![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
John Tserkezis wrote:
> clare at snyder dot ontario dot canada wrote: > > So what? It's a given that I sweat, and if I don't, that means I've > been sitting on my arse in front of the television. Heck, I routinely > sweat walking. THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH SWEATING. > Sheeze, we're not women. And that statement doesn't ever work. All > the women I know who cycle are more capable and prepared than many guys > I know, and are quite happy to do respectable distances without crying > over it either. > The problem here is a lack of perspective--that the idea of riding a motorized bicycle may be less of the purpose of getting exercise, and more of the purpose of getting somewhere cheaper or easier (or even -/funner/-) than by using other larger forms of transportation. Where I live, the terrain is mostly flat and the power limitations of registered mopeds and motorized bicycles are the same, but the bicycles have no registration or licensing requirements. ....The reliability of bicycle engines is probably still not quite up to what a cheap moped can manage, but then, most bicycle engine setups allow you to pedal the bicycle normally should you ever need to. If the engine on a moped fails, you're walking home--just like with a motorcycle. ~ |
|