![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 22, 11:42*pm, Kurgan Gringioni <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 22, 4:17*am, Keith <nos...@nospam.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Moreover, when Contador was w/ Seguros, he won the ITT in the 2005 Vuelta > > >> al País Vasco while "only" taking 3rd overall. Perhaps one could make the > > >> conclusion (if one were to base one's conclusions about a racer soleyon > > >> race results) that Contador was a good ITTer and lost that race because of > > >> his lack of climbing skills. > > > >In addition the 2nd half involved lots of climbing. Simoni did well too, > > >and he's not exactly renowned dor his TT abilities. * > > > True, that's probably the only reason I'm reserving judgement on > > Contador until we get a flat ITT and we see how he does against > > Kloden. > > > In spite of all the "affairs" I'd kept my interest in cycling at a > > high level but if we get another LA clone for the next 5 years (i.e. > > better than everyone, everywhere) I'm giving up. For a start it's just > > not "human" and secondly it becomes uninteresting. I hope Bruyneel > > gets caught once and for all. > > Dumbass - > > You've got your head up your ass. It would be more abnormal for > cycling to have parity. It's normal for there to be a dominant talent. > > Before LANCE, there was Indurain. Before Indurain, Hinault. Before > Hinault, there was Merckx (TIOOYK). Before Merckx, there was Coppi. > > thanks, > > K. Gringioni.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - No, before Merckx it was Rick Van Looy. |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 23, 12:34 am, Keith <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> In spite of all the "affairs" I'd kept my interest in cycling at a > >> high level but if we get another LA clone for the next 5 years (i.e. > >> better than everyone, everywhere) I'm giving up. For a start it's just > >> not "human" and secondly it becomes uninteresting. I hope Bruyneel > >> gets caught once and for all. > > >Dumbass - > > >You've got your head up your ass. It would be more abnormal for > >cycling to have parity. It's normal for there to be a dominant talent. > > >Before LANCE, there was Indurain. Before Indurain, Hinault. Before > >Hinault, there was Merckx (TIOOYK). Before Merckx, there was Coppi. > > Numbnuts - > What changed with LA is that he trashed the competition EVERYWHERE, > ITT, Mountains for 7 YEARS and bonked only once (Joux Plane 2000), > champs like Merckx, Hinault or Fignon could only do that for one or > two years when they peaked. http://youtube.com/watch?v=Vb1EYB-VzVI |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 23, 2:10 pm, Andre <ANDREJANSSE...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 22, 11:42 pm, Kurgan Gringioni <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 22, 4:17 am, Keith <nos...@nospam.com> wrote: > > > > >> Moreover, when Contador was w/ Seguros, he won the ITT in the 2005 Vuelta > > > >> al País Vasco while "only" taking 3rd overall. Perhaps one could make the > > > >> conclusion (if one were to base one's conclusions about a racer soley on > > > >> race results) that Contador was a good ITTer and lost that race because of > > > >> his lack of climbing skills. > > > > >In addition the 2nd half involved lots of climbing. Simoni did well too, > > > >and he's not exactly renowned dor his TT abilities. > > > > True, that's probably the only reason I'm reserving judgement on > > > Contador until we get a flat ITT and we see how he does against > > > Kloden. > > > > In spite of all the "affairs" I'd kept my interest in cycling at a > > > high level but if we get another LA clone for the next 5 years (i.e. > > > better than everyone, everywhere) I'm giving up. For a start it's just > > > not "human" and secondly it becomes uninteresting. I hope Bruyneel > > > gets caught once and for all. > > > Dumbass - > > > You've got your head up your ass. It would be more abnormal for > > cycling to have parity. It's normal for there to be a dominant talent. > > > Before LANCE, there was Indurain. Before Indurain, Hinault. Before > > Hinault, there was Merckx (TIOOYK). Before Merckx, there was Coppi. > > > thanks, > > > K. Gringioni.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > No, before Merckx it was Rick Van Looy. Right, Rik II won as many Grand Tours as I have. Coppi may have been the most naturally talented cyclist ever, Merckx not withstanding. |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 24, 2:24 am, zzfrank...@mac.com wrote:
> On May 23, 12:34 am, Keith <nos...@nospam.com> wrote: > > > > > >> In spite of all the "affairs" I'd kept my interest in cycling at a > > >> high level but if we get another LA clone for the next 5 years (i.e. > > >> better than everyone, everywhere) I'm giving up. For a start it's just > > >> not "human" and secondly it becomes uninteresting. I hope Bruyneel > > >> gets caught once and for all. > > > >Dumbass - > > > >You've got your head up your ass. It would be more abnormal for > > >cycling to have parity. It's normal for there to be a dominant talent. > > > >Before LANCE, there was Indurain. Before Indurain, Hinault. Before > > >Hinault, there was Merckx (TIOOYK). Before Merckx, there was Coppi. > > > Numbnuts - > > What changed with LA is that he trashed the competition EVERYWHERE, > > ITT, Mountains for 7 YEARS and bonked only once (Joux Plane 2000), > > champs like Merckx, Hinault or Fignon could only do that for one or > > two years when they peaked. > > http://youtube.com/watch?v=Vb1EYB-VzVI It's strange see this now-- LA laboring like a non-TT piker. |
|