![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Not only are disabled cyclists not generally recognised as such and
are banned from many areas where wheelchair users are allowed but they are also excluded from many of the benefits enjoyed by disabled motorists, such as the following. "If you have difficulty getting around, having your own car can make all the difference to your independence. Several organisations offer information and advice about buying and driving a car specially adapted for a disabled person. These include the Mobility Information Service, the Mobility Advice and Vehicle Information Service (MAVIS) and the Queen Elizabeth’s Foundation Mobility Centre. Motability is a charity that helps people to use the higher rate mobility component of their Disability Living Allowance (DLA) or their War Pensioner’s Mobility Supplement to buy powered wheelchairs, personal vehicles and cars through a hire purchase scheme. For cars, Motability covers: * a new car every three years * free tyres * insurance * road tax * servicing, maintenance and repairs * breakdown cover * window or windscreen replacement. However, your DLA or Mobility Supplement won't necessarily cover all the costs: you may also have to pay a deposit, the cost of necessary adaptations, running costs and so on. Do check exactly what you will need to pay before committing yourself. Exemption from VAT and road tax Disabled people do not have to pay VAT on equipment for daily living, wheelchairs, personal vehicles or on cars specially adapted to carry a disabled person in a wheelchair. See VAT Notice 701/7, VAT reliefs for disabled people for more information. You can get a copy from the HM Revenue and Customs helpline on 0845 010 9000 (you will need to give your postcode when you call). People who receive the higher rate mobility component of Disability Living Allowance don’t usually have to pay Vehicle Excise Duty (road tax) on their car." -- Carfree Cities http://www.carfree.com/ Promoting practical alternatives to car dependence - walking, cycling and public transport. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Doug wrote:
> Not only are disabled cyclists not generally recognised as such and > are banned from many areas where wheelchair users are allowed but they > are also excluded from many of the benefits enjoyed by disabled > motorists, such as the following....... [snip] > Exemption from VAT and road tax > > Disabled people do not have to pay VAT on equipment for daily living, > wheelchairs, personal vehicles or on cars specially adapted to carry a > disabled person in a wheelchair. See VAT Notice 701/7, .... Do your research first ? Disabled cyclists can get VAT free cycles under the above rules. I've seen one being sold by Kevin at D-Tek. Price of a trike with a few modifications to a disabled chap was VAT free, subject to completing various forms (much like the forms for cars, wheelchairs, etc). - Nigel -- Nigel Cliffe, Webmaster at http://www.2mm.org.uk/ |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 11 Jun, 08:25, "Nigel Cliffe" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
> Doug wrote: > > Not only are disabled cyclists not generally recognised as such and > > are banned from many areas where wheelchair users are allowed but they > > are also excluded from many of the benefits enjoyed by disabled > > motorists, such as the following....... > > [snip] > > > Exemption from VAT and road tax > > > Disabled people do not have to pay VAT on equipment for daily living, > > wheelchairs, personal vehicles or on cars specially adapted to carry a > > disabled person in a wheelchair. See VAT Notice 701/7, .... > > Do your research first ? > > Disabled cyclists can get VAT free cycles under the above rules. > I've seen one being sold by Kevin at D-Tek. Price of a trike with a few > modifications to a disabled chap was VAT free, subject to completing various > forms (much like the forms for cars, wheelchairs, etc). > What about the other benefits mentioned? -- Carfree Cities http://www.carfree.com/ Promoting practical alternatives to car dependence - walking, cycling and public transport. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Doug writtificated
> What about the other benefits mentioned? I may not be right about this, and you should probably check this out for yourself, but I think disabled cyclists don't have to pay vehicle excise duty on their bicycles either. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 11 Jun, 08:25, "Nigel Cliffe" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
> > Disabled cyclists can get VAT free cycles under the above rules. How can I get this? I am about to buy a new bike. I am not "certified" disabled, but could get a doctors letter. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 03:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
bornfree <justyouandme@xemaps.com> wrote: > On 11 Jun, 08:25, "Nigel Cliffe" <m...@privacy.net> wrote: > > > > Disabled cyclists can get VAT free cycles under the above rules. > > How can I get this? > > I am about to buy a new bike. I am not "certified" disabled, but could > get a doctors letter. ITYF you need to be getting DLA/SDA to qualify, and be buying something built/modified to cope with your particular disability. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Doug wrote:
> Not only are disabled cyclists not generally recognised as such and > are banned from many areas where wheelchair users are allowed but they > are also excluded from many of the benefits enjoyed by disabled > motorists, such as the following. [snip] No, you're wrong. The fact that a particular person owned a bicycle would not prevent them (if disabled) from being eligible for a car under the Motability scheme (or whatever it's now called). So they'd be treated exactly the same as anyone else. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Nigel Cliffe wrote:
> Doug wrote: >> Not only are disabled cyclists not generally recognised as such and >> are banned from many areas where wheelchair users are allowed but they >> are also excluded from many of the benefits enjoyed by disabled >> motorists, such as the following....... > > [snip] > >> Exemption from VAT and road tax >> >> Disabled people do not have to pay VAT on equipment for daily living, >> wheelchairs, personal vehicles or on cars specially adapted to carry a >> disabled person in a wheelchair. See VAT Notice 701/7, .... > > Do your research first ? > > Disabled cyclists can get VAT free cycles under the above rules. > I've seen one being sold by Kevin at D-Tek. Price of a trike with a few > modifications to a disabled chap was VAT free, subject to completing various > forms (much like the forms for cars, wheelchairs, etc). But why would a *disabled* person want a VAT-free *bicycle* when they could get a car for almost nothing? |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
JNugent <JN@NPPTG.com> wrote:
> But why would a *disabled* person want a VAT-free *bicycle* when they > could get a car for almost nothing? The last time I checked, the running costs of a bicycle were significantly less than the running costs of a car. Cheers, Luke -- Red Rose Ramblings, the diary of an Essex boy in exile in Lancashire <http://www.shrimper.org.uk> |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ekul Namsob wrote:
> JNugent <JN@NPPTG.com> wrote: >> But why would a *disabled* person want a VAT-free *bicycle* when they >> could get a car for almost nothing? > The last time I checked, the running costs of a bicycle were > significantly less than the running costs of a car. Yes, but there's the question of the disabled person being fit enough to ride a bicycle, which is more physically demanding than sitting at the wheel of a car. I would expect that the Motability scheme would require a significant level of disability before free cars were handed out, and there is obvious scope for tension between the competing requirements for being classified as "disabled" and for being fit to ride a bike. Of course, some disabilities may not have much outward sign. |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Doug wrote:
> On 11 Jun, 08:25, "Nigel Cliffe" <m...@privacy.net> wrote: >> Doug wrote: >>> Not only are disabled cyclists not generally recognised as such and >>> are banned from many areas where wheelchair users are allowed but they >>> are also excluded from many of the benefits enjoyed by disabled >>> motorists, such as the following....... >> [snip] >> >>> Exemption from VAT and road tax >>> Disabled people do not have to pay VAT on equipment for daily living, >>> wheelchairs, personal vehicles or on cars specially adapted to carry a >>> disabled person in a wheelchair. See VAT Notice 701/7, .... >> Do your research first ? >> >> Disabled cyclists can get VAT free cycles under the above rules. >> I've seen one being sold by Kevin at D-Tek. Price of a trike with a few >> modifications to a disabled chap was VAT free, subject to completing various >> forms (much like the forms for cars, wheelchairs, etc). >> > What about the other benefits mentioned? > > Disabled cyclists don't have to pay road tax ( neither does anyone else) and they don't haver to pay for "cars specially adapted to carry a disabled person in a wheelchair" It looks to me as if they are treated in the same way a disabled car driver is, they are given a mobility allowance and get to spend it how they want! |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
JNugent wrote:
> Ekul Namsob wrote: > >> JNugent <JN@NPPTG.com> wrote: > >>> But why would a *disabled* person want a VAT-free *bicycle* when >>> they could get a car for almost nothing? > >> The last time I checked, the running costs of a bicycle were >> significantly less than the running costs of a car. > > Yes, but there's the question of the disabled person being fit enough > to ride a bicycle, which is more physically demanding than sitting at > the wheel of a car. I would expect that the Motability scheme would > require a significant level of disability before free cars were > handed out, and there is obvious scope for tension between the > competing requirements for being classified as "disabled" and for > being fit to ride a bike. Hmm, so certain that their is a heirarchy where the car is at the top. Not all people are capable of independently controlling a car regardless of how many modifications are made to the controls. They might be capable of independently controlling a cycle. Wierd though it may seem to some, not everyone wants a car. It may help if, in some circumstances, you think of a cycle as a wheelchair which happens to use leg rather than arm muscles to propel it along. A leg-propelled wheelchair which gives someone the ability to travel independently for several miles, rather than walk a few yards with severe difficulty, would appear to be a mobility aid. - Nigel -- Nigel Cliffe, Webmaster at http://www.2mm.org.uk/ |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
JNugent wrote:
> Ekul Namsob wrote: > >> JNugent <JN@NPPTG.com> wrote: > >>> But why would a *disabled* person want a VAT-free *bicycle* when they >>> could get a car for almost nothing? > >> The last time I checked, the running costs of a bicycle were >> significantly less than the running costs of a car. > > Yes, but there's the question of the disabled person being fit enough to > ride a bicycle, which is more physically demanding than sitting at the > wheel of a car. I would expect that the Motability scheme would require > a significant level of disability before free cars were handed out, and > there is obvious scope for tension between the competing requirements > for being classified as "disabled" and for being fit to ride a bike. > > Of course, some disabilities may not have much outward sign. A person with faulty legs would be perfectly capable of using a hand powered trike. I must admit that someone with a dicky ticker would be less able and would be better off with a car. |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 11, 5:26*pm, JNugent <J...@NPPTG.com> wrote:
> Ekul Namsob wrote: > > JNugent <J...@NPPTG.com> wrote: > >> But why would a *disabled* person want a VAT-free *bicycle* when they > >> could get a car for almost nothing? > > The last time I checked, the running costs of a bicycle were > > significantly less than the running costs of a car. > > Yes, but there's the question of the disabled person being fit enough to > ride a bicycle, which is more physically demanding than sitting at the > wheel of a car. Why should it follow that a disabled person is unfit? Later this year you will see many people with disabilities competing at the paralympics. I guess most of them are at least as fit as me, and a lot of them would beat me at their own sports. And many of them will be disabled to the extent of needing adaptations to ordinary facilities to let them travel. Probably quite a lot of disabled people are unfit because of difficulties in taking exercise. If they can use an adapted bike/ trike, it would bring great health benefits. Cycling slowly also requires less energy than walking, so the fitness level to get started isn't that high. Rob |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabled motorists?
Perhaps because cars cost a huge amount more to run than bicycles (even without the artificial extra costs)? Perhaps because the car is a proper, necessary, useful form of transport that disabled people actually want to, and are able to, use (how many disabled cyclists do *you* see)? Don't forget, trolls, Doug is a self-confessed motorist-hater, so his views are clearly nothing like yours. No doubt Doug would like every single disabled person to get rid of their car and get on a bicycle, and that's what this topic is *really* about. No doubt he'd like disabled motorists' benefits to end, to "encourage" them to take the "correct" form of transport (and if they physically can't cycle, then tough...car use must end, and that's that). Perhaps he should go round telling disabled drivers that they're "addicted" to their cars. Most of them would hopefully have at least two limbs with which to beat the shit out of him. I should think that disabled people, for whom the car is the only practical form of transport, get even more fed up than others at the constant persecution faced by motorists. They're the ones who suffer the most, and it shows how cold-hearted and callous the trolls who advocate anti-motorist measures really are. The trolls purport to think it's fair that a disabled person who's caught driving safely at 35 in a 30 four times in three years is banned. They purport to think that that's in the public interest. They know it isn't really, of course; but it is in the callous, rabid motorist-hating bastards' interest. Bullying disabled people with anti-motorist measures: they're the lowest of the low. Pure scum. |
|