![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> A Muzi wrote:
>> Since she just left here on a new Bianchi Volpe with Michelin 700-28 >> it seems to have worked out OK. SMS wrote: > Good choice. I see that Trek finally corrected the crankset problem on > the 520 after so many years. For 2008 it's 50/39/30, for 2007 it was > 52/42/30. The Volpe is 28/38/48T, which is better for loaded touring, > though I really like the 48-36-26t on the Surly LHT. > I notice that the Volpe doesn't have the front low-rider rack braze-ons. > Too bad. Many feel that a banded upper lowrider mount is preferable to a hole in the fork blade. That's more a quibble than a crisis on an otherwise exceptional touring bike. p.s. a subset of Volpe owners ask for 53t outers despite 48x11 = 118 inches! -- Andrew Muzi <www.yellowjersey.org/> Open every day since 1 April, 1971 ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
|