![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#46 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 19, 10:27 am, still just me <wheeledBobNOS...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:19:12 GMT, Peter Cole <peter_c...@verizon.net> > wrote: > > >I have no idea about AT & all that -- I've never been measured. I do > >know that I was able to ride a 42 mi rolling course (pace line) in under > >2 hr on a sultry summer evening without fluids. I also know that I was > >able to finish a 300k (200 mi) hilly brevet at a modest pace (~15) hr > >without eating. Whether that "contributes anything", I don't know. > > I'm "able" to ride quite a distance too without water. However, I'm > awfully thirsty later. The general rule of thumb is that if you are > thirsty, your body is already telling you that you are dehydrated. So, > it's not particularly good for you to do it that way. You are losing > moisture when you ride, you should put some back in periodically as > you ride. > > One thing you can do is to suck down lots of water in the hours before > you ride. That way you will be fully hydrated when you start. I use > this technique when I run since carrying any water is out of the > question (for me). 1. To judge by the difference in sweat on the skin when rolling at 18-20mph compared to the profusion after coming to a stop, all in 85-90 degree weather, there's much more evaporation and evaporative cooling when cycling than when putting out that much heat in more stationary activities. I haven't read a reference to that here, or in much exercise journalism. 2. Different bodies handle hydration and dehydration differently, so different people suffer under different training regimes. By the latter, I'm thinking of such as intense 4 hour sessions still run today, old-school, with minimal drinking water, training for pain as it were. Sure, there's a risk to many of heat stroke and to a few of dying, but coaches ran summer football practices like that for dozens of years on thousands of practice fields. Most everybody may have been performing suboptimally during practices; but deaths were minimal and recovery from heat strokes near universal. Puking was common the first days, then tapered off with adaptation and attrition of the less fit. You could be sure that ALL of those athletes could benefit from some water intake. But, are you sure they ALL could tolerate and benefit from food, after being adapted to having none during practice sessions? 3. On fluid balance, some can ride the OP's distance and have empty bladders throughout. Some of them are dehydrated; others, we can read, are at risk of hyponaturia because they've misinterpreted the lack of urinary urgency and dry mouth for thirst. So, without a blood chemistry on the OP's condition, it is as it has been--anybody's guess. My experience, riding in DC heat? 24 oz of water per 10 miles, a quart after the ride, and only then is there slight urine production. But without a powermeter and blood chemistry readings, I have no idea that what I'm doing is good even if I've lost water weight. For sure, though, I'm more than 4% fat, so feeding the furnace to keep it optimally stoked is hardly a concern during workouts if the goal is mostly to become more fit before the next hard ride a couple of days later, after rest. 4. Currently, there seems to be more attention to optimal nutrition during recovery and repair, after the ride. Harry Travis |
|