![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#76 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 30, 6:16 am, Bill C <tritonri...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On May 29, 11:25 am, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 29, 5:45 am, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com> > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 29 May 2008 05:34:27 -0700 (PDT), Bill C > > > > <tritonri...@verizon.net> wrote: > > > >JT we agree that the system here has problems. If that was Moore's > > > >whole argument I'd support it wholeheartedly. It's not. The US was > > > >built to be a capitalist country, our founding folks were VERY > > > >concious of that. Profit is NOT evil, > > > > You just don't get it. You're responding to a right-wing parody of > > > what Moore says. > > > > Add "socialist medecine" to the bogeymen they play you with. > > > The funny thing about socialized cradle-to-grave medical care- that's > > what our troops get, and it's a major factor in reenlistments. If they > > leave, they lose that socialized medical care their families have been > > getting. > > > I was truly a SLAVE OF THE STATE for 4 years, living in govt housing, > > sleeping under a govt blanket, eating govt food, spending a puny govt > > paycheck. I had to do what I was told, had no freedom of speech, etc. > > We were supposed to be fighting communism. But wait... we WERE > > communists. > > > -Paul > > Wanna give us some dates for that service?... we > know the system inside out, and BOTH of us would take civilian > healthcare every day of the week, under those evil insurance > companies, anytime. Early to mid 70's. As I like to say, I was on active duty while Bush was AWOL. I have no complaints about my medical care, though the only time I needed it was when I broke my collarbone in a bike crash. My dental care was state-of-the-art, really excellent. You sound like someone with a lot of medical problems. The insurance companies don't want people like you and will find a way to get rid of you. -Paul |
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 30, 11:18*am, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
> The insurance companies don't want people > like you and will find a way to get rid of > you. They just want customers that don't need or want insurance. Dumbass, Hi -- how is your day going? I'm in Austin this week and won't be able to kick your ass at Starbucks. I went drinking and chasing with Lance and after we put the bouncer in his place, Lance told me RBR has a lot of morons and you're the biggest one -- worse than Lafferty. Thanks, SoTS |
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
> Hi -- how is your day going? I'm in Austin this week and won't be able to > kick your ass at Starbucks. I went drinking and chasing with Lance and > after we put the bouncer in his place, Lance told me RBR has a lot of > morons and you're the biggest one -- worse than Lafferty. Did you buy any Mellow Johnny chamois cream ? |
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 30, 11:44 am, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> On May 30, 11:18 am, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > > > The insurance companies don't want people > > like you and will find a way to get rid of > > you. > > They just want customers that don't need or want insurance. > > Dumbass, > > Hi -- how is your day going? I'm in Austin this week and won't be > able to kick your ass at Starbucks. I went drinking and chasing with > Lance and after we put the bouncer in his place, Lance told me RBR has > a lot of morons and you're the biggest one -- worse than Lafferty. > > Thanks, > SoTS Austin? If you see my old buddy Val "Texas Chainwheel Massacre" Hargrove, tell him I said hi. We got started in bike racing when we were in training at Keesler AFB. He went on to fame and glory. About the ass kicking thing- Let's just say that I was always the biggest guy in the peloton. You can ask Val. Back then I was "lean and mean". Now I'm "mean and mean." Since you fit in a clown car, I doubt you can kick high enough to reach my ass. Maybe you could bite my ankle. Regarding the moron thing- aw, you poor li'l right winger. Did I hurt your feelings? What can I say. I'm a sadistic bastard. Ripping the wings off of right wingers is my idea of fun. :-)) Well, time for that afternoon training ride here in bicycling paradise... -Paul |
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 30, 3:07*pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
> About the ass kicking thing- Let's just say that I was always the > biggest guy in the peloton. Dumbass, Hi again. You couldn't be bigger than you are dumber. Have a nice day, SoTS |
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 30, 1:16 pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> On May 30, 3:07 pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > > > About the ass kicking thing- Let's just say that I was always the > > biggest guy in the peloton. > > Dumbass, > > Hi again. You couldn't be bigger than you are dumber. > > Have a nice day, > SoTS You have no idea. It's 68 degrees, a beautiful day for a ride thru the vineyards. Whew, I see it's 92 and humid in Austin. Reminds me of sweating thru basic training at Lackland AFB in San Antonio. Hey, I came up with a limerick on my training ride, hope you enjoy it: There once was a SLAVE OF THE STATE who suffered an ignominious fate See Paul is a bard, while SLAVE'S a retard So SLAVE'S feeling peckish of late. How's that for a first effort? I'll have to refine it. I really wanted to rhyme "retard" with "petard", but this has a Shakespearean flavor too. You have a nice day too. -Paul |
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 30, 4:57*pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
> How's that for a first effort? *I'll have to refine it. Dumbass, The more you post the better. --SoTS |
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 30, 5:07 pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> On May 30, 4:57 pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > > > How's that for a first effort? I'll have to refine it. > > Dumbass, > > The more you post the better. > > --SoTS OK, you're on! Wadda ya think- be honest, I can take criticism: There is a fat SLAVE OF THE STATE who's feelings are hurting of late Paul's celebrating surely, while SLAVE'S being surly Poor SLAVE BOY just can't catch a break. A little help here, I'm stuck. What rhymes with "purple"? -Paul |
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 30, 7:57*pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
> On May 30, 5:07 pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote: > > > On May 30, 4:57 pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > > > > How's that for a first effort? *I'll have to refine it. > > > Dumbass, > > > The more you post the better. > > OK, you're on! Wadda ya think- be honest, I can take criticism: Hi Big Dumb Paul, I don't really have a criticism of you for anything you have the capacity change. --SoTS |
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 30, 8:49 pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> On May 30, 7:57 pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > > > On May 30, 5:07 pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote: > > > > On May 30, 4:57 pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > > > > > How's that for a first effort? I'll have to refine it. > > > > Dumbass, > > > > The more you post the better. > > > OK, you're on! Wadda ya think- be honest, I can take criticism: > > Hi Big Dumb Paul, > > I don't really have a criticism of you for anything you have the > capacity change. > > --SoTS |
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 30, 8:49 pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> On May 30, 7:57 pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > > > On May 30, 5:07 pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote: > > > > On May 30, 4:57 pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote: > > > > > How's that for a first effort? I'll have to refine it. > > > > Dumbass, > > > > The more you post the better. > > > OK, you're on! Wadda ya think- be honest, I can take criticism: > > Hi Big Dumb Paul, > > I don't really have a criticism of you for anything you have the > capacity change. > > --SoTS "Big dumb Paul"?! You're a glutton for punishment. I think I nailed this part: "Paul's celebrating surely, while SLAVE'S being surly" Darn, I was hoping you could help me out by coming up with something that rhymes with "purple". Maybe you could tell me- does "Regina" rhyme with "vagina"? If it does, it would be funnier than "china", and I love a good laugh. -Paul -Paul |
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Fri, 30 May 2008 05:05:48 -0700 (PDT), Bill C
<tritonrider@verizon.net> wrote: >I've highlighted several factual errors, then you said he wasn't >talking about the un-insured and I linked to his page where it beigns >with a lengthy bit on them, you choose to ignore the user satisfaction >because it doesn't fit your argument, etc... None of your posts pointed out factual errors in Moore - they implied errors but didn't get to specifics. That sort of "pointing" to errors is easy - but not accurate. His website talks about the uninsured, as does the opening sequence of the movie, but the focus on the movie is on insured people adn the problems many face in the US healthcare system. There surely are errors in the Moore movies - it's just about unavoidable in 90 or 120 minutes. Are there serious errors? I've never seen evidence of any. Are there many? No. |
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Fri, 30 May 2008 06:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Bill C
<tritonrider@verizon.net> wrote: > I'm a brainwashed, mentally deficient, scatterbrain apparently, >because I have varied opinions and thoughts on the issues. No, it's not because you have varied opinions. It's because you make all sorts of illogical connections between things. All the opponent of a poltician has to do to get you to not vote for his opponent is say "Michael Moore has endorsed some of my opponents ideas" All a politician has to do to have you not vote for him/her would be to accept money from, say MoveOn. That's it. You can agree with 60%, 80& or more of their policies, but those little bogeymen are enough to have you write them off. It seems like you don't vote your interests or your goals. |
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Fri, 30 May 2008 10:56:32 -0700 (PDT), Bill C
<tritonrider@verizon.net> wrote: > There's a ton of tuff that the insurance companies do that are total >BS. That's part of the reason Moore pisses me off so badly. He could >very easily build incredibly solid arguments for his positions, You don't even know his positions. You keep posting critiques that are distortions or innaccurate representations of his positions. > and do >it in ways where anyone questioning the credibility would have to be a >certified idiot. > Instead he cooks up his propaganda, Nothing is cooked. All is true. Not all sides, not every option but all is true. |
|