![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 4, 10:28*am, ilan...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jun 4, 7:56*am, hizark21 <hizar...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > ASO still refusing to admit Astana in TDF (http://www.cyclingnews.com/ > > news.php?id=news/2008/jun08/jun04news ). > > > It's simply ridiculous that the ASO is refusing to let Astana enter > > the TDF. *The ASO should have put forth a set of condtions for Astana > > to meet if they wished to enter the TDF. Astana is the dominant spring > > team now and they deserve to ride in the TDF. > > I would assume that ASO would argue that the good showing of Astana > proves that they're doping. That's the type of reasoning you're seeing > from the ASO management. Well, they were on vacation a week before the start and came there and kicked ass..'if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck'. Bruyneel and Contador is the problem, Astana has nothing to do with it. Vino was never a contender. > > Any argument about Astana ticking ASO off is specious, as Astana has > the right to participate, as a pro tour team. Even before the Pro > Tour, the top 15 rated teams were guaranteed a spot in the Tour de > France. Just another reason why the UCI is a necessary evil. > > -ilan |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:09:22 -0700, "Mike Jacoubowsky"
<MikeJ@ChainReaction.com> wrote: >The randomized controls found Rasmussen didn't they? No. |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 4, 1:36*pm, "Qui si parla Campagnolo-www.vecchios.com"
<pe...@vecchios.com> wrote: > On Jun 3, 11:56*pm, hizark21 <hizar...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > ASO still refusing to admit Astana in TDF (http://www.cyclingnews.com/ > > news.php?id=news/2008/jun08/jun04news ). > > > It's simply ridiculous that the ASO is refusing to let Astana enter > > the TDF. *The ASO should have put forth a set of condtions for Astana > > to meet if they wished to enter the TDF. Astana is the dominant spring > > team now and they deserve to ride in the TDF. > > Altho weird, as long as Bruyneel and Contador(true yellow jersey > contender but cloudy relationship with Operation Puerto, true or not) > are with Astana, ASO isn't going to let them in. ASO doesn't like > Bruyneel and the last thing ASO wants is another doping scandal with > the yellow jersey. No, with Contador and Bruyneel, the thing that worries ASO is another string of 7 consecutive victories. -ilan |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
> saying? That they're going to specifically target certain athletes because > of what happened last year, instead of randomized controls? I don't get it. > The randomized controls found Rasmussen didn't they? And Vino? And > Keschekin? But the fact that those guys were doping and caught is an > indication that doping controls aren't working? > After Vino's positive, I highly doubt that Kaschekin's test was 'random'. |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
>> The randomized controls found Rasmussen didn't >> they? > > No. My bad, I know that. Rasmussen was kicked out due to his phony whereabouts. Doh. --Mike Jacoubowsky Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReaction.com Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA |
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> I would assume that ASO would argue that the good showing of Astana
> proves that they're doping. That's the type of reasoning you're seeing > from the ASO management. >> Well, they were on vacation a week before the start and came there and >> kicked ass..'if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck'. Bruyneel and >> Contador is the problem, Astana has nothing to do with it. Vino was >> never a contender. So the only way to prove you're clean is to lose convincingly? We know 2nd place isn't enough (Zabel in his past life). --Mike Jacoubowsky Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReaction.com Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA "Qui si parla Campagnolo-www.vecchios.com" <peter@vecchios.com> wrote in message news:7f7eee78-e7a6-488a-8eea-b68ff0be3ae1@x19g2000prg.googlegroups.com... On Jun 4, 10:28 am, ilan...@gmail.com wrote: > On Jun 4, 7:56 am, hizark21 <hizar...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > ASO still refusing to admit Astana in TDF (http://www.cyclingnews.com/ > > news.php?id=news/2008/jun08/jun04news ). > > > It's simply ridiculous that the ASO is refusing to let Astana enter > > the TDF. The ASO should have put forth a set of condtions for Astana > > to meet if they wished to enter the TDF. Astana is the dominant spring > > team now and they deserve to ride in the TDF. > > I would assume that ASO would argue that the good showing of Astana > proves that they're doping. That's the type of reasoning you're seeing > from the ASO management. Well, they were on vacation a week before the start and came there and kicked ass..'if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck'. Bruyneel and Contador is the problem, Astana has nothing to do with it. Vino was never a contender. > > Any argument about Astana ticking ASO off is specious, as Astana has > the right to participate, as a pro tour team. Even before the Pro > Tour, the top 15 rated teams were guaranteed a spot in the Tour de > France. Just another reason why the UCI is a necessary evil. > > -ilan |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"hizark21" <hizark21@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6f1c0d23-0904-4a9d-8084-efea49fe1f1c@x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com... > ASO still refusing to admit Astana in TDF (http://www.cyclingnews.com/ > news.php?id=news/2008/jun08/jun04news ). > > It's simply ridiculous that the ASO is refusing to let Astana enter > the TDF. The ASO should have put forth a set of condtions for Astana > to meet if they wished to enter the TDF. Astana is the dominant spring > team now and they deserve to ride in the TDF. The Tour de France this year is one of the "Asterisk" races where the winner will only be the winner because his real competition isn't there. |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 4, 2:14 pm, "Qui si parla Campagnolo-www.vecchios.com"
<pe...@vecchios.com> wrote: ... > Bruyneel and Contador is the problem, Astana has nothing to do with it. ' Do you mean Bruyneel and Contador together are the problem, or each individually are problems? ASO says Contador by himself is not a problem: http://velonews.com/article/77008/c...eep-with-vuelta “We have nothing against Contador, but rather against the team’s repeated errors,” Tour director Christian Prudhomme told the Spanish wire service, EFE. “If Astana doesn’t have any problems in 2008, we would take a different decision for the next edition of the Tour de France.” |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <ujx1k.680$L_.1@flpi150.ffdc.sbc.com>,
Bob Schwartz <bob.schwartz@REMOVEsbcglobal.net> wrote: > John Forrest Tomlinson wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:56:58 -0700 (PDT), hizark21 <hizark21@yahoo.com> > > wrote: > > > >> ASO still refusing to admit Astana in TDF (http://www.cyclingnews.com/ > >> news.php?id=news/2008/jun08/jun04news ). > >> > >> It's simply ridiculous that the ASO is refusing to let Astana enter > >> the TDF. The ASO should have put forth a set of condtions for Astana > >> to meet if they wished to enter the TDF. Astana is the dominant spring > >> team now and they deserve to ride in the TDF. > > > > I'm not saying I agree with ASO's decisions, but you don't get it. > > They told Astana they'll let them in after a year with no scandals. > > It's clear. Astana could sweep the top ten in every race they get > > into, and that wouldn't help then get into the Tour of France. In > > fact, it would probably hurt. > > Indeed. Astana has pissed in the Tour's soup twice now. > They've earned this. ASO looks like the bad guy now. They could invite Astana. The team they replace could be recompensed. Astana is hurt by their exclusion: no exposure in the most widely seen bicycle race. Astana takes the Vuelta. -- Michael Press |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Michael Press wrote:
> In article <ujx1k.680$L_.1@flpi150.ffdc.sbc.com>, > Bob Schwartz <bob.schwartz@REMOVEsbcglobal.net> wrote: > >> John Forrest Tomlinson wrote: >>> On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:56:58 -0700 (PDT), hizark21 <hizark21@yahoo.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> ASO still refusing to admit Astana in TDF (http://www.cyclingnews.com/ >>>> news.php?id=news/2008/jun08/jun04news ). >>>> >>>> It's simply ridiculous that the ASO is refusing to let Astana enter >>>> the TDF. The ASO should have put forth a set of condtions for Astana >>>> to meet if they wished to enter the TDF. Astana is the dominant spring >>>> team now and they deserve to ride in the TDF. >>> I'm not saying I agree with ASO's decisions, but you don't get it. >>> They told Astana they'll let them in after a year with no scandals. >>> It's clear. Astana could sweep the top ten in every race they get >>> into, and that wouldn't help then get into the Tour of France. In >>> fact, it would probably hurt. >> Indeed. Astana has pissed in the Tour's soup twice now. >> They've earned this. > > ASO looks like the bad guy now. > They could invite Astana. The team > they replace could be recompensed. > Astana is hurt by their exclusion: > no exposure in the most widely seen > bicycle race. Astana takes the Vuelta. > On the other hand, I suspect that one of the top stories during the TdF will be the exclusion of Astana. That's still exposure. Heck, if I were JB and ASO invited Astana at this point, I'd say "no thanks, we only race the really competitive tours". /dave a |
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"dave a" <blkcatREMOVETHIS@gmail.com> wrote in message news:g27a4402m0k@news3.newsguy.com... >> >> ASO looks like the bad guy now. They could invite Astana. The team >> they replace could be recompensed. >> Astana is hurt by their exclusion: no exposure in the most widely seen >> bicycle race. Astana takes the Vuelta. >> > > On the other hand, I suspect that one of the top stories during the TdF > will be the exclusion of Astana. That's still exposure. > It's exposure, but it's minimal and it's not visual. If that type of exposure was significantly beneficial, Unibet would still be around this season as a sponsor. |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
news:nvGdnZ6ty9pZhNrVnZ2dnUVZ_tninZ2d@earthlink.com... > "hizark21" <hizark21@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:6f1c0d23-0904-4a9d-8084-efea49fe1f1c@x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com... >> ASO still refusing to admit Astana in TDF (http://www.cyclingnews.com/ >> news.php?id=news/2008/jun08/jun04news ). >> >> It's simply ridiculous that the ASO is refusing to let Astana enter >> the TDF. The ASO should have put forth a set of condtions for Astana >> to meet if they wished to enter the TDF. Astana is the dominant spring >> team now and they deserve to ride in the TDF. > > The Tour de France this year is one of the "Asterisk" races where the > winner will only be the winner because his real competition isn't there. For that to happen it would take a guy like Cadel Evans to that he won't be racing the TdF this year because, given the reduced stature of the event without last year's winner, he would be better off sitting it out and targeting the Olympic road race instead. I don't think that's likely to happen. --Mike Jacoubowsky Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReaction.com Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA |
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Carl Sundquist wrote:
> > "dave a" <blkcatREMOVETHIS@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:g27a4402m0k@news3.newsguy.com... >>> >>> ASO looks like the bad guy now. They could invite Astana. The team >>> they replace could be recompensed. >>> Astana is hurt by their exclusion: no exposure in the most widely >>> seen bicycle race. Astana takes the Vuelta. >>> >> >> On the other hand, I suspect that one of the top stories during the >> TdF will be the exclusion of Astana. That's still exposure. >> > > It's exposure, but it's minimal and it's not visual. If that type of > exposure was significantly beneficial, Unibet would still be around this > season as a sponsor. Unibet didn't win the Giro last year... /dave a |
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"dave a" <blkcatREMOVETHIS@gmail.com> wrote in message news:g27bmk01rq8@news5.newsguy.com... > Carl Sundquist wrote: >> >> "dave a" <blkcatREMOVETHIS@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:g27a4402m0k@news3.newsguy.com... >>>> >>>> ASO looks like the bad guy now. They could invite Astana. The team >>>> they replace could be recompensed. >>>> Astana is hurt by their exclusion: no exposure in the most widely seen >>>> bicycle race. Astana takes the Vuelta. >>>> >>> >>> On the other hand, I suspect that one of the top stories during the TdF >>> will be the exclusion of Astana. That's still exposure. >>> >> >> It's exposure, but it's minimal and it's not visual. If that type of >> exposure was significantly beneficial, Unibet would still be around this >> season as a sponsor. > > Unibet didn't win the Giro last year... > > /dave a You're right. How big was the Basso story last year during the Tour? Did it sustain itself as a top story for all three weeks? |
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
> And yet some believe that was possibly the cleanest Giro in a very long > time, specifically because Astana was there, which put everything under a > microscope. Every year someone explains why cycling is finally clean. Every year. Don't get me wrong, that's a good thing. Being stridently wrong about this is what finally embarrassed Lafferty onto leaving. |
|