![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#46 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article
<001ba1aa-b2fd-4eb1-8169-e1201cac9541@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, RicodJour <ricodjour@worldemail.com> wrote: > On Jun 20, 9:53 am, Bob Schwartz <bob.schwa...@REMOVEsbcglobal.net> > wrote: > > > > There is an upside to team sponsorship. There is no > > downside, the worst that can happen is that the > > upside is not realized. > > If your plans do not come to fruition and you paid money to implement > those plans, that's not a downside? > > You don't happen to work in the mortgage market, do you? The > reasoning sounds similar. > > R What the shyster said. -- Ryan Cousineau rcousine@gmail.com http://www.wiredcola.com/ "My scenarios may give the impression I could be an excellent crook. Not true - I am a talented lawyer." - Sandy in rec.bicycles.racing |
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> In article > <001ba1aa-b2fd-4eb1-8169-e1201cac9541@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, > RicodJour <ricodjour@worldemail.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 20, 9:53 am, Bob Schwartz <bob.schwa...@REMOVEsbcglobal.net> >> wrote: >>> There is an upside to team sponsorship. There is no >>> downside, the worst that can happen is that the >>> upside is not realized. >> If your plans do not come to fruition and you paid money to implement >> those plans, that's not a downside? >> >> You don't happen to work in the mortgage market, do you? The >> reasoning sounds similar. >> >> R > > What the shyster said. > You too Ryan. What sponsor has taken a hit because of a doping scandal? Following the arguments that are being made here that should be trivial. Bob Schwartz |
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 20, 10:52 am, Bob Schwartz
> People seem to really want to debate hypotheticals > on this. dumbass, i'm not debating hypotheticals because i deal with sponsors and i'm telling you how the people who direct marketing think. they aren't always looking for "name recognition". coke, pepsi, louis vuitton and state farm are all well known names. any big corporate sponsor will be interested in developing a certain image or aligning themselves with certain values and are very particular about the type of exposure they get. |
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Amit Ghosh wrote:
> On Jun 20, 10:52 am, Bob Schwartz > >> People seem to really want to debate hypotheticals >> on this. > > dumbass, > > i'm not debating hypotheticals because i deal with sponsors and i'm > telling you how the people who direct marketing think. > > they aren't always looking for "name recognition". coke, pepsi, louis > vuitton and state farm are all well known names. > > any big corporate sponsor will be interested in developing a certain > image or aligning themselves with certain values and are very > particular about the type of exposure they get. Dumbass, That's why all teams are openly anti-doping. Even the ones with the worst histories of doping problems. No one has gotten burned on this. Now, some might look at that and conclude that no one gets burned. But apparently not everyone. Bob Schwartz |
|