![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#91 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Bill Sornson wrote:
> What percentage of Americans saw or heard about this photo? 1%? Maybe 2%? > > Huge stir...right! LOL > > More people every day. http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyl...hat_bicycl.html Don't knock Obama for wearing that bicycle helmet Tell him you want more specifics on health care. Scold him for calling a reporter "Sweetie." But when it comes to bicycle helmets, give Barack a break. Proving again that some bloggers will do anything to avoid turning off their computers, presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama was roasted on the Net this week for the outfit he wore when he and his wife took their daughters for a bike ride along Lake Michigan. His jeans weren't properly tailored. He wore the wrong shoes and the wrong color socks. His helmet looked dorky. I suppose in theory all that is arguable. I'm not sure it's the standards by which we should measure a President, but then, democracy is a system under which the most carefully considered vote can be canceled 30 seconds later by someone who thinks the other candidate has a better butt. I do know this, however. Whatever his culpability for the jeans, shoes and socks, Barack cannot be blamed for the helmet. [more] |
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Ron Ruff" <rruffrruff@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e1518f8a-da68-4e2a-a147-7b33b3790edb@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > > This is the point you keep missing... they don't own ANYTHING except a > debt on something that is worth far less than they paid for it. Tell me Ron, do you want to tell people who are buying a house and are still ahead of the game that they were being screwed by buying a house for a smaller down payment and longer payments? >> Why do I have the idea that you own nothing? > > I own 16 acres of beautiful land at the moment... paved roads, > utilities, etc... 8 miles from Ruidoso, NM. Just bought it last year > for $79K... and I don't think it is worth less than I paid, since the > frenzy didn't happen here... which is one big reason I moved here. So let me see - you live in a place where you don't have to be rich in order to own property and a home and you're telling ME that people who want to own homes here shouldn't? Or, wait, that the hoops that they have to jump through in order to own homes are too high? Now it's time for you to pretend that you didn't manage to understand what I originally wrote which was that the overwhelming majority of people who used the lower down payments and longer loans are still ahead of the game if not as much as they were. |
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Ozark Bicycle" <bicycleatelier@ozarkbicycleservice.com> wrote in message
news:c4dfbf92-27ba-4868-9528-983afd1abc76@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... > > Be sure to let me know if Obama: > > *falls asleep in staff meetings and cabinet meetings > > *runs the deficit through the roof > > *can't tell the difference between an ex-president and a ball player > > *allows his wife to hire astrologers to help shape policy > > *presides over a constitution-bending escapade in the fashion of "Iran- > Contra" I notice that you're a great reader of those newspapers that you can see in the checkout line at the grocery store. But I never thought that someone that could actually write would believe any of that cock and bull. |
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Eric Vey" <junker@ericvey.com> wrote in message
news:g2r496$f05$3@news.datemas.de... > > Apparently you don't watch Fox enough. Either that or you do nothing else. |
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Bill Sornson wrote:
> Eric Vey wrote: >> Tom Kunich wrote: >>> "Ozark Bicycle" <bicycleatelier@ozarkbicycleservice.com> wrote in >>> message >>> news:bc10315b-1ce4-4df8-af99-fb88e048af51@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... >>>> Are you saying that Obama is the Dem version of Ronnie Raygun? >>> My guess is that McCain vs. Obama will be very close MOSTLY because >>> people will vote for the opposite candidate in order to prevent their >>> own stupid candidate from getting into office. >>> >>> If Obama gets into office I fully intend to remind you of the stuff >>> you wrote here after he has shown his stripes. >>> >> Why don't you be honest for a change? It will be close because all the >> ex-Wallace voters joined the Republican party. > > You mean like Robert "KKK" Byrd? Or maybe Clinton's politcal mentor (and > leading Segregationist), J. William Fulbright? (Just Google "The Southern > Manifesto" if this is shocking news to you.) Or Confederate apologist Jim > Webb? > > AFAIK, none of these bigots has turned Republican. > > HTH (BKIW) > > Then who voted for Wallace? He did pretty well. Ten million people voted for him. Do you think they were the same people that voted for McGovern in '72? Since you seem to have this huge memory loss concerning Reagan, I'll help you out as to Wallace in '68. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Wallace Wallace ran for President in the 1968 election as the American Independent Party candidate. He hoped to force the House of Representatives to decide the election by receiving enough electoral votes, presumably giving him the role of a power broker. Wallace hoped that southern states could use their clout to end federal efforts at desegregation. His platform contained generous increases for beneficiaries of Social Security and Medicare. Nixon worried Wallace might steal enough votes to give the election to the Democratic candidate, Vice President Hubert Humphrey. Some Democrats feared Wallace's appeal to blue-collar workers and union members would hurt Humphrey in Northern states like Ohio, New Jersey, and Michigan. Wallace ran a "law and order" campaign similar to Nixon's. Further information: Southern strategy When Wallace pledged to run over any demonstrators who got in front of his limousine and asserted the four letter words hippies did not know were w-o-r-k and s-o-a-p, his rhetoric became famous. He accused Humphrey and Nixon of wanting to radically desegregate the South. Wallace said, "There's not a dime's worth of difference between the Democrat and Republican Parties." His campaign was supported by the John Birch Society.[citation needed] While most of the media opposed Wallace, some southern newspapers enthusiastically backed him. George W. Shannon (1914–1998) of the now defunct Shreveport Journal, wrote countless editorials supporting the third-party concept. Wallace repaid Shannon by appearing at Shannon's retirement dinner. While Wallace carried five Southern states and won almost ten million popular votes, Nixon received 31 electoral votes more than needed to win the election. Wallace remains the last non-Democrat, non-Republican candidate to win any electoral votes. He was the first person since Harry F. Byrd, an independent segregationist candidate in the 1960 presidential election. (John Hospers in 1972, Ronald Reagan in 1976, Lloyd Bentsen in 1988 and John Edwards in 2004 all received one electoral vote from dissenters, but none "won" these votes.) Wallace also received the vote of one North Carolina elector who was pledged to Nixon. Many found Wallace an entertaining campaigner. To hippies who called him a Nazi, he replied, "I was killing fascists when you punks were in diapers." Another quote: "They're building a bridge over the Potomac for all the white liberals fleeing to Virginia." |
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
> "Eric Vey" <junker@ericvey.com> wrote in message > news:g2r496$f05$3@news.datemas.de... >> >> Apparently you don't watch Fox enough. > > Either that or you do nothing else. Wonder if these guys will get the support like the swiftboat guys did? http://www.usvetdsp.com/mccainpic.htm John McCain, the second term Republican senator from Arizona and former Navy pilot captured and held prisoner during the Vietnam War, is a fraud, collaborator, and danger to the security of the United States. McCain, who claims he was brutally tortured by the communist Vietnamese, ironically emerged, as early as 1986, as Hanoi's leading advocate for normalized relations with the United States. McCain's high-profile and unrelenting support for a government that brutally tortured and murdered his fellow POWs has caused POW/MIA family members and fellow Vietnam veterans to question the senator and his motivations. [more] |
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Eric Vey wrote:
> John Forrest Tomlinson wrote: >> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:01:38 -0700 (PDT), Ozark Bicycle >> <bicycleatelier@ozarkbicycleservice.com> wrote: >> >>> Be sure to let me know if Obama: >> >>> *allows his wife to hire astrologers to help shape policy >> >> Well, maybe she won't do that, but she has said she wants to "kill >> whitey" and "f2ck whitey." There's supposedly a video of this out >> there and even the liberal media hasn't reported that Obama denies it. >> So there you go. >> >> But I'm not a racist. > > Uhmm. When McCain was running in 2000, I heard from "very reliable > sources" that he was never quite right in the head after his stay in > Hanoi and that he had a secret black baby. > > The liberal media asked him about these things and he denied it, but we > can't believe anything these liars say. > > So has he been miraculously cured from his mental problems and where has > the baby gone? Wait! The mental problem story is back! Here you go: http://www.usvetdsp.com/mar08/mccain_manchurian.htm John McCain: The Manchurian Candidate connection: Where is the liberal press when we need them? |
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Eric Vey" <junker@ericvey.com> wrote in message
news:g2r88u$lfc$2@news.datemas.de... > > McCain, who claims he was brutally tortured by the communist Vietnamese, > ironically emerged, as early as 1986, as Hanoi's leading advocate for > normalized relations with the United States. Funny, I was in that war as well and I also thought that normalized relations were better. And I didn't even have to be captured and tortured. |
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Eric Vey" <junker@ericvey.com> wrote in message
news:g2r808$lfc$1@news.datemas.de... > > Then who voted for Wallace? He did pretty well. Ten million people voted > for him. Do you think they were the same people that voted for McGovern in > '72? Psst - Wallace was a Democrat. When he couldn't be nominated for his party he ran under the American Independent Party banner. Be sure and use idiot sources to describe Wallace. No matter what his personal feelings might have been, and BTW those were never really clear, his actions demonstrated not that he wanted and end to desegregation but rather and end to it "overnight" which caused huge problems in the USA which we are just now getting over nearly 50 years later. Oh, that's right - you think that we're still in the deepest realms of slavery days. |
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 10, 3:27 pm, Eric Vey <jun...@ericvey.com> wrote:
> This really is over the top. > > http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/was...obama-on-a.html > In an article in today's New York Daily News, writer David Saltonstall > shows no mercy, declaring: "It wasn't a pretty picture: ill-fitting > jeans, a tucked-in golf shirt, black-and-white socks and a helmet that > could make Michael Dukakis blush." No offense but scolding people for wrong socks when they are just out to relax on their bike can only come from some Hollywood-gossip-obsessed gay-fashion-police bottom feeding junk columnist that suffers from serious reality detachment. Who cares about a fashion statement on a bike? Tire pressure is legit subject - perhaps it is affected by pulling a trailer? |
|
|
|
#101 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
> "Eric Vey" <junker@ericvey.com> wrote in message > news:g2r88u$lfc$2@news.datemas.de... >> >> McCain, who claims he was brutally tortured by the communist >> Vietnamese, ironically emerged, as early as 1986, as Hanoi's leading >> advocate for normalized relations with the United States. > > Funny, I was in that war as well and I also thought that normalized > relations were better. And I didn't even have to be captured and tortured. > Too lazy to click on the link? "According to documentation obtained by the U.S. Veteran Dispatch, not only did POW McCain promise to give the communists "military information" in exchange for special hospital care not ordinarily available to U.S. prisoners, but he also made numerous antiwar radio broadcasts. Article V of the Code of Conduct is very specific in declaring that U.S. military personnel are required to avoid answering questions to the utmost of their ability and to make no oral or written statements disloyal to the United States and its allies or harmful to their cause. Any violation of this code is considered collaborating with the enemy. The following is McCain's own admission of collaboration in an article he wrote, printed May 14, 1973 in U.S. News and World Report: "I think it was on the fourth day [after being shot down] that two guards came in, instead of one. One of them pulled back the blanket to show the other guard my injury. I looked at my knee. It was about the size, shape and color of a football. I remembered that when I was a flying instructor a fellow had ejected from his plane and broken his thigh. He had gone into shock, the blood had pooled in his leg, and he died, which came as quite a surprise to usa man dying of a broken leg. Then I realized that a very similar thing was happening to me. "When I saw it, I said to the guard, `O.K., get the officer.' "An officer came in after a few minutes. It was the man that we came to know very well as `The Bug.' He was a psychotic torturer, one of the worst fiends that we had to deal with. I said, `O.K., I'll give you military information if you will take me to the hospital.'" McCain claims it was only a coincidence that, about the same time he was begging to be taken to a hospital, the Vietnamese learned his father was Admiral John S. McCain, Jr., commander of all U.S. forces in Europe and soontobe commander of all U.S. forces in the Pacific, including Vietnam. McCain has admitted that he survived only because the Vietnamese learned who his father was and rushed him to a hospital where his wounds were eagerly treated. He has also conceded that the Vietnamese repeatedly threatened to withhold much needed operations unless he would give them information. The former POW admitted in the U.S. News and World Report article that the Vietnamese usually left other U.S. prisoners with similar wounds to die, not wishing to waste medication on them. McCain pointed out "there were hardly any amputees among the prisoners who came back because the North Vietnamese just would not give medical treatment to someone who was badly injured. They weren't going to waste their time." The communists figured that because POW McCain's father was of such high military rank, McCain was of royalty and the governing circle. They bragged that they had captured "the crown prince" and treated him as a "special prisoner." |
|
|
|
#102 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
> "Eric Vey" <junker@ericvey.com> wrote in message > news:g2r808$lfc$1@news.datemas.de... >> >> Then who voted for Wallace? He did pretty well. Ten million people >> voted for him. Do you think they were the same people that voted for >> McGovern in '72? > > Psst - Wallace was a Democrat. When he couldn't be nominated for his > party he ran under the American Independent Party banner. That's right! Gosh, you sure are smart! These days, all the Southern states vote for Republican presidents. Follow along now: Where did those 10 million voters go in the following elections? You don't think they voted for (Gasp!) Nixon or Reagan, do you? Since registered Republicans were a minority then, how did Nixon and Reagan win? |
|
|
|
#103 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 12, 9:10 am, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> "Ron Ruff" <rruffrr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:e1518f8a-da68-4e2a-a147-7b33b3790edb@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > > > > > This is the point you keep missing... they don't own ANYTHING except a > > debt on something that is worth far less than they paid for it. > > Tell me Ron, do you want to tell people who are buying a house and are still > ahead of the game that they were being screwed by buying a house for a > smaller down payment and longer payments? Tom, don't whitewash the speculative lending scams. http://www.newsweek.com/id/138503 - Frank Krygowski |
|
|
|
#104 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ozark Bicycle wrote:
> On Jun 11, 5:27 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote: >> "Ozark Bicycle" <bicycleatel...@ozarkbicycleservice.com> wrote in message >> >> news:bc10315b-1ce4-4df8-af99-fb88e048af51@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... >> > <on Kunichs assertion that Obama is a puppet and a bumbling > incompetent> >> >>> Are you saying that Obama is the Dem version of Ronnie Raygun? > <snip> >> If Obama gets into office I fully intend to remind you of the stuff you >> wrote here after he has shown his stripes. > > Be sure to let me know if Obama: > > *falls asleep in staff meetings and cabinet meetings > > *runs the deficit through the roof > > *can't tell the difference between an ex-president and a ball player > > *allows his wife to hire astrologers to help shape policy > > *presides over a constitution-bending escapade in the fashion of "Iran- > Contra" Wait, are we still talking about Reagan? The Republicans were challenged to produce a president worse than Reagan, and they were finally able to deliver with W. |
|
|
|
#105 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Frank Krygowski wrote:
> On Jun 12, 9:10 am, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote: >> "Ron Ruff" <rruffrr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> news:e1518f8a-da68-4e2a-a147-7b33b3790edb@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >>> This is the point you keep missing... they don't own ANYTHING except a >>> debt on something that is worth far less than they paid for it. >> Tell me Ron, do you want to tell people who are buying a house and are still >> ahead of the game that they were being screwed by buying a house for a >> smaller down payment and longer payments? > > Tom, don't whitewash the speculative lending scams. > > http://www.newsweek.com/id/138503 > > - Frank Krygowski Newsweek? That Pinko rag? |
|