![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
From: tkeats2005@hotmail.com (Tom*Keats)
Actually, the 70s gave a lot of folks in Vancouver the kickstart they needed to take up practical cycling. Yes, some fell by the wayside. In fact that's how I accumulated my fleet of Apollos -- people bought 'em, decided they didn't like riding, and gave/traded/sold 'em cheaply to me. But many of my fellow citizens carried on, and continue to this day to ride both recreationally and practically. I daresay we have a thriving bicycling culture here which is due in large part to the Energy Crisis. Even more so in Victoria, B.C. The seventies' so-called Energy Crisis was just a temporary glitch. I sense we're now on the brink of something much more serious. Biofuel to the rescue! * * (... maybe.) Maybe biofuel could be made edible, or at least potable. It could be advertised as "Good For Man or Machine or Beast." I could make good use of a decent fractionating column, myself. Not for vehicle operation, though. I've noticed lately how publicly-available bike racks are getting a lot more use. We need more of 'em. Sheltered bike parking areas would be nice. At any rate, I figure a lot of people are gonna learn the hard way, the difference between "/can't/ adapt" and "don't wanna adapt." cheers, ********Tom - - - - - - - - - - - - You're from Canada? you don't count then. My statement was in referance to us slothful Americans :-3D - - Compliments of: "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman" If you want to E-mail me use: ChrisZCorner "at" webtv "dot" net My website: http://geocities.com/czcorner |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It's Chris wrote:
> Maybe biofuel could be made edible, or at least potable. I have a friend with a converted diesel Mercedes that can run on bio-fuel, but that also runs on pure vegetable oil (you must start and stop the engine while it's getting fuel from the bio-fuel tank, but once the engine is running it can be switched to the plain vegetable oil tank). |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Tom Keats" <tkeats2005@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:423r1g.qa.ln@vcn.bc.ca... > Hear, hear! > > And I figure the best way of delivering the message that > Practical Bicycling can indeed be viable is by, well, > simply doing it -- by simply being an example to others. > > I think it helps to dress in normal workaday clothes > which look nice but are also cycling-friendly. Tom's right. I hop on my town bike with the fenders and the chain guard and the step through frame in my white skirt and sandals and pedal off to join friends downtown for lunch. And sure enough, I glide right up to the restaurant and snap down the kick stand, pull the key out of the ring lock and take my purse out of the basket and am ready to go, while they tell me how much trouble they had finding parking. Heck, turns out that we left at the same time to go the same distance, but I saved all that time parking. We don't even have to get into the cost of gas discussion before they want a bike just like mine, down to the bell. |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Keats wrote:
> My only beef is that with our local MHL, I fear helmets > portray cycling as dangerous, and scares incipient riders > off. Helmet laws can have the opposite effect as well. In my area, which is heavily Asian, there is an unexpectedly large number of school-age kids riding to school. The schools thought, apparently, that the parents would be too overprotective to allow their kids to ride to school, but the helmet requirement helps to give the parents a false sense of security, for better or for worse. The kids ride horribly, on the wrong side of the road, on the sidewalk, darting out from between parked cars, running stop signs and red lights, but the parents are seemingly unconcerned because the kids wear helmets. I think you're falling for the fallacies promoted by the AHZs, by stating that widespread helmet usage makes others thinks that cycling is more dangerous than it actually is. Seat belt laws don't portray driving as more dangerous than it actually is. No one believes that seat belts will save your life in a really bad accident, yet everyone accepts that wearing them can reduce injuries in some situations, even if they don't like wearing them. |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Pat wrote:
>> And I figure the best way of delivering the message that >> Practical Bicycling can indeed be viable is by, well, >> simply doing it -- by simply being an example to others. > > Well, I know I spend a lot of time explaining my Bike Friday to people every > time I ride it. I recently went on the Amtrak and when people saw me > unfolding it in the parking lot and then the reverse when I returned, I had > a crowd around me. Sheesh! I don't mind telling people about it, but I > have noticed a lot more interest recently. > > Pat in TX The really cool & small folders, like the Brompton and the Bike Friday Tikit seem to draw a crowd more than the 20" folders that are still rather cumbersome to take onto a commute train or bus. I thought that BF is supposed to supply you with brochures to give out to interested people. Contact Lynette Chiang. "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8m8BBgHNcs" |
|