![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
....but if anyone offers to meet you at the the Starbucks in Westminster,
CO, well, don't bring a knife: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...encarry7-2008ju n07,0,2510183.story?page=1 -- Ryan Cousineau rcousine@gmail.com http://www.wiredcola.com/ "In other newsgroups, they killfile trolls." "In rec.bicycles.racing, we coach them." |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 7, 3:32 pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...but if anyone offers to meet you at the the Starbucks in Westminster, > CO, well, don't bring a knife: > > http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...encarry7-2008ju > n07,0,2510183.story?page=1 Is this acceptable? |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Robert Chung wrote:
> On Jun 7, 3:32 pm, Ryan Cousineau wrote: >> http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...83.story?page=1 > > Is this acceptable? No. Not even for Trdina. Apaling! |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 7, 8:58*pm, Ted van de Weteringe <myfulln...@xs4all.nl.invalid>
wrote: > Robert Chung wrote: > > On Jun 7, 3:32 pm, Ryan Cousineau wrote: > >>http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...a-opencarry7-20... > > > Is this acceptable? > > No. Not even for Trdina. Apaling! They're idiots for a bunch of reasons but why is it appalling? Any criminal isn't going to be carrying in plain sight until they're going to use it for something. Once again the middle ground is somewhere between these idiots and Massachusetts. A few years ago here after they changed the laws a couple of local police chiefs were areesting hunters and confiscati ng their weapons as they carried them "on a public way" when they got out of their cars and stepped onto the pavement to lock them in their trunks as required to leave the car. By law any weapon has to be in a locked case if you are near a public way. Makes it tough to hunt pheasants and such out on the dirt farm roads, which are almost all public ways here. These are the same idiots who's last set of laws made a criminal of the Speaker of the Mass. House for the Revolutionary War musket that hangs in the State house. Under his latest idiocy, he was responsible for it being improperly secured. The Gun Owners Action League asked the A.G. to enforce the law, and they cited him. The next day the exempted themselves from the law. That seems to be pretty common among the anti-gun elites. One of them, Rosie I think, was commenting that people don't need guns they can just hire bodyguards. Both Fienstein and Boxer have concealed carry, personal protection permits, that you can't get. They say it's because they are more important than you. Plenty of idiots to go around on this including at the NRA. Bill C |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 7, 6:38*pm, Robert Chung <rech...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 7, 3:32 pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > ...but if anyone offers to meet you at the the Starbucks in Westminster, > > CO, well, don't bring a knife: > > >http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...a-opencarry7-20... > > n07,0,2510183.story?page=1 > > Is this acceptable? I hope Queeksdraw there knows the hammer is supposed to be resting on an open chamber. Security snap loop, on! Barrel, long! Odds of successfully using that hogleg to defend yourself against a mugger*, pretty low! *new gang initiation-- kill someone with their own gun. Much more macho than a pansy-ass drive-by, any day! --D-y |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 8, 9:24*pm, "dustoyev...@mac.com" <dustoyev...@mac.com> wrote:
> On Jun 7, 6:38*pm, Robert Chung <rech...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 7, 3:32 pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > ...but if anyone offers to meet you at the the Starbucks in Westminster, > > > CO, well, don't bring a knife: > > > >http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...a-opencarry7-20.... > > > n07,0,2510183.story?page=1 > > > Is this acceptable? > > I hope Queeksdraw there knows the hammer is supposed to be resting on > an open chamber. > > Security snap loop, on! > > Barrel, long! > > Odds of successfully using that hogleg to defend yourself against a > mugger*, pretty low! > > *new gang initiation-- kill someone with their own gun. Much more > macho than a pansy-ass drive-by, any day! *--D-y You're thinking about practical considerations. I don't get the impression practicality is really No. 1 here. Even in the Wild West, didn't some saloons say "check your weapons at the door"? I live in Arizona, which is a concealed-carry state. A friend of mine's out-of-state brother-in-law is, as he said, "from the hood," and one of his survival skills is noting unusual bulges. He visited and went to the supermarket with his sister, and kept nudging her and saying, "Hey, that guy's packing!" I guess even in the hood, they don't all carry in the supermarket. I'm still hopeful that the state congerzmen won't overturn our weapon ban on campus. Undergraduates + guns doesn't strike me as a good combo. Sure, professors who packed would probably have to deal with fewer arguments from grade-grubbing premeds, but I'll take that tradeoff. Finally, though, and obviously you need open-carry, not concealed for this, there are claims that riding bike with heat cuts down on the hassles from cagers. And hey, Cabela's now has a carbon fiber holster. Ben |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <afdd2688-982c-4c52-b097-239328cdc5c1@w4g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
"bjw@mambo.ucolick.org" <bjw@mambo.ucolick.org> wrote: > On Jun 8, 9:24*pm, "dustoyev...@mac.com" <dustoyev...@mac.com> wrote: > > On Jun 7, 6:38*pm, Robert Chung <rech...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 7, 3:32 pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > ...but if anyone offers to meet you at the the Starbucks in Westminster, > > > > CO, well, don't bring a knife: > > > > > >http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...a-opencarry7-20... > > > > n07,0,2510183.story?page=1 > > > > > Is this acceptable? > > > > I hope Queeksdraw there knows the hammer is supposed to be resting on > > an open chamber. > > > > Security snap loop, on! > > > > Barrel, long! > > > > Odds of successfully using that hogleg to defend yourself against a > > mugger*, pretty low! > > > > *new gang initiation-- kill someone with their own gun. Much more > > macho than a pansy-ass drive-by, any day! *--D-y > > You're thinking about practical considerations. I don't > get the impression practicality is really No. 1 here. > Even in the Wild West, didn't some saloons say "check > your weapons at the door"? I'd bet the people who're in favor of open carry have a different opinion in this situation: http://tinyurl.com/4y9j4v > I live in Arizona, which is a concealed-carry state. > A friend of mine's out-of-state brother-in-law is, as he said, > "from the hood," and one of his survival skills is noting > unusual bulges. He visited and went to the supermarket > with his sister, and kept nudging her and saying, "Hey, > that guy's packing!" I guess even in the hood, they don't > all carry in the supermarket. > > I'm still hopeful that the state congerzmen won't overturn > our weapon ban on campus. Undergraduates + guns > doesn't strike me as a good combo. Sure, professors who > packed would probably have to deal with fewer arguments > from grade-grubbing premeds, but I'll take that tradeoff. After the second big school shooting a few months ago (Northern Illinois University), a bunch of the all guns, all the time types got it into their heads to start saying that everyone at those schools should be *required* to carry at all times to prevent those kinds of things from happening. I thought about the case of Amadou Diallo - the police who shot him were trained and required to go to the range and show some level of proficiency, yet they only got 19 hits out of 41 shots (yes, "only" was more than enough to do the job). Can you imagine the results of a bunch of people who aren't trained to the (alleged) levels of proficiency of the cops blasting away in a situation like the Virginia Tech or Northern Illinois University? -- tanx, Howard The bloody pubs are bloody dull The bloody clubs are bloody full Of bloody girls and bloody guys With bloody murder in their eyes remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 9, 2:55*am, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> > * *After the second big school shooting a few months ago (Northern Illinois > University), a bunch of the all guns, all the time types got it into theirheads to > start saying that everyone at those schools should be *required* to carry at all > times to prevent those kinds of things from happening. I thought about thecase of > Amadou Diallo - the police who shot him were trained and required to go tothe range > and show some level of proficiency, yet they only got 19 hits out of 41 shots (yes, > "only" was more than enough to do the job). Can you imagine the results ofa bunch of > people who aren't trained to the (alleged) levels of proficiency of the cops blasting > away in a situation like the Virginia Tech or Northern Illinois University? > > -- > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * tanx, > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Howard > > * * * * * * * * * *The bloody pubs are bloody dull > * * * * * * * * * *The bloody clubs are bloody full > * * * * * * * * * *Of bloody girls and bloody guys > * * * * * * * * * *With bloody murder in their eyes > > * * * * * * * * * * *remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Let's face it Howard cops are about the worst people to be running around with guns. Take the bad attitude, and then combine that with a total lack of will to learn or practice, "'cause I already know my shit!" and they are a disaster looking for a place to happen. It's not all of them, but a ton. Especially in urbanized areas where firearms aren't part of everyday life, and finding somewhere to shoot is a hassle. They do qualification once a year, if they show for it, and thats about it. The closest range here, is 10 minutes away. I won't use it. It's the local club for all the cops. There's more drinking than shooting happening there, despite the rules banning alcohol. "Hey, we are the law, so STFU!". It's expensive, unless you are a cop, and filled with the worst of the bunch so I drive about an hour out into the hills to a small town range that's more likely to have a family, or a class for kids going on, or be empty. All that aside it's ridiculous to deny people the right to defend themselves. For years Mass. law said that if someone breaks into your house, you HAVE TO escape, no other options, and they did criminalise the people living there. You were required to abandon your property under penalty of the State. That's been changes to be more reasonable now, but you are still more likely to face charges, or a lawsuit here, than the intruder if you don't abandon your property to them. mandatory cary is, what it plainly is, an extremist political ploy, and insane in reality. People don't want to face the issue that it's society that's the problem, not the tools. Vt. has almost no violent crime/firearm crime and has very libertatian laws. Most places getting a pistol, legally, is a lot tougher than getting booze/drugs and a car, and the stats show the results from it. Now lots of places are into knife bans, nothing over 3 inches out on the street. OK, how do I get my new kitchen set home without breaking the law, or being harrassed by some prick cop with a problem? We gonna allow for, no cause, random searches to try and disarm the criminals, and those folks who haven't registered their stuff? Make the screening, complete, make folks complete a good training course, make them retest and do refresher training if you want, then let the law abiding folks have what the criminals already do. All these laws do is hammer law abiding folks, criminals by definition dont obey them. Then due to overcrowding the mandatory firearms offenses get plea-bargained away, if they aren't actually used on someone, to keep the jail space open. More freedom for responsible people is always a good thing. Bill C |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 9, 2:55*am, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> In article <afdd2688-982c-4c52-b097-239328cdc...@w4g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, > > * *I'd bet the people who're in favor of open carry have a different opinion in this > situation: > > http://tinyurl.com/4y9j4v My opinion is that you're probably right, make it a pic of an anti- government, all white militia and they would have a different opinion too, for the most part is my guess. There'd be the few wingnut libertarians arguing that the right should be abridged in any way, even after murder convictions, etc...though. > > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * tanx, > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Howard > > * * * * * * * * * *The bloody pubs are bloody dull > * * * * * * * * * *The bloody clubs are bloody full > * * * * * * * * * *Of bloody girls and bloody guys > * * * * * * * * * *With bloody murder in their eyes > > * * * * * * * * * * *remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Bill C |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article
<947c24be-76e5-46ba-a7c1-d2f66ba12c87@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, "dustoyevsky@mac.com" <dustoyevsky@mac.com> wrote: > On Jun 7, 6:38*pm, Robert Chung <rech...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jun 7, 3:32 pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > ...but if anyone offers to meet you at the the Starbucks in Westminster, > > > CO, well, don't bring a knife: > > > > >http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...a-opencarry7-20... > > > n07,0,2510183.story?page=1 > > > > Is this acceptable? > > I hope Queeksdraw there knows the hammer is supposed to be resting on > an open chamber. Naw. Rest the hammer between two chambers if you think it matters. -- Michael Press |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 9, 11:32 am, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article > <947c24be-76e5-46ba-a7c1-d2f66ba12...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, > > "dustoyev...@mac.com" <dustoyev...@mac.com> wrote: > > On Jun 7, 6:38 pm, Robert Chung <rech...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 7, 3:32 pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > ...but if anyone offers to meet you at the the Starbucks in Westminster, > > > > CO, well, don't bring a knife: > > > > >http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...a-opencarry7-20... > > > > n07,0,2510183.story?page=1 > > > > Is this acceptable? > > > I hope Queeksdraw there knows the hammer is supposed to be resting on > > an open chamber. > > Naw. Rest the hammer between two chambers if you think it matters. > > -- > Michael Press Hell yeah. Even "grandma gun nut" knows safety is for wusses: "Girl shoots herself with grandma's gun at SC store COLUMBIA, S.C. - A 4-year-old girl shot herself in the chest Monday after snatching her grandmother's handgun from the woman's purse while riding in a shopping cart at a Sam's Club store, authorities said. Concealed weapons permit holders in South Carolina are not allowed to carry weapons into buildings that prohibit it, or into government buildings, schools and daycare facilities, among other places. The Sam's Club store does not have a sign prohibiting guns inside." It amazes me how often these guns people have "fer safety, cuz uv all the nuts out there wif gunz" end up shooting family members. -Paul |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Paul G. wrote:
> Hell yeah. Even "grandma gun nut" knows safety is for wusses: > > "Girl shoots herself with grandma's gun at SC store > > COLUMBIA, S.C. - A 4-year-old girl shot herself in the chest Monday after > snatching her grandmother's handgun from the woman's purse while riding in > a shopping cart at a Sam's Club store, authorities said. At least she didn't have an Uzi in her purse. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 9, 10:31*pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
> > It amazes me how often these guns people have "fer safety, cuz uv all > the nuts out there wif gunz" end up shooting family members. > -Paul- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - It's not as often as they are used in self defense, but most of this shit is totally criminal. Grandam needs to be tried for reckless endangerment of a child, at a minimum, and this shit about how she feels bad, and seeing her kid wounded is enough punishment, isn't. It's really sad that common sense is so uncommon because freedoms and responsibilty go together and morons like this don't help the cause. Rant on for a second. NOTE You got kids keeps the shit seriously locked up, with the ammo locked seperately, or under your direct, immediate, continuous control, and then lock the shit up when you aren't using it. If you live in a low/moderate crime area and have kids playing Rambo and leaving the shit "stashed" around the house for "Fast access" is gonna get your kid, or other kids killed. Lock the shit up. They make shrinks to treat unfounded fear/anxiety disorders, not guns. Go see one. Hint, do the same things with the keys to the safes, and locks. Use a combo lock box for the safe keys so nothing is laying around. Weld the emergency keyhole shut, boxes are cheap compared to lives. Makes it almost impossible to pick, and if the box goes missing you KNOW something is up. Keep a spare key, either at the bank, or someone elses house. Just another note from experience; If you do things this way and the cops have to deal with something at your house they won't freak out over the firearms. They will ask if there are any in the house, and where they are, and how they are stored, guaranteed. Bill C |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 10, 4:57 am, Bill C <tritonri...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Jun 9, 10:31 pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > > > > > It amazes me how often these guns people have "fer safety, cuz uv all > > the nuts out there wif gunz" end up shooting family members. > > -Paul- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > It's not as often as they are used in self defense I think that wildly improbable. Most murders are committed by someone the victim knows. Google "murder suicide" or "shoots wife" and see how many hits you get. -Paul |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 9, 1:32*pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article > <947c24be-76e5-46ba-a7c1-d2f66ba12...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, > > *"dustoyev...@mac.com" <dustoyev...@mac.com> wrote: > > On Jun 7, 6:38*pm, Robert Chung <rech...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 7, 3:32 pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > ...but if anyone offers to meet you at the the Starbucks in Westminster, > > > > CO, well, don't bring a knife: > > > > >http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...a-opencarry7-20.... > > > > n07,0,2510183.story?page=1 > > > > Is this acceptable? > > > I hope Queeksdraw there knows the hammer is supposed to be resting on > > an open chamber. > > Naw. Rest the hammer between two chambers if you think it matters. Massad Ayoob, from <http://www.backwoodshome.com/articles2/ ayoob103.html> (quoting): Today, of course, we have modern revolvers with frontier styling that can be fully loaded with a live round under the hammer, in perfect safety. This is because an updated mechanism, usually involving a transfer bar, requires a pull of the trigger to fire the gun. However, most of us in the “gun biz” still carry all our single action revolvers with empty chambers under the hammers and recommend that our readers, students, and customers do the same. The reason is simple: A habit you get into with one gun will transfer to another one. If you get into the habit of carrying your modern Ruger New Model single action with a round under the firing pin, you’ll find yourself doing the same if the day comes that you carry an old Colt Single Action Army. It’s safe with the new style Ruger. It’s NOT safe with the old style Ruger or the Single Action Army. If you simply keep the chamber under the hammer empty with all single action revolvers, you’ve covered all the bases. (end quote) Not being "up" on the current state, etc. etc., but being aware this (hammer over empty chamber) was still a favored method among "pros", I went and looked. There's info there IRT older rifles that would discharge even when on half-cock "safe" when dropped or struck. And reference to "country people" who use this safety method generally on "repeaters". If there isn't a round in the chamber, the way I was taught, the gun can't fire except by deliberate manipulation meant to cause discharge. <http://www.firearmsid.com/A_FirearmFunction.htm> shows different safeties. Excellent. And closer to true fail-safe if the round under the hammer is empty. Belt and suspenders, thanks. And hey, if five (or four) shots don't get the job done at Starbucks... Queeksdraw's problem is still gonna be getting that hogleg out and pointed before something bad happens to him, extrapolating the Dirty Harry fantasy to a real-world conclusion. No hot dogs at Tarbucks, either. --D-y |
|