![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#46 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 16:33:39 -0700, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com>
wrote: >2) Even though you're being convinced by other Fascists that business is >evil, it is NORMAL PEOPLE who have invented and continue to insist on zoning >laws that lock housing farther and farther away from businesses. That >requires more and more commuting and more fuel usage. You might want to look up the definition of Fascism before using it in a sentence. |
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"still just me" <wheeledBobNOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:gohp44pqmd0fjlg2rfefhdevo0hru2c98o@4ax.com... > On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 16:33:39 -0700, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> > wrote: > >>2) Even though you're being convinced by other Fascists that business is >>evil, it is NORMAL PEOPLE who have invented and continue to insist on >>zoning >>laws that lock housing farther and farther away from businesses. That >>requires more and more commuting and more fuel usage. > > You might want to look up the definition of Fascism before using it in > a sentence. Apparently you could use a bit of your own suggestions. |
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 8, 12:19 am, "Bill Sornson" <as...@ask.me> wrote:
> You once again exceed your own standards of cluelessness. Well done. Tell me what you think is clueless so I can make fun of you more properly. |
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
r15757@aol.com wrote:
> On Jun 8, 12:19 am, "Bill Sornson" <as...@ask.me> wrote: >> You once again exceed your own standards of cluelessness. Well done. > Tell me what you think is clueless so I can make fun of you more > properly. I would but you conveniently DELETED everything you wrote! LOL Bill "can't say that I blame you" S. |
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Bill Sornson" <askme@ask.me> wrote in message
news:484d860f$0$12958$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... > r15757@aol.com wrote: >> On Jun 8, 12:19 am, "Bill Sornson" <as...@ask.me> wrote: > >>> You once again exceed your own standards of cluelessness. Well done. > >> Tell me what you think is clueless so I can make fun of you more >> properly. > > I would but you conveniently DELETED everything you wrote! LOL Can't say that wasn't a bit clueless..... |
|
|
|
#51 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 12:35:40 -0700, "Bill Sornson" <askme@ask.me>
wrote: >r15757@aol.com wrote: >> On Jun 8, 12:19 am, "Bill Sornson" <as...@ask.me> wrote: > >>> You once again exceed your own standards of cluelessness. Well done. > >> Tell me what you think is clueless so I can make fun of you more >> properly. > >I would but you conveniently DELETED everything you wrote! Bill, I've tried to explain it to you before and though it didn't work, I'll try again. Here goes: The internet is a shared resource, and usenet postings exist on many computers. They exist on a variety of news servers, they exist on web-based archives such as a via Google groups and, often, they even exist on your own computer. So while it may appear that someone has deleted something, they haven't removed it from everywhere. Copies exist. If what they deleted is a portion of something you wrote, you can probably find it in the outbox of your newsreader. Take a look. |
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
> At one time experience was valued. Now only education is valued and > often it demonstrates a sort of ignorance hard to understand by "normal" > people. I had to choose to hire between 15 college educated engineers > and I couldn't find ONE of them that actually could engineer anything. I blame that on the seemingly nationwide* switch from quarters to semesters. *Are the CA schools still on quarters? \\paul -- Paul M. Hobson ..:change the f to ph to reply:. |
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Paul M. Hobson" <fobson@gatech.edu> wrote in message
news:g2kpul$ges$1@news-int.gatech.edu... > Tom Kunich wrote: >> At one time experience was valued. Now only education is valued and often >> it demonstrates a sort of ignorance hard to understand by "normal" >> people. I had to choose to hire between 15 college educated engineers and >> I couldn't find ONE of them that actually could engineer anything. > > I blame that on the seemingly nationwide* switch from quarters to > semesters. > > *Are the CA schools still on quarters? I blame it on the failure to hire good teachers. |
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
>>> At one time experience was valued. Now only education is valued >>> and often it demonstrates a sort of ignorance hard to understand >>> by "normal" people. I had to choose to hire between 15 college >>> educated engineers and I couldn't find ONE of them that actually >>> could engineer anything. >> I blame that on the seemingly nationwide* switch from quarters to >> semesters. >> *Are the CA schools still on quarters? > I blame it on the failure to hire good teachers. I think blame lies with the attitude of students. One that the school is responsible for their learning, hand feeding them with "facts", a mode to which they have become previously accustomed. I also found in my education that there are many students who can pass exams but are not skilled in the application of the theory they can repeat for the exam. The best engineers I met were seldom students at the top of the honor roll. Jobst Brandt |
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 7, 4:14*pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> "A Muzi" <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote in message > > news:54589$484b146a$1873@news.teranews.com... > > > Tom Kunich wrote: > >> I wonder what these idiots think about when someone tells them that we > >> used mercurochrome as an antiseptic for half a century. > > > How about a couple million grammar-school-age boys (like me) who had a > > small container of liquid mercury and played around with it often? > > Metallic mercury is relatively inert - it's the active compounds which are > > dangerous. > > > no common sense any more. > > This appears to be what happens when the education system is taken over by > the Marxists (who even told us they were going to do it) and then most > subjects are simply not taught any more. It's not the Marxists -- they did a good job and produced some first class scientists, like Oppenheimer. Dumbing down can much later with the shift to affective education in the '70s, IMO. I was getting my secondary credential at the time and was amazed at the shift from content knowledge and application to feeling good about ones self. -- Jay Beattie. |
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org> wrote in message
news:484df1de$0$17159$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net... > Tom Kunich wrote: >> I blame it on the failure to hire good teachers. > > I think blame lies with the attitude of students. One that the school > is responsible for their learning, hand feeding them with "facts", a > mode to which they have become previously accustomed. I also found in > my education that there are many students who can pass exams but are > not skilled in the application of the theory they can repeat for the > exam. The best engineers I met were seldom students at the top of the > honor roll. I will completely agree with you that I've seldom found a good engineer that was a great student. Most people that turn into good engineers are a good bit more interested in things other than tests. |
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Jay Beattie" <jbeattie@lindsayhart.com> wrote in message
news:5cb26163-54fc-4fd1-8266-117eeaec5246@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com... On Jun 7, 4:14 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote: > > > > This appears to be what happens when the education system is taken over > > by > > the Marxists (who even told us they were going to do it) and then most > > subjects are simply not taught any more. > > It's not the Marxists -- they did a good job and produced some first > class scientists, like Oppenheimer. Uh, which Oppenheimer are you talking about? Robert and family were socialists. Franz Oppenheimer was also a socialist. Stephen Oppenheimer and Frank Oppenheimer weren't politically loud so I don't know what their politics were. > Dumbing down can much later with the shift to affective education in > the '70s, IMO. I was getting my secondary credential at the time and > was amazed at the shift from content knowledge and application to > feeling good about ones self. A lot of it was directed from the forward desk. Because 90% of teachers are just teachers doesn't mean you can ignore the 10% who are political saboteurs. Communists announced that they would take over the schools and teach socialism to our children and they simply did it. Question - how is it that someone like Angela Davis could be allowed to teach children? |
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Bill Sornson wrote:
> Tom Kunich wrote: >> Well, a report by the Paris-based International Energy Agency is >> saying that all we need to combat global warming is for every >> American family to be taxed $600,000 and that will be enough. For now. >> >> Hopefully EVERY American environmentalist will gladly step up to the >> plate and pay his share starting right now. > > If not too busy doing this: > > http://www.epa.gov/mercury/spills/index.htm#flourescent > > Fluorescent bulbs have been used in large quantities for decades, there has always been a problem of mercury contamination from disposal/breakage. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compac...cury_emissions: "According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), when coal power is used, less mercury is released when fluorescent lamps are used, even including mercury in the lamps." "The Albany Times Union reported that the annual mercury emissions of a single cement plant amounted to 400 pounds.[50] That amount roughly corresponds to the mercury content in 4,500 million compact fluorescent lamps." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil_fuel_power_plant: "Trace amounts of mercury exist in coal and other fossil fuels.[12] When these fuels burn, toxic mercury is released which accumulates in food chains and is especially harmful to aquatic ecosystems. The worldwide emission of mercury from both natural and human sources was an estimated 5,500 tons in 1995.[12] U.S. coal-fired plants emit an estimated 48 tons annually, which is approximately 1/3 of all mercury emitted into the air by human activity in the U.S.[12] In contrast, China's coal-fired power plants emitted an estimated 68 tons of mercury in 1999, which was about 38% of Chinese human-generated mercury emissions." |
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
> "Bill Sornson" <askme@ask.me> wrote in message > news:484b0086$0$31743$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... >> Tom Kunich wrote: >>> Well, a report by the Paris-based International Energy Agency is >>> saying that all we need to combat global warming is for every >>> American family to be taxed $600,000 and that will be enough. For now. >>> >>> Hopefully EVERY American environmentalist will gladly step up to the >>> plate and pay his share starting right now. >> >> If not too busy doing this: >> >> http://www.epa.gov/mercury/spills/index.htm#flourescent > > I wonder what these idiots think about when someone tells them that we > used mercurochrome as an antiseptic for half a century. > Which "idiots"? The FDA? They're "environmentalists" now? http://www.straightdope.com/columns/040723.html: "Mercurochrome and other drugs containing mercury came up for scrutiny as part of a general review of over-the-counter antiseptics that began in 1978," "While no one's offered evidence of mass Mercurochrome poisoning, the medical literature contains scattered reports of mercury toxicity due to use of the antiseptic, and these days the burden of proof is on drug manufacturers to show that their products' benefits outweigh the risks. In the case of Mercurochrome and many other mercury-containing compounds, that had never been done." "The FDA initially proposed clipping Mercurochrome's GRAS status in 1982 and asked for comment. Hearing little, the FDA classified the antiseptic as a "new drug," meaning that anyone proposing to sell it nationwide had to submit it to the same rigorous approval process required of a drug invented last month. (This took place in 1998--nobody's going to accuse the FDA of rushing to judgment.) " |
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
A Muzi wrote:
>>> Tom Kunich wrote: >>>> Well, a report by the Paris-based International Energy Agency is >>>> saying that all we need to combat global warming is for every >>>> American family to be taxed $600,000 and that will be enough. For now. > >> "Bill Sornson" <askme@ask.me> wrote >>>> Hopefully EVERY American environmentalist will gladly step up to the >>>> plate and pay his share starting right now. >>> If not too busy doing this: >>> http://www.epa.gov/mercury/spills/index.htm#flourescent > > Tom Kunich wrote: >> I wonder what these idiots think about when someone tells them that we >> used mercurochrome as an antiseptic for half a century. > > How about a couple million grammar-school-age boys (like me) who had a > small container of liquid mercury and played around with it often? > Metallic mercury is relatively inert - it's the active compounds which > are dangerous. > > no common sense any more. http://www.pcij.org/i-report/2007/mercury2.html: "St. Andrew’s was the Parañaque school where early last year at least 24 students, mostly aged 13, wound up in the hospital as confirmed cases of mercury poisoning. Investigation showed that the students were poisoned after they were allowed to play with 50 grams of mercury intended for a science experiment. The school had to remain closed for months while local and international experts cleaned up and decontaminated it." |
|