![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 27, 2:34*pm, Bob Schwartz <bob.schwa...@REMOVEsbcglobal.net>
wrote: > You know, I was just thinking that this was one of > Bill's best trolls ever. But he insists on picking > at it, sort of like the monkey does. Which just > kills his troll index. > > Bob Schwartz- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Wasn't a troll. It was supposed to be a sincere thank you, and recognition for the folks who normally get hammered on this stuff and accused of all kinds of stupid shit by assholes like Hannity, Coulter, and Malkin. Nothing more, or less. If I wasn't so straightforward, and honest with what I'm thinking I'd save myself a lot of grief. If I'd skipped this paragraph this wouldn't have even been a discussion: I've said it before, and I'm not any less cynical about the motives, and am not about to forgive and forget, but today the vast majority of the folks on the left are doing far more for the troops, their families, and the Country than the clowns in the Whitehouse and their cronies. Once a trust is violated, it takes time and concrete actions to be healed. Anyone who says anything else is lieing. Lots of veterans feel that they were violated, both by the politicians and the anti-war folks. I'm one. I also realize that the actions of lots of those folks have changed now, and was giving credit to them, but it's going to take longer for me to be convinced on what the motivation is. If some idiot is always attacking a certain group, makes it clear that they are considered faulty humansat best, etc... then suffers a bunch of setbacks, like lost elections, which could be tied to that attitude, and all of a sudden has "seen the light" and is supporting those people, and wants to be elected. What's the real reason for the attitude change, and is the attitude change actually real, or just a campaign fantasy? There is no question in my mind at all that the support for the troops from Howard, JT, and others here is totally genuine mjust because of the people they are. For the rest of the planet they don't get the benefit of the doubt. It's the old joke about "How do you know a politician is lieing?" "His lips are moving!" I'll be interested to see how deep the support actually runs once it's not politically expedient. It may very well be totally genuine, and hope it is, and will thank them for it again if it is. Contrary to the popular slander, and purposeful misconception I'm not all on anyone's side, and maybe that's the problem since those tents look pretty damned tiny, but I enjoy being a heretic. Lets face it, all the interesting people are going to hell, right? From Tolkien: Treebeard the oldest Ent says: "I'm not altogether on anyone's side because nobody is altogether on my side" Bill C |
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 27, 11:34*am, Bob Schwartz <bob.schwa...@REMOVEsbcglobal.net>
wrote: > You know, I was just thinking that this was one of > Bill's best trolls ever. But he insists on picking > at it, sort of like the monkey does. Which just > kills his troll index. t-indexes say more than h-indexes, even bad ones. |
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <6a2ultF33qg21U3@mid.individual.net>, Kyle Legate <legatek@hotmail.com>
wrote: > Howard Kveck wrote: > > In article > > <447839cf-bb45-4ff7-8edb-8825fb133db7@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, > > Bill C <tritonrider@verizon.net>, who really really really really really > > really really really really really really really really really really really > > really really really really really really really really loves the treadmill, > > wrote: > > > > (snippola) > > > > You "see" a lot of stuff, Bill. Unfortunately, most of it is through the > > eyes of someone who thinks that liberals/progressives/Democrats are to blame for > > every ill in the world, in spite of your denials of same. > > > Here we go again. Hey, I think I showed a lot of restraint, Kyle! I know past history indicates you would be correct but I don't really feel obligated to do the usual rebuttal of every point, 'cuz that'd be the treadmill. -- tanx, Howard Whatever happened to Leon Trotsky? He got an icepick That made his ears burn. remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 28, 1:30*am, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> > * *Hey, I think I showed a lot of restraint, Kyle! I know past historyindicates you > would be correct but I don't really feel obligated to do the usual rebuttal of every > point, 'cuz that'd be the treadmill. > > -- > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * tanx, > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Howard > > * * * * * * * * * * * * Whatever happened to > * * * * * * * * * * * * Leon Trotsky? > * * * * * * * * * * * * He got an icepick > * * * * * * * * * * * * That made his ears burn. > > * * * * * * * * * * *remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? You make my arrogant elitist case well here Howard. Only you, and those who think your way have the correct positions, no dissent will be tolerated from the unwashed who haven't learned to think properly. I apreciate your restraint in not re-educating me yet again properly. Sorry to have been such a poor student and to actually have independent thoughts and concerns which you find unworthy. I'll try to get with the program. Bill C |
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <149e833d-6dc5-471d-9653-7c992e50d3bb@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
Bill C <tritonrider@verizon.net> wrote: > On May 28, 1:30?am, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote: > > > Hey, I think I showed a lot of restraint, Kyle! I know past history indicates you > > would be correct but I don't really feel obligated to do the usual rebuttal > > of every point, 'cuz that'd be the treadmill. > You make my arrogant elitist case well here Howard. Only you, and > those who think your way have the correct positions, no dissent will > be tolerated from the unwashed who haven't learned to think properly. > I apreciate your restraint in not re-educating me yet again properly. > Sorry to have been such a poor student and to actually have > independent thoughts and concerns which you find unworthy. > I'll try to get with the program. Bill, we both know that you post things like the one I briefly replied to so you can get "good talk" going. I didn't feel like rebutting *every point* like you hoped for, as it's been done before (X many). Anyway, you did a good job of proving John's point - pretty much all of what you wrote about Obama is SOP rightwing talking points. I suppose I should be glad that you didn't include anything about "re- education camps" - that's progress. You know, I'm glad that you posted that you think that liberals/progressives/ Democrats are doing a better job of supporting the troops than the people who're supposedly known for doing it but the stuff after kind of soured the thought. I don't think you intended the post as a troll but the way that stuff slips out made it one. I think that stuff is so ingrained in your psyche that it just comes out on its own. (Of course, calling the l/p/D side a bunch of commies elsewhere didn't really do your cause much good, if you know what I mean.) I'm not sure that you can objectively look at your own posts and see just how much time you spend bashing "the left" and blaming them for just about every conceivable ill. But what is thoroughly confounding is that you state your position on a wide range of issues and they're frequently the ones supported by the very people you're bashing and blaming. Your blind blaming of "the left" is obvious in this thread with the suggestion that guys who came back from SE Asia were "destroyed by the hatred" here. It's a good proposition if you close your eyes and pretend that the guys coming back from SEA were all clean, sober and happy when they landed and it was only the nonstop showers of spit and screams of "babykiller" that made them drunks and addicts, that it had nothing whatsoever to do with them trying to do whatever it took to mute the horrible situation they were in over in SEA. Of course, you'd also have to pretend that a lot of non-soldier guys from that era didn't also end up as drunks and addicts. Anyway, your response above comes across as strangely petulant. I'm not (and neither is John) trying to "re-educate" you and I don't find your "independent thoughts and concerns" unworthy. I disagree with how you characterise an huge swath of the American public, i.e. traitors, fools and haters of this country. I find your attempts to make me out as some kind of "elitist" to be as off base as your attempts to label me as a Stalinist Maoist FARCer. -- tanx, Howard Whatever happened to Leon Trotsky? He got an icepick That made his ears burn. remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 27, 1:57 am, Donald Munro <fat-dumb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> b...@mambo.ucolick.org wrote: > > I have an AMERICAN bicycle. > > With parts made in Japan. > > (lyrics from an 80's song I think). Domo arigato, Mr. Benotto. Homegrown: http://www.paulcomp.com/ Rasta anodized parts or none at all, Ben |
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 29, 8:31*pm, "b...@mambo.ucolick.org" <b...@mambo.ucolick.org>
wrote: > On May 27, 1:57 am, Donald Munro <fat-dumb...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > b...@mambo.ucolick.org wrote: > > > I have an AMERICAN bicycle. > > > With parts made in Japan. > > > (lyrics from an 80's song I think). > > Domo arigato, Mr. Benotto. > > Homegrown:http://www.paulcomp.com/ > > Rasta anodized parts or none at all, I was thinking about painting my Japanese Clown Car. I thought this would be good to drive around Santa Rosa in with the following in Arnold Bocklin text: OBAMA = KOMMIE MCCAIN = BIG GOVERNMENT in high contrast Purple American Paint by me, an American Painter. Maybe OBAMA IS A HATER MCCAIN IS A LIFETIME PUBLIK "SERVANT" would be good too. I like your rasta touch -- I'll put Marley on the player with big bass and open windows. I'm doing the Starbucks drive-thru. |
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
bjw@mambo.ucolick.org schreef:
> Donald Munro wrote: >> With parts made in Japan. >> (lyrics from an 80's song I think). > > Domo arigato, Mr. Benotto. Thanks for another trip down an unexplored crevice of popular culture. As a child of the Eighties, how could I have missed this?! http://youtube.com/watch?v=JRNGbs26MNo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilroy...ere_%28album%29 (also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilroy_was_here ; I knew the doodle but not the story) |
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Donald Munro wrote:
> Fred Fredburger wrote: >> Just another liberal-name-calling-hater. >> Oops, I left out "gay". > > I believe impotent was being used by the Insult Generator module > before the Kunich bot was shut down for a pre-election upgrade. > > Anyway considering the Fredburgers alarming reproductive rate > they can't be gay. Hermaphrodite perhaps, but not gay. > I will remember that, next time you tell me to go f___ myself. |
|