War on Terror deaths Vs other War

SLAVE of THE STATE

On May 31, 12:15*pm, Donald Munro <fat-dumb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
>
> > Regarding Starbucks, I don't so much care if you bring a 2x4, but it would
> > be nice if you brought Gaggioli's wife for some lattes.
> >http://www.pbase.com/sdukes/lynn_gaggioli
>
> People dressed in purple standing in a puddle rarely make much impression
> when hitting on a hot chick.

Would a hot chick be impressed when she sees Mom's basement?

SLAVE of THE STATE

On Jun 1, 12:24*pm, r15...@aol.com wrote:
> On May 31, 5:46 pm, Ted van de Weteringe
>
> <myfulln...@xs4all.nl.invalid> wrote:
> > Paul G. wrote:
> > > I think Gen. Patton said it best:
> > > "No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by
> > > making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."
>
> > > Patton knew what "the correct amount of deaths" was.
>
> > Less than the other side's?
>
> The correct amount of deaths is enough. Plus a few hundred thousand
> extra burned to death for PR purposes.

Could you please put that into the form of a question?

Donald Munro

r15757 wrote:
>> The correct amount of deaths is enough. Plus a few hundred thousand
>> extra burned to death for PR purposes.

SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
> Could you please put that into the form of a question?

Are we having an rbr episode of Jeopardy ?

Donald Munro

Donald Munro wrote:
>> People dressed in purple standing in a puddle rarely make much
>> impression when hitting on a hot chick.

SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
> Would a hot chick be impressed when she sees Mom's basement?

Only if you have an altitude tent over the bed.

Paul G.

On Jun 3, 8:07 am, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article
> <c1da95a9-c1b9-4130-ac2a-1ba99774b...@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
> "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 2, 1:59 pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> > > Big Dumb Paul,
>
> > > You didn't understand the "question."
>
> > I have to admit, my grasp of gibberish isn't all that great, and
> > Google doesn't have a Gibberish-to-English translator, so you could be
> > right. Maybe you could translate it for me. Ah yes, here it is again,
> > such as it is: "What is the correct amount of deaths for a war and/or
> > by guvmint?"
>
> > Just curious- do you live in a trailer behind your folk's house?
>
> Dang, Paul. You expect that to sting?
> What do you think is happening here?
>
> --
> Michael Press
>
> P. S. Like, you know, in the NASCAR thread? You were totally played.

Dang, Michael. You expect that to sting? What do YOU think is
happening here? (to answer your question, I suspect it's like
Rashomon. I'm guessing you won't answer mine.)

I thoroughly enjoyed the NASCAR thread, which I why I stuck around. I
don't mind a little humor at my own expense, I can afford it.
Besides, Danika Patrick won an indycar race in April, which
essentially proved my point. It's just a matter of time until a woman
wins a NASCAR race.
-Paul

Kurgan Gringioni

On Jun 3, 9:58*am, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
> On Jun 3, 8:07 am, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > <c1da95a9-c1b9-4130-ac2a-1ba99774b...@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
> > *"Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 2, 1:59 pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> > > > Big Dumb Paul,
>
> > > > You didn't understand the "question."
>
> > > I have to admit, my grasp of gibberish isn't all that great, and
> > > Google doesn't have a Gibberish-to-English translator, so you could be
> > > right. Maybe you could translate it for me. Ah yes, here it is again,
> > > such as it is: "What is the correct amount of deaths for a war and/or
> > > by guvmint?"
>
> > > Just curious- do you live in a trailer behind your folk's house?
>
> > Dang, Paul. You expect that to sting?
> > What do you think is happening here?
>
> > --
> > Michael Press
>
> > P. S. Like, you know, in the NASCAR thread? You were totally played.
>
> Dang, Michael. You expect that to sting? *What do YOU think is
> happening here? (to answer your question, I suspect it's like
> Rashomon. I'm guessing you won't answer mine.)
>
> I thoroughly enjoyed the NASCAR thread, which I why I stuck around. *I
> don't mind a little humor at my own expense, I can afford it.
> Besides, Danika Patrick won an indycar race in April, which
> essentially proved my point. *It's just a matter of time until a woman
> wins a NASCAR race.



Dumbass -


How long will it be before the good 'ol boys of NASCAR allow a woman
to participate in a race?

In open wheel, Janet Guthrie participated in the Indanapolis 500 in
1977. Here it is, 31 years later and NASCAR still hasn't had a female
participant.


thanks,

K. Gringioni.

Paul G.

On Jun 3, 8:07 am, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article
> <c1da95a9-c1b9-4130-ac2a-1ba99774b...@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
> "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 2, 1:59 pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> > > Big Dumb Paul,
>
> > > You didn't understand the "question."
>
> > I have to admit, my grasp of gibberish isn't all that great, and
> > Google doesn't have a Gibberish-to-English translator, so you could be
> > right. Maybe you could translate it for me. Ah yes, here it is again,
> > such as it is: "What is the correct amount of deaths for a war and/or
> > by guvmint?"
>
> > Just curious- do you live in a trailer behind your folk's house?
>
> Dang, Paul. You expect that to sting?
> What do you think is happening here?

On second thought, why are you even responding to this post? Just
curious- do you live in a trailer behind your folk's house? That
could explain a lot.
-Paul

Paul G.

On Jun 3, 2:05 pm, Kurgan Gringioni <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 3, 9:58 am, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 3, 8:07 am, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> > > In article
> > > <c1da95a9-c1b9-4130-ac2a-1ba99774b...@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
> > > "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 2, 1:59 pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> > > > > Big Dumb Paul,
>
> > > > > You didn't understand the "question."
>
> > > > I have to admit, my grasp of gibberish isn't all that great, and
> > > > Google doesn't have a Gibberish-to-English translator, so you could be
> > > > right. Maybe you could translate it for me. Ah yes, here it is again,
> > > > such as it is: "What is the correct amount of deaths for a war and/or
> > > > by guvmint?"
>
> > > > Just curious- do you live in a trailer behind your folk's house?
>
> > > Dang, Paul. You expect that to sting?
> > > What do you think is happening here?
>
> > > --
> > > Michael Press
>
> > > P. S. Like, you know, in the NASCAR thread? You were totally played.
>
> > Dang, Michael. You expect that to sting? What do YOU think is
> > happening here? (to answer your question, I suspect it's like
> > Rashomon. I'm guessing you won't answer mine.)
>
> > I thoroughly enjoyed the NASCAR thread, which I why I stuck around. I
> > don't mind a little humor at my own expense, I can afford it.
> > Besides, Danika Patrick won an indycar race in April, which
> > essentially proved my point. It's just a matter of time until a woman
> > wins a NASCAR race.
>
> Dumbass -
>
> How long will it be before the good 'ol boys of NASCAR allow a woman
> to participate in a race?
>
> In open wheel, Janet Guthrie participated in the Indanapolis 500 in
> 1977. Here it is, 31 years later and NASCAR still hasn't had a female
> participant.
>
> thanks,
>
> K. Gringioni.

Interesting. I didn't know that, but I do know that nothing NASCAR
drivers do requires balls. Ovaries will do nicely.
On the other hand, a woman will never win a stage in the TDF, because
as we all know, very few men have the strength and endurance to do
that.
-Paul

Michael Press

In article
<d647b43b-a5fb-439f-a0e4-924b66e062aa@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
"Paul G." <carbide@egine.com> wrote:

> On Jun 3, 8:07 am, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > In article
> > <c1da95a9-c1b9-4130-ac2a-1ba99774b...@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Jun 2, 1:59 pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> > > > Big Dumb Paul,
> >
> > > > You didn't understand the "question."
> >
> > > I have to admit, my grasp of gibberish isn't all that great, and
> > > Google doesn't have a Gibberish-to-English translator, so you could be
> > > right. Maybe you could translate it for me. Ah yes, here it is again,
> > > such as it is: "What is the correct amount of deaths for a war and/or
> > > by guvmint?"
> >
> > > Just curious- do you live in a trailer behind your folk's house?
> >
> > Dang, Paul. You expect that to sting?
> > What do you think is happening here?
> >
> > P. S. Like, you know, in the NASCAR thread? You were totally played.
>
> Dang, Michael. You expect that to sting?

I expect you to deny it.

> What do YOU think is
> happening here? (to answer your question, I suspect it's like
> Rashomon. I'm guessing you won't answer mine.)

You did not answer. `Trailer behind the folks'?
You learned all this where? Internet Abuse 101?
Where does it teach you to repeat a crack with no spin?

> I thoroughly enjoyed the NASCAR thread, which I why I stuck around. I
> don't mind a little humor at my own expense, I can afford it.
> Besides, Danika Patrick won an indycar race in April, which
> essentially proved my point. It's just a matter of time until a woman
> wins a NASCAR race.

Denial.

--
Michael Press

Michael Press

In article
<38deaee0-82c3-46c5-8063-a2011361aa30@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
"Paul G." <carbide@egine.com> wrote:

> On Jun 3, 8:07 am, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > In article
> > <c1da95a9-c1b9-4130-ac2a-1ba99774b...@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Jun 2, 1:59 pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> > > > Big Dumb Paul,
> >
> > > > You didn't understand the "question."
> >
> > > I have to admit, my grasp of gibberish isn't all that great, and
> > > Google doesn't have a Gibberish-to-English translator, so you could be
> > > right. Maybe you could translate it for me. Ah yes, here it is again,
> > > such as it is: "What is the correct amount of deaths for a war and/or
> > > by guvmint?"
> >
> > > Just curious- do you live in a trailer behind your folk's house?
> >
> > Dang, Paul. You expect that to sting?
> > What do you think is happening here?
>
> On second thought, why are you even responding to this post? Just
> curious- do you live in a trailer behind your folk's house? That
> could explain a lot.

<http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/msg/8bd3cbd872a494fa?dmode=source>

--
Michael Press

Paul G.

On Jun 3, 5:21 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article
> <38deaee0-82c3-46c5-8063-a2011361a...@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 3, 8:07 am, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <c1da95a9-c1b9-4130-ac2a-1ba99774b...@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
> > > "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 2, 1:59 pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> > > > > Big Dumb Paul,
>
> > > > > You didn't understand the "question."
>
> > > > I have to admit, my grasp of gibberish isn't all that great, and
> > > > Google doesn't have a Gibberish-to-English translator, so you could be
> > > > right. Maybe you could translate it for me. Ah yes, here it is again,
> > > > such as it is: "What is the correct amount of deaths for a war and/or
> > > > by guvmint?"
>
> > > > Just curious- do you live in a trailer behind your folk's house?
>
> > > Dang, Paul. You expect that to sting?
> > > What do you think is happening here?
>
> > On second thought, why are you even responding to this post? Just
> > curious- do you live in a trailer behind your folk's house? That
> > could explain a lot.
>
> <http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/msg/8bd3cbd872a494...>
>
> --
> Michael Press

Ah. Here I was going to give you debasement, but you've already got
it. Saved me the trouble.
-Paul

Paul G.

On Jun 3, 5:11 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article
> <d647b43b-a5fb-439f-a0e4-924b66e06...@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
> "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 3, 8:07 am, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <c1da95a9-c1b9-4130-ac2a-1ba99774b...@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
> > > "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 2, 1:59 pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> > > > > Big Dumb Paul,
>
> > > > > You didn't understand the "question."
>
> > > > I have to admit, my grasp of gibberish isn't all that great, and
> > > > Google doesn't have a Gibberish-to-English translator, so you could be
> > > > right. Maybe you could translate it for me. Ah yes, here it is again,
> > > > such as it is: "What is the correct amount of deaths for a war and/or
> > > > by guvmint?"
>
> > > > Just curious- do you live in a trailer behind your folk's house?
>
> > > Dang, Paul. You expect that to sting?
> > > What do you think is happening here?
>
> > > P. S. Like, you know, in the NASCAR thread? You were totally played.
>
> > Dang, Michael. You expect that to sting?
>
> I expect you to deny it.
>
> > What do YOU think is
> > happening here? (to answer your question, I suspect it's like
> > Rashomon. I'm guessing you won't answer mine.)
>
> You did not answer. `Trailer behind the folks'?
> You learned all this where? Internet Abuse 101?
> Where does it teach you to repeat a crack with no spin?
>
> > I thoroughly enjoyed the NASCAR thread, which I why I stuck around. I
> > don't mind a little humor at my own expense, I can afford it.
> > Besides, Danika Patrick won an indycar race in April, which
> > essentially proved my point. It's just a matter of time until a woman
> > wins a NASCAR race.
>
> Denial.
>
> --
> Michael Press

Apparently you're not a Kurosawa fan. I don't really know what to say
about your little psycho outburst there, but maybe a limerick will
come to me.
-Paul

Howard Kveck

In article <a4f6644e-e8d9-422d-a115-cc36d0b87280@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
"Paul G." <carbide@egine.com> wrote:

> On Jun 3, 2:05 pm, Kurgan Gringioni <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > How long will it be before the good 'ol boys of NASCAR allow a woman
> > to participate in a race?
> >
> > In open wheel, Janet Guthrie participated in the Indanapolis 500 in
> > 1977. Here it is, 31 years later and NASCAR still hasn't had a female
> > participant.

> Interesting. I didn't know that, but I do know that nothing NASCAR
> drivers do requires balls. Ovaries will do nicely.

http://ca.geocities.com/womeninnascar/

Women in NASCAR have been few and far between but they have been there. KG
mentioned Guthrie as an Indy car driver but forgot about the NASCAR racing she did.

--
tanx,
Howard

Whatever happened to
Leon Trotsky?
He got an icepick
That made his ears burn.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Paul G.

On Jun 3, 10:36 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> In article <a4f6644e-e8d9-422d-a115-cc36d0b87...@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
> "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 3, 2:05 pm, Kurgan Gringioni <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > How long will it be before the good 'ol boys of NASCAR allow a woman
> > > to participate in a race?
>
> > > In open wheel, Janet Guthrie participated in the Indanapolis 500 in
> > > 1977. Here it is, 31 years later and NASCAR still hasn't had a female
> > > participant.
> > Interesting. I didn't know that, but I do know that nothing NASCAR
> > drivers do requires balls. Ovaries will do nicely.
>
> http://ca.geocities.com/womeninnascar/
>
> Women in NASCAR have been few and far between but they have been there. KG
> mentioned Guthrie as an Indy car driver but forgot about the NASCAR racing she did.
>

Damn. One day I learn there's never been a woman NASCAR driver, the
next I learn there's been 14, including a top 5 finisher. Thanks for
the correction, it's always better to know the truth.
-Paul