to the turn too hot, panicked and grabbed a bit too much front brake. Once the bike did its natural thing and straightened up, he made it worse by 1) braking more, and 2) taking his foot out of the pedal. If he'd eased up on the front brake just a tad and committed a little more force on the inside bar, he'd have been fine. Once he over- braked, everything he did made it worse. He obviously wasn't going too fast for the turn 'cause Fothen didn't have any problems. |
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <2420a6ac-151f-4da2-8f8e-343f194e6897@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
Scott <hendricks_scott@hotmail.com> wrote: > It's really very simple and has nothing to do with frame flex. In > some ways it was rider error, but not how you think. > > It's not widely known (at least as far as I can tell from talking to > folks about steering geometry) but bikes have a built-in tendency to > upright themselves and go straight if you apply too much front brake > while turning without simultaneously applying a little bit more > downward pressure on the inside (relative to the direction of turn) > handlebar. Bikes with more trail exhibit this tendency worse than > bikes with less trail. > > Ever see someone in the process of executing a turn in a crit, then > suddenly their bike pops up and they head straight out the back of the > turn? Too much front brake. > > From watching the video I'd say that Schleck came in to the turn too > hot, panicked and grabbed a bit too much front brake. Once the bike > did its natural thing and straightened up, he made it worse by 1) > braking more, and 2) taking his foot out of the pedal. > > If he'd eased up on the front brake just a tad and committed a little > more force on the inside bar, he'd have been fine. Once he over- > braked, everything he did made it worse. He obviously wasn't going > too fast for the turn 'cause Fothen didn't have any problems. I agree with all of that but I'd also add in that he might have also gotten a bit of target fixation going. Once he saw that he was headed toward the rail, he kept looking at it and that was where he kept going. It is a natural inclination to use the front brake more, as we know that it works better. Just not in cases like this. -- tanx, Howard The bloody pubs are bloody dull The bloody clubs are bloody full Of bloody girls and bloody guys With bloody murder in their eyes remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:04:05 -0700 (PDT), Scott
<hendricks_scott@hotmail.com> wrote: >It's not widely known (at least as far as I can tell from talking to >folks about steering geometry) but bikes have a built-in tendency to >upright themselves and go straight if you apply too much front brake You're joking about this being "not widely known", right? |
|