Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Road Racing > rec.bicycles.racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


War on Terror deaths Vs other War

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 28-05.-2008, 09:31 AM   #1
ST
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default War on Terror deaths Vs other War

http://milind.data360.org/dsg.aspx?...t_Group_Id=1900

1-29-2008


7,500 Clinton Years
3,824 War on Terror

  Reply With Quote
Old 28-05.-2008, 12:45 PM   #2
Earl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: War on Terror deaths Vs other War

ST wrote:
> http://milind.data360.org/dsg.aspx?...t_Group_Id=1900
>
> 1-29-2008
>
>
> 7,500 Clinton Years
> 3,824 War on Terror
>


You looked at that chart and found it worthy of posting? Guess that
would explain our current state.

Total active military deaths from 1981-1988
(Reagan) 17201 (avg 2150 per year). 58 from hostile action.
That's 0.33%.

Total active military deaths from 1989-1992
(Bush, Sr.) 6223 (avg 1555 per year). 170 from hostile action.
That's 2.73%.

Total active military deaths from 1993-2000
(Clinton) 7500 (avg 938 per year). 2 from hostile action.
That's a 0.01%.

Total active military deaths from 2001-2004
(Bush, Jr.) 5187 (avg 1296 per year). 1102 from hostile action.
That's a 21.24%.

Or.....
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/deaths.asp
  Reply With Quote
Old 28-05.-2008, 12:59 PM   #3
Howard Kveck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: War on Terror deaths Vs other War

In article <xradnZpiVM5nSKHVnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d@comcast.com>, Earl <earl@nowhere2.com>
wrote:

> ST wrote:
> > http://milind.data360.org/dsg.aspx?...t_Group_Id=1900
> >
> > 1-29-2008
> >
> >
> > 7,500 Clinton Years
> > 3,824 War on Terror
> >

>
> You looked at that chart and found it worthy of posting? Guess that
> would explain our current state.
>
> Total active military deaths from 1981-1988
> (Reagan) 17201 (avg 2150 per year). 58 from hostile action.
> That's 0.33%.
>
> Total active military deaths from 1989-1992
> (Bush, Sr.) 6223 (avg 1555 per year). 170 from hostile action.
> That's 2.73%.
>
> Total active military deaths from 1993-2000
> (Clinton) 7500 (avg 938 per year). 2 from hostile action.
> That's a 0.01%.
>
> Total active military deaths from 2001-2004
> (Bush, Jr.) 5187 (avg 1296 per year). 1102 from hostile action.
> That's a 21.24%.
>
> Or.....
> http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/deaths.asp


ANSWER THE QUESTION ASSBAG!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh, sorry. What I meant to say was "On a related note:
http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9573.html "

--
tanx,
Howard

Whatever happened to
Leon Trotsky?
He got an icepick
That made his ears burn.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
  Reply With Quote
Old 28-05.-2008, 01:09 PM   #4
Fred Fredburger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: War on Terror deaths Vs other War

ST wrote:
> http://milind.data360.org/dsg.aspx?...t_Group_Id=1900
>
> 1-29-2008
>
>
> 7,500 Clinton Years
> 3,824 War on Terror
>

# of CIA agents ratted out by the US administration:

0 Clinton, Bush Sr., Reagan, Carter ... Washington
1 Bush Jr.

More to be proud of!
  Reply With Quote
Old 28-05.-2008, 01:25 PM   #5
Paul G.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: War on Terror deaths Vs other War

On May 27, 8:45 pm, Earl <e...@nowhere2.com> wrote:
> ST wrote:
> >http://milind.data360.org/dsg.aspx?...t_Group_Id=1900

>
> > 1-29-2008

>
> > 7,500 Clinton Years
> > 3,824 War on Terror

>
> You looked at that chart and found it worthy of posting? Guess that
> would explain our current state.
>
> Total active military deaths from 1981-1988
> (Reagan) 17201 (avg 2150 per year). 58 from hostile action.
> That's 0.33%.


Those "hostile action" numbers don't include the 1983 "Marine Barracks
Down" incident in Beirut, which killed 241 American servicemen: 220
Marines, 18 Navy personnel and 3 Army soldiers.

"Cut and Run Reagan" put his tail between his legs and pulled out of
Lebanon after that.
-Paul
  Reply With Quote
Old 28-05.-2008, 02:42 PM   #6
Howard Kveck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: War on Terror deaths Vs other War

In article <33ab61a5-2ab2-4682-be29-3c0c16bcaa46@z24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
"Paul G." <carbide@egine.com> wrote:

> On May 27, 8:45 pm, Earl <e...@nowhere2.com> wrote:
> > ST wrote:
> > >http://milind.data360.org/dsg.aspx?...t_Group_Id=1900

> >
> > > 1-29-2008

> >
> > > 7,500 Clinton Years
> > > 3,824 War on Terror

> >
> > You looked at that chart and found it worthy of posting? Guess that
> > would explain our current state.
> >
> > Total active military deaths from 1981-1988
> > (Reagan) 17201 (avg 2150 per year). 58 from hostile action.
> > That's 0.33%.

>
> Those "hostile action" numbers don't include the 1983 "Marine Barracks
> Down" incident in Beirut, which killed 241 American servicemen: 220
> Marines, 18 Navy personnel and 3 Army soldiers.
>
> "Cut and Run Reagan" put his tail between his legs and pulled out of
> Lebanon after that.


It's always interesting how rightwingers forget that when they scream about
Clinton "cutting and running" in Somalia. Yes, he should have stood up to the
loudmouthed idiots in Congress who were screaming at him to withdraw (that would be
mostly the GOP side of the aisle for those with short memories) because they were the
very ones who criticised him for doing it after.

--
tanx,
Howard

Whatever happened to
Leon Trotsky?
He got an icepick
That made his ears burn.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
  Reply With Quote
Old 28-05.-2008, 09:36 PM   #7
Bill C
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: War on Terror deaths Vs other War

On May 27, 11:45*pm, Earl <e...@nowhere2.com> wrote:
> ST wrote:
> >http://milind.data360.org/dsg.aspx?...t_Group_Id=1900

>
> > 1-29-2008

>
> > * * * 7,500 * * *Clinton Years
> > * * * 3,824 * * *War on Terror

>
> You looked at that chart and found it worthy of posting? Guess that
> would explain our current state.


Again:
http://www.military.com/news/articl...html?ESRC=eb.nl

That chart goes well with the quality of the intelligence this
administration let people have. Totally useless other than as an
attempt at propaganda, and totally useless in that role too, since it
could've been put together by a kindergardener, and offers no useful
information.
Sorta like pointing to the total causalty figures from Vietnam and
then decalringthat it was, obviously, an overwhlming US victory. Has
Bush done that yet too? Would go well with "Mission Accomplished!".
Bill C
  Reply With Quote
Old 28-05.-2008, 11:33 PM   #8
MagillaGorilla
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: War on Terror deaths Vs other War

Earl wrote:

> ST wrote:
>
>> http://milind.data360.org/dsg.aspx?...t_Group_Id=1900
>>
>> 1-29-2008
>>
>>
>> 7,500 Clinton Years
>> 3,824 War on Terror

>
>
> You looked at that chart and found it worthy of posting? Guess that
> would explain our current state.
>
> Total active military deaths from 1981-1988
> (Reagan) 17201 (avg 2150 per year). 58 from hostile action.
> That's 0.33%.
>



How many Marines died in the Beirut attack in '83? Wasn’t it 200+? What
was the cause of the death? Illness, suicide, old age?


Magilla
  Reply With Quote
Old 30-05.-2008, 12:23 AM   #9
dustoyevsky@mac.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: War on Terror deaths Vs other War

On May 27, 11:25*pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
> On May 27, 8:45 pm, Earl <e...@nowhere2.com> wrote:
>
> > ST wrote:
> > >http://milind.data360.org/dsg.aspx?...t_Group_Id=1900

>
> > > 1-29-2008

>
> > > * * * 7,500 * * *Clinton Years
> > > * * * 3,824 * * *War on Terror

>
> > You looked at that chart and found it worthy of posting? Guess that
> > would explain our current state.

>
> > Total active military deaths from 1981-1988
> > (Reagan) 17201 (avg 2150 per year). 58 from hostile action.
> > That's 0.33%.

>
> Those "hostile action" numbers don't include the 1983 "Marine Barracks
> Down" incident in Beirut, which killed 241 American servicemen: 220
> Marines, 18 Navy personnel and 3 Army soldiers.
>
> "Cut and Run Reagan" put his tail between his legs and pulled out of
> Lebanon after that.
> -Paul


Not before exacting some manly revenge against the French:

http://www.nytimes.com/1986/04/15/politics/15REAG.html

--D-y
  Reply With Quote
Old 30-05.-2008, 12:47 AM   #10
Paul G.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: War on Terror deaths Vs other War

On May 29, 8:23 am, "dustoyev...@mac.com" <dustoyev...@mac.com> wrote:
> On May 27, 11:25 pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 27, 8:45 pm, Earl <e...@nowhere2.com> wrote:

>
> > > ST wrote:
> > > >http://milind.data360.org/dsg.aspx?...t_Group_Id=1900

>
> > > > 1-29-2008

>
> > > > 7,500 Clinton Years
> > > > 3,824 War on Terror

>
> > > You looked at that chart and found it worthy of posting? Guess that
> > > would explain our current state.

>
> > > Total active military deaths from 1981-1988
> > > (Reagan) 17201 (avg 2150 per year). 58 from hostile action.
> > > That's 0.33%.

>
> > Those "hostile action" numbers don't include the 1983 "Marine Barracks
> > Down" incident in Beirut, which killed 241 American servicemen: 220
> > Marines, 18 Navy personnel and 3 Army soldiers.

>
> > "Cut and Run Reagan" put his tail between his legs and pulled out of
> > Lebanon after that.
> > -Paul

>
> Not before exacting some manly revenge against the French:
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/1986/04/15/politics/15REAG.html
>
> --D-y


Cut-and-Run Reagan has some interesting quotes in that article on his
April 14, 1986 attack on Libya:

"I warned that there should be no place on earth where terrorists can
rest and train and practice their deadly skills,'' he said. ''I meant
it. I said that we should act with others, if possible, and alone, if
necessary, to insure that terrorists have no sanctuary anywhere.
''Tonight we have,'' he said. Mr. Reagan and his ranking aides
delivered an unmistakable warning to Colonel Qaddafi. ''When our
citizens are abused or attacked anywhere in the world, we will respond
in self-defense,'' Mr. Reagan said. ''If necessary, we will do it
again.''

Then the Libyans blew up Pan Am Flight 103 on December 21 1988 over
Lockerbie, Scotland, killing 270 people including 180 Americans.

Reagan never did a damn thing about that. So much for ''If
necessary, we will do it again.''
-Paul
  Reply With Quote
Old 30-05.-2008, 09:23 AM   #11
Howard Kveck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: War on Terror deaths Vs other War

In article <xradnZpiVM5nSKHVnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d@comcast.com>, Earl <earl@nowhere2.com>
wrote:

> ST wrote:
> > http://milind.data360.org/dsg.aspx?...t_Group_Id=1900
> >
> > 1-29-2008
> >
> >
> > 7,500 Clinton Years
> > 3,824 War on Terror
> >

>
> You looked at that chart and found it worthy of posting? Guess that
> would explain our current state.
>
> Total active military deaths from 1981-1988
> (Reagan) 17201 (avg 2150 per year). 58 from hostile action.
> That's 0.33%.
>
> Total active military deaths from 1989-1992
> (Bush, Sr.) 6223 (avg 1555 per year). 170 from hostile action.
> That's 2.73%.
>
> Total active military deaths from 1993-2000
> (Clinton) 7500 (avg 938 per year). 2 from hostile action.
> That's a 0.01%.
>
> Total active military deaths from 2001-2004
> (Bush, Jr.) 5187 (avg 1296 per year). 1102 from hostile action.
> That's a 21.24%.
>
> Or.....
> http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/deaths.asp


Just thinking about this a bit more: I think that we should also include the
contractors (aka mercenaries) who've died in Iraq, as well as the regular civilian
contractors. Also the 2,974 casualties on 9-11. And why not include the Afghani and
Iraqi civilian deaths?

Every time someone like SD Stevie tries to point out how much worse things were
under the Clinton admin., it seems to backfire. Fancy that.

--
tanx,
Howard

Whatever happened to
Leon Trotsky?
He got an icepick
That made his ears burn.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
  Reply With Quote
Old 30-05.-2008, 09:36 AM   #12
Paul G.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: War on Terror deaths Vs other War

On May 29, 5:23 pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> In article <xradnZpiVM5nSKHVnZ2dnUVZ_hWdn...@comcast.com>, Earl <e...@nowhere2.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > ST wrote:
> > >http://milind.data360.org/dsg.aspx?...t_Group_Id=1900

>
> > > 1-29-2008

>
> > > 7,500 Clinton Years
> > > 3,824 War on Terror

>
> > You looked at that chart and found it worthy of posting? Guess that
> > would explain our current state.

>
> > Total active military deaths from 1981-1988
> > (Reagan) 17201 (avg 2150 per year). 58 from hostile action.
> > That's 0.33%.

>
> > Total active military deaths from 1989-1992
> > (Bush, Sr.) 6223 (avg 1555 per year). 170 from hostile action.
> > That's 2.73%.

>
> > Total active military deaths from 1993-2000
> > (Clinton) 7500 (avg 938 per year). 2 from hostile action.
> > That's a 0.01%.

>
> > Total active military deaths from 2001-2004
> > (Bush, Jr.) 5187 (avg 1296 per year). 1102 from hostile action.
> > That's a 21.24%.

>
> > Or.....
> >http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/deaths.asp

>
> Just thinking about this a bit more: I think that we should also include the
> contractors (aka mercenaries) who've died in Iraq, as well as the regular civilian
> contractors. Also the 2,974 casualties on 9-11. And why not include the Afghani and
> Iraqi civilian deaths?
>
> Every time someone like SD Stevie tries to point out how much worse things were
> under the Clinton admin., it seems to backfire. Fancy that.


Ah, the Clinton years... I remember them fondly. $1.35/gal for gas,
oral sex, unprecedented prosperity, balanced budgets, and- did I
mention the oral sex? Those were the good old days. I say bring 'em
back. This whole "death and destruction" Bush shtick is depressing.
-Paul
  Reply With Quote
Old 30-05.-2008, 11:20 AM   #13
SLAVE of THE STATE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: War on Terror deaths Vs other War

On May 29, 7:23*pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:


> * *Every time someone like SD Stevie tries to point out how much worsethings were
> under the Clinton admin., it seems to backfire. Fancy that.



What is the correct amount of deaths for a war and/or by guvmint?



  Reply With Quote
Old 30-05.-2008, 03:23 PM   #14
Paul G.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: War on Terror deaths Vs other War

On May 29, 7:20 pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
>
> What is the correct amount of deaths for a war and/or by guvmint?


I'll have to start calling you "WARD OF THE STATE". Only a retard
would ask a question like that.
-Paul

  Reply With Quote
Old 30-05.-2008, 05:13 PM   #15
Donald Munro
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: War on Terror deaths Vs other War

Paul G. wrote:
> Ah, the Clinton years... I remember them fondly. $1.35/gal for gas, oral
> sex, unprecedented prosperity, balanced budgets, and- did I mention the
> oral sex?


The nutsack shaving thing must be a throwback to those years.

  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:01 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com